Could Feminists(and male suppporters) be Angry because they are ugly?

I'm sure it never occurred to you that the floosie Willis was married to cheated on him, and thus the reason for their split.

 

Exactly. He wasn't man enough for someone like Demi Moore.

Can you find an excuse for that eunuch Limpblob?

 

Why would Rush need an excuse for anything...he's successful, he's rich, he's politically brilliant, he's Conservative, has a great sense of humor and he's happily married to a younger beautiful woman.

 

But he is a failure as a man. All his other wives were babes, too, and they couldn't take much more than ten years of the slimey little pig.

 

Oh, and you personally knew all of Rush's ex wives and that it was they who set such a high standard that Rush couldn't meet. I suppose all the men that were once married to women who divorced them to become raging femanazi lesbos were to blame for their broken marriages as well. I got married at a young age to 3 women who I had to let go because they all turned into flighty liberals. So in my case and in perhaps Rush's history with women--we both went on and progressed by reaching for a higher standard of life and lifestyles.

 

The overriding factor is that he is a really really ugly fat slug. Repulsive physically. So incredibly repulsive. He is the epitome of what would put a woman off sex for life. His fatness, his slug-like body. His fat ugly face. His grotty mouth. Fancy you revering such a slob of a man who doesn't take care of his physical appearance.

 

Jealousy becomes you. The fact that Rush wouldn't give a nod to a fat ugly lesbo woman, but instead found himself a beautiful younger Conservative woman tells me that Rush not only has great taste in political ideology, but has great taste in women as well.

 

LOL!! Blind you are. He is a slug. Physically repulsive. Fat man who would be disgusting to touch. All those rolls of fat. And blubber.

You are deluded.

I think all you fella's calling feminists ugly hags should post your pictures here.

Then I can pick you off one by one for the UGLY hypocrites you most likely are.

 

Yes, a beautiful woman, too.

I thinks there's a lot sour, bitter men on these threads. Who must get passed up by intelligent, beautiful women a lot.

Nothing else explains their pathetic vitriol for women.

 

Any and all vitriol we Conservatives may have for women is relegated to ugly disgusting lesbo femanazis and other liberal women who share their views. Btw, post a pic of yourself here and I'll oblige by doing the same, although by me doing so I subject myself to a never ending overload of e-mails from online chicks that just want to get to know the highly intelligent dapper man they see in the picture.

 

Yes, yes, ugly disgusting lesbo feminazis...

Says the man who reveres the slimiest ugliest pig on earth.

LOL!!

Blind blind blind.

Fancy liking an unhealthy unfit slobby pig like Rush.

You are a funny man.

 

Pardon, but I do not post pictures of me in a political forum. Too many weirdos on such boards. Would you?
Even if you think the antifeminists of this forum were fat and ugly persons, this would only prove that ugliness is no excuse to become a feminist.

 

It doesn't matter how many threads are started here claiming feminists are every bad thing under the sun. It doesn't matter. Reality exists in the day to day of our lives. This section of the forum is completely out of touch with reality. And mostly comprises the sour bitter laments of sour bitter men.

Feminists don't approach the kind of sexist men that post in this section. And these feminists who don't approach these kind of men are articulate, intelligent, attractive women. My friends don't walk around talking about feminism all day, but they are feminists. And they are accomplished, successful, attractive, confident, happy women. And they are feminists.

The useless, immature descriptions of feminists here is pathetic and juvenile.

At the end of the day, what's new? Not much, just the usual silly men here beating up on women for their own twisted, silly bitter reasons.

 

Dude, did you notice we were comparing Alan Alda to the Rushblob. Alda has never been in trouble with the law, served honorably as an artillery officer in the Army Reserve and has managed to stay permanently married to the same beautiful and talented woamn for over fifty years. The Rushblob was busted for a felony, rode the sick list to get out of serving in Vietnam and hates women, but keeps marrying them juyst to prove he isn't a closet queer (and not convincing any of us who know what homosexuality is about) and getting discarded by women who can no longer deal with his sexual dysfunction.

Some freeaking excuse for a man.

What would really make me happy is to still be able to drag a hose line into five thousand gallons of burning jet fuel just for drill like I used to, but the little injuries catch up to a man over 50 years. But at least my wife of 30 years has never had reason to complain about my junk's not working.

 

Delusional. But what else could one expect from a ranting misogynist who once started a thread using a video made by a Nazi slimeball comparing feminism to the Holocaust?

BTW, that picture in the upper corner here is actually a screen capture from one of my YouTube videos. I really do look like that.

 

You exaggerate, no one claims feminists to be responsible for famines in North Korea. They are responsible for their own misandrist agenda. There are too many bad things in the world to be caused by a few western feminists alone.

