Evidence severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried

Discussion in '9/11' started by suede, Sep 28, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are we even still talking about Flight 93? It's hard to keep track the way these threads seem to wander around. :mrgreen:

    In case we are, here's something to consider.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4#p/u/9/xkivdEGph9A
     
  2. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    PAs DEP reported very little fuel or other contaminents associated with a crashed commerical jet.
     
  3. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The DNA proves it was flight 93. Move along.
     
  4. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So what's your point?

    Can you refute the evidence presented in the video or was your one-liner sufficient to do that in your mind?
     
  5. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can you refute my one liner?
     
  6. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Under a chain of custody which was controlled by the very entity who's integrity is in question.

    I want to talk about the lack of contaminents at the site.
     
  7. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The points presented in the video already do that.

    Of course you do. It is the single shred that you are clinging to since you can't refute the rest of the points.
     
  8. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ??

    Substantial enough to indicate flight 93 did NOT crash at the site.
     
  9. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    DNA controlled by gov
     
  10. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And who in your view should have controlled the investigation?
     
  11. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Which you, of course, assume is lying to you. It sounds like you have the problem, nobody else.
     
  12. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The actual topic of the thread was burial of the debri.. This was abandoned ages ago.

    Since the topic itself is buried, as might as well talk about whatever.. I like to talk in this thread because candy tried to have it shut down by reaching 500 posts and it's fun to tack on more and more pages to it.
     
  13. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I actually misphrased that.. I didn't mean believe in things without evidence, I meant declare things as fact without evidence.
     
  14. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you trust the government 100%?
     
  15. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No; few do. But please walk us through this; who would have to be involved...the positions (I don't expect you to name names since you won't do that anyhow--classic twoofer tactic)?

    Please walk us through that.

    Next, are you stating that the remains returned to the families is not the DNA of their relatives?

    Or are you stating that the passengers of the airplanes were killed somewhere else, by someone else, and their DNA was then collected and returned to the relatives?

    If you are taking this tack, please elaborate; were they shot, hung, strangled, gassed, etc...

    I'm really curious to see just how far down the rabbit hole this goes.
     
  16. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If I knew any names at any time, I would probably be dead.


    No

    No

    N/A


    OK
     
  17. DDave

    DDave New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You didn't answer my question.

    Who in your view should have controlled the investigation?
     
  18. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Exaggerate much? I didn't ask for the names, the positions; who is in on this vast conspiracy?

    So you agree that the passengers died in a plane crash at the site where the planes crashed?

    Please describe your steps in the chain of custody from the time the passengers boarded the planes to the point where the remains were returned to the families.

    Amazingly, you guys always complain that nobody listens to you....yet when you're given a forum to set us all straight, you promise so much yet deliver so little.
     
  19. submarinepainter

    submarinepainter Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    19,816
    Likes Received:
    213
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    start a new thread folks the one is over 500 posts!!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page