Elizabeth Warren releases DNA test with 'strong evidence' of Native American ancestry

William Dlwgosh · Oct 19, 2018

BuckyBadger said: ↑

See below. Directed him hereost #450
Click to expand...

Post #450 looks like a bunch of stuff by you, unless you're saying I'm supposed to follow the link to Benny Johnson's (whoever that is) twitter page where He Also makes the claim that Warren claimed minority status for career advancement without a source. Either way, asinine.

ArmySoldier · Oct 19, 2018

William Dlwgosh said: ↑

I have no idea why she claimed minority status on a college register or what prompted her to do so. Honestly, I don't really care but do understand why actual Native Americans would. Again, I find the whole thing to be irresponsible and unimpressive of Warren. I also find the whole thing to relatively unimportant, especially as I'm assuming that this 30 or 40 years ago?. If your first suspicion was that she misrepresented for the sake of gaining tenure, I understand that. But when the Boston Globe does an investigation and says that her supposed minority background had nothing to do with her promotions at Harvard or anywhere else then for me it's that assumption no longer holds up.

I'm not saying that this is true of you in particular but I think there are a lot of people in here who argue 'assumption' as fact, on both sides. Today I felt like pushing back on that.

Our conversation started with some confusion. I'm glad we sorted that out. Thanks for being civil.
Click to expand...

They found no hard evidence, no. The only place we could find that evidence would be in her brain, and the brain of those she worked with. All we know is what she claimed to be on the documentation. Unfortunately for truth seekers, there's no other evidence.

Why'd she do it at such a convenient time? There will never be proof to answer that question.

Good chatting with you

William Dlwgosh · Oct 19, 2018

ArmySoldier said: ↑

They found no hard evidence, no. The only place we could find that evidence would be in her brain, and the brain of those she worked with. All we know is what she claimed to be on the documentation. Unfortunately for truth seekers, there's no other evidence.

Why'd she do it at such a convenient time? There will never be proof to answer that question.

Good chatting with you
Click to expand...

That's reasonable, and good chatting with you too.

PrincipleInvestment · Oct 20, 2018

vman12 said: ↑

Just like you can always tell when a leftist is losing the argument.
Click to expand...

Yep ... it's "big words" like Hannitized that gives them away. Liberals just "get woke" of course. "ization" by MSM never a factor either. "Free thinkers" ... as in always thinking about what else they can "get for free" through taxation.

Jestsayin · Oct 20, 2018

William Dlwgosh said: ↑

I have no idea why she claimed minority status on a college register or what prompted her to do so. Honestly, I don't really care but do understand why actual Native Americans would. Again, I find the whole thing to be irresponsible and unimpressive of Warren. I also find the whole thing to relatively unimportant, especially as this was 23-30 years ago?. If your first suspicion was that she misrepresented for the sake of gaining tenure, I understand that. But when the Boston Globe does an investigation and says that her supposed minority background had nothing to do with her promotions at Harvard or anywhere else then for me that assumption no longer holds up.

I'm not saying that this is true of you in particular but I think there are a lot of people in here who argue 'assumption' as fact, on both sides. Today I felt like pushing back on that.

Our conversation started with some confusion. I'm glad we sorted that out. Thanks for being civil.
Click to expand...

If while in college 35 years ago is currently unimportant, why did the dems spend two months trying to derail Kavanaugh while he was in High School 36 years ago?

Warrens ethnic status was changed twice. Once at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, a second time at Harvard. In both cases the University was trying to beef up their minority status and become more "politically correct"
The broad is a fraud.

Zorro · Oct 20, 2018

PrincipleInvestment said: ↑

Still can't accept that anyone thinks the topic is anything but foolish. I can't count the number of times democrats on the forum have told me Donald Trump isn't living rent free in their heads. Voila' enter she-buffoon Liz Warren. Nope ... Trump hasn't gotten under anyones skin. Not at all.
Click to expand...

Trump's running circle around her.

yiostheoy · Oct 26, 2018

Lee S said: ↑

Elizabeth Warren does have a minute fraction of native-American ancestory, but that makes absolutely no difference in mitigating the theft of opportunity she perpetuated to enrich herself. According to the report from Bustamante, she had a single ancestor from six to ten generations ago who had native American heritage. As a base point to begin an argument, the average white American has at least some native American ancestory.

https://www.quora.com/What-percentage-of-the-US-population-carry-Native-Americans’-DNA

In light of this data, it would be very surprising if Elizabeth Warren, who comes from Oklahoma, would have absolutely no native American DNA. The only salient issue is just how much DNA is required to deprive true native Americans of their federal grants and federal set asides which were granted to the Tribes so that they could lift themselves out of some pretty appalling conditions of poverty, substance abuse, and squalor which can be found on the reservations. Here are two links which describe how much native-American ancestory should be required:

https://www.theroot.com/how-do-i-legally-prove-native-american-ancestry-1790877932

https://www.powwows.com/much-percentage-native-american-enrol-tribe/

It should be crystal clear to everyone that Elizabeth Warren comes nowhere near the threshholds required to claim native American heritage for the sake of an advantage in hiring, college admission, or preference to a graduate school.

So does the fact that Elizabeth Warren could, according to the Bustamante report which shows Elizabeth Warren as having 0.094% native American DNA, while the average white American has 0.18% native American DNA, exonerate her in the least? Of course not. She has less than half the native DNA as the average person reading this thread. Yet she stole opportunities from native American tribes by marking native-American ancestory on college Admission Application and took slots intended for real native Americans which had a desperate need for those slots so the tribes could use skilled doctors, counselors, nurses, engineers, and lawyers to protect and enrich their tribes. Stealing from the most vulnerable people in the nation is not something that should be rewarded with your votes.

If you respect or empathize with the plight of the Native American tribes, then you cannot support Elizabeth Warren.
Click to expand...

It's funny how the Cherokee Nation disavowed any knowledge of her.

ThorInc · Oct 28, 2018

Hummm, this thread is a legit current event & it was moved to an obscured forum and left to die? She has NA ancestry no?

Log in or Sign up

Elizabeth Warren releases DNA test with 'strong evidence' of Native American ancestry

William Dlwgosh Active Member

ArmySoldier Well-Known Member Past Donor

William Dlwgosh Active Member

PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

Zorro Well-Known Member

yiostheoy Well-Known Member

ThorInc Banned

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Elizabeth Warren releases DNA test with 'strong evidence' of Native American ancestry

William Dlwgosh Active Member

ArmySoldier Well-Known Member Past Donor

William Dlwgosh Active Member

PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

Zorro Well-Known Member

yiostheoy Well-Known Member

ThorInc Banned

Share This Page

Useful Searches