Physically not (luckily!), but they approach men in their publications and books. They philosophize about their supposed reconcileablelessness of men with a modern world, painting men as a problem of pollution or crime or whatever. Usually thats the revenge of ugly fat women to whom the life was too hard.

How do you come to the idea they were feminists. If anyone of your attributes fit to your friends I seriously doubt that they could even be feminists.

These descriptions are the result of what feminists write in their books, magazines and publications. Behind a bad camouflage of a so called equality between men and women they are fighting for a two class society with first class citizen and second class citizen.

Beating up women? Only a small group of women are feminists. Just for the protocol, nobody of these persons would appreciate male feminists any more than female feminists.

 

Interesting that the so-called 'family values' crowd revere a disingenuous, un-family-like slug like Rush. Like attracts like, they say. "Show me the kind of person you like / admire and I'll tell you who you are." To praise a parasite like that is telling on these people.

In not liking Alda they reveal how anti-family they are. And how slimy grotty men are more their heroes. Meanwhile they crow about loose morals, gays and feminists, while revering the fattest slug on earth of slimey character. It's somewhat amazing to find people being drawn to a severely unhealthy unfit ugly slug like that. Perhaps these people want to emulate that level of bad health and unfitness. Or perhaps they already have that level of bad health and unfitness, in which case, they most likely rail against women because women are repulsed by them. I mean, Rush is the vilest looking thing, his obsession with things of a sexual nature when the fat slug can't even move cos he's so fat. That man is repulsiveness personified. And the Rush lovers complain about ugly feminists while revering the ugliest pig on earth. Very telling, methinks.

 

Here, check out what Rush's hot wife has to say about Rush her cuddly man:

http://takemycountryback.com/rush-limbaughs-wife/

 

The piece is a SATIRE. She didn't write it. But you knew that, right?

Your hero is a mass of blubber and rolls of fat. You revere an unhealthy fat man. Doesn't say much for you.

 

Although I do not even know Limbaugh, what's so important about him? You may always argue about ugliness, as far as I am concerned I would instantaniously admit, he will not win a beauty contest. So what? I can understand if someone claims, he is ugly, so what? And if you convince me that he was an idiot, so what?

There may be a lot of antifeminists, who are idiots. If I give you an example of a stupid and ugly democrat will that be an evidence that democracy should be replaced by a dictator?

 

Look up at the title of the thread. UGLINESS is the subject of this thread. I am pointing out that one of the most vocal dickheads calling feminists ugly is a fat ugly slug called Rush Limbaugh. He is a fat repulsive man that would put a woman off love and sex for life. He is the epitome of a Repulsive Male.

 

Not so far-fetched. Didn't you see the threads claiming: “Feminists are making Americans fat”, or the thread titled: “Feminism means Genocide”. LOL. There are some serious nutters in this place.

No men out there positing vile positions regarding women in books and publications, huh? I mean, you should the sexist, misogynistic crap I have to put up with in this place!!

You don't know what feminism is.

Post a thread about one of these publications. Might be a breath of fresh air / and may strike a balance to hear a woman rising up to MEET and MATCH the level of misogyny that is commonplace in this section of the forum.

Like I said, you don't know what feminism is. Attributing it to a small group is pretty ridiculous and uninformed.

 

Whether attacking women or blacks, the right wing seems ate up with Dunning-Kruger syndrome.

 

Anyway, he is just ONE example.

I do not know if feminism make Americans fat, more likely it is the fat which makes them fat.
Nevertheless a connection between ugliness and feminism is not an absurd thesis considering the relative numbers of ugly feminists. This does not mean that some anti-feminists can be ugly as well.

Of course there are men who publish insulting theories or thesis about women, but what's the point? There are Indians who publish insulting books about Pakis, is that a sufficient evidence that there are no Pakis who publish insulting books about Indians?

I know what feminism is, it's a simple label you can use to mask a misandrist political agenda. Because of the wide spreaded intolerance and the totalitarian attitude of many feminists two feminists themselves weren't able to agree on an exact definition and deny each other the right to call themselves feminists - a term that isn't protected by a copyright -, as you can distinguish between different ideas of feminism. Satre or Simone de Beauvoir would not agree with Valerie Soalanas who would not agree with Andrea Dworkin who would not agree with the former Zapatero government in Spain.

Ok, here just a first trial:

SCUM

I don't state it's a small group in absolute numbers, but you cannot equate women with feminists cause the numbers of feminists are small relative to the number of women at all.

 

Yup. Them feminist celebrities sure is a ugly lot.

[video=youtube;DbIU_xP7dos]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbIU_xP7dos[/video]