Evidence severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried

Evidence is only lacking to those who won't go to the sources provided.
Evidence is not lacking for the claim that UA93 crashed in Shanksville, PA.

 

Prove it, or stay off this thread.

That's not what the topics about. Stay on topic.

 

I have made my argument and provided my sources. Can you dispute them? Can you provide a counter argument with sources?

I am completely on topic.

 

There is no point in trying to debate with this guy.

And for the record, the "evidence" that there was no apparent wreckage comes from a photo used in the so-called documentary "Spare Change". The photo was taken the day AFTER the crash.


Sigh

 

OK.. It crashed there. Where is any evidence of it being buried 40 feet? That's all you're contending with this whole response. Nothing consequential suggesting Flight 93 was buried.

You could just admit there is no evidence of it being buried, and possibly regain some credibility.

 

It certainly did.

 

Great post.

It's obvious they don't care about the truth, they only care about convincing people 93 crashed there. It's like this:


Them: Flight 93 crashed there.
Us: But the story doesn't add up with the evidence.
Them: Doesn't matter. It crashed there.

 

The story completely adds up with the evidence, if you bother to look at it. At least 'Fraud admits that UA93 crashed there.

Shall I post all ten points for you again? How about the eyewitnesses? The coroner's statements? The first responders?

When will you contact the people who were on the scene?

 

I think the crater and debris field pictured is consistent with the crash of flight 93. These pictures in combination with corroborating evidence from witnessess, communications & electronic data and news reports provides a compelling case for the 9/11 reports accounting of flight 93. I have not seen any credible evidence that would support an alternative explanation for the disappearance of flight 93. Whats more, the official story seems to be the simplest and most plausible explanation.

 

Indeed....right after it was shot out of the sky by our military.

You know, Flight 93 being buried 40 feet down was the claim of the FBI. THEY DON'T DOCUMENT WHAT THEY FIND?

 

Please provide a source that shows evidence of UA93 being shot down.

Please provide a source that shows the FBI claiming in a report that UA93 was buried 40 feet down.

 

Is there any evidence to support your position? How did the military engage the aircraft? I haven't seen any evidence that the flight was engaged by offensive weapon systems. How did you arrive at this conclusion?

 

Of course there isn't. There never is any evidence to support their positions. Just anonymous one liners in a blog with no sources cited or speculative YouTube videos that, again, cite no sources and are filled with one logical fallacy after another, or quotes taken out of context. They believe that all the credible sources that one would use in an airline crash situation -- FBI, NTSB, county officials, etc -- are all part of the giant conspiracy so they discount any evidence from them.

And if you press them on it in this thread, even though they brought it up, suede will jump back in with Evidence severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried as the thread topic.

It is a complete waste of time trying to debate these people.

 

And YOU thought that was an accurate "study".



I easily proved it wasn't.

 

And why would this be covered up, if that was the case?

 

I haven't seen sufficient evidence for that.

How does any of that debunk the thread's topic?

I told you, not going to bother them and besides, why should I when you claim you have photo and video evidence to debunk the thread's topic that you could easily post and put this conspiracy theory to rest? Oh that's right, you ain't got squat or you would have posted it by now. So much for being truthful.

 

You won't see any evidence if you don't bother to look.

So much for your truthseeking.

 

How did 93 supposedly crash?

There's evidence of that, but it's a different topic. I hope you will show some credible evidence that proves most of 93 buried in the ground. Hannibal can't. NAB can't. Fangbeer can't. BullsLawDan can't. DDave can't. Candycorn can't. LoneStrSt8 can't.

Do you think you can? It was most of a Boeing 757. How hard can it be?

 

Post it. I'll look. Otherwise quit trolling. There are rules against that here.

You should talk!!!

 

Except for the fact that Evidence severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried.

That's right, trying to keep the trolls from derailing my thread because they can't debunk it.

 

The sources and the links to them have been posted in this thread. I've made my argument, as Makedde requested.

To remind you, start at post 191, proceed through to 200, where you'll find this:


Contact information for some flight 93 crash scene responders:

Shanksville Volunteer Fire Co, Shanksville, PA 15560.
Terry Schaffer, Chief; Rick King, Ass't Chief

Somerset County Emergency Services 100 East Union Street, Somerset, PA 15501

Westmoreland County Dept. of Emergency Management 12 Court House Square Greensburg, PA 15601

Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Harrisburg, PA 17101

A partial list, a more detailed one can be found in the first version of this thread.

Viola! Your sources.

 

Post your evidence, or quit trolling.

 

I posted a direct source, that's not trolling. Why do you insist on not looking at the source?

 

More eyewitness evidence. (Yet again) She saw the plane crash and go into the ground.

 

LOL, she has great eye site if she could see a plane bury after hitting at 580 mph when she's 1,500 yards away behind a wall of trees!

You might want to read her sentence right before the one you bolded. It will explain what she meant by the sentence you bolded or else quote mining that one sentence might make you think the WTC was scaled to the red barn.