Fallen officer's family snubs McConnell and McCarthy at Jan. 6 gold medal ceremony

Are you quoting Diaz in entirety….”

 

Unlike yourself, who definitely “knows” that he had “an underlying medical condition”….right?

 

And neither DO YOU…!

 

No, it does not.

 

Millions of men and women risk their lives every day. How many of them get medals?

 

Hey genius, a blood clot is an underlying medical condition. A blood clot is a serious thing especially depending on the location. Perhaps working a physically demanding and stressful job wasn't a good idea.

 

Do you even know what you're arguing at this point?

 

Are you trying to claim that thrombotic strokes don't exist now? You're in the bottom of the hole dude, just stop digging.

 

are you trying to say that blood clots can't cause a stroke now?

 

Of course blood clots can cause a stroke. To recap what I'm reading:

You claimed "blood clots in the neck do not cause brain strokes" in post #186.

You're obviously wrong about that, so I shared that fact in post #188 and provided you a clue: it's called a "thrombotic stroke".

You doubled-down on your false claim in post #196: "you would be wrong, but nice try"

And my response to that in pots #208: "Are you trying to claim that thrombotic strokes don't exist now? You're in the bottom of the hole dude, just stop digging."

Where, in any of that, did you get the idea that blood clots can't cause a stroke?

 

I realize it is against cult language to take Pence seriously. While I never agreed with his silly politics, I never considered him anything but serious. For the Cult, Pence was only to be taken seriously until he chose NOT to violate the constitution, after swearing, on a BIBLE, to protect it.

And he’s the one to not be taken seriously. Do you hear yourself? The ACTUAL Christian, who lives his beliefs, is the loser, per the Christian Right. How sad.

Do try to understand why nobody can truly ever take the so called Christian Right, seriously, about Christian beliefs, ever again.

 

True the Vote has obtained the video evidence and metadata regarding the compromise of the voting process in 2020. Together, in combination, these datasets give a clear picture of what transpired. Over 200 petabytes of data in total. It will require many man-years to do an investigation for just the data on-hand, and it isn't even a complete dataset of every instance of vote fraud. If you would like you can participate in the investigation as I did. This would satisfy you, as it did me, there was indeed significant vote fraud well beyond what would be necessary to alter the outcome.

 

And yet, somehow, we already know there was voter fraud.

 

It's obviously false to pretend that every Christian with right-of-center views thinks Pence is a "loser".

 

I was very clear that my observation only referred to cult members.

 

I genuinely don't know who you imagine are "cult members", but in the highlighted portions below you referred to "the Christian Right" and "the so called Christian Right". That comes across as a sweeping generalization, rather than something more narrowly-focused on a handful of people you imagine are "cult members."

Perhaps you intended to say you'd never take "cult members" seriously again, but that's not what you wrote.

 

I will never take anyone who voted for Trump twice seriously.

 

70% of Christians who attend church regularly, voted for Trump twice. They literally vote against their stated values. So, to the other 30%, apologies that you get lumped in with conman supporters.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-ta...end-worship-services-voted-for-trump-in-2020/

 

Is that your professional opinion as a licensed mental health professional.

Or, as I suspect, it's just word diarrhea from someone who has no idea what they are talking about?

 

Just a fact. None of those officers died in the line of duty.

 

That's not opinion. That is fact.

What we have is tracking data from about 2000 people in each of the swing states. This tracking data shows these people visited between 10 and 23 ballot boxes every day for the 30 days voting occurred. Only about 10% of the ballot boxes were filtered, so the actual number is likely much higher. Nevertheless, with just these 10% many of the people involved in the voter fraud have been identified. The tracking data shows these individuals repeatedly visited dozens of ballot boxes every day for 30 days with interim visits to nearby ANTIFA and BLM offices (to restock their ballots).

All of the ballot boxes were filmed (a requirement by law). Using the tracking data from above the time of arrival at each ballot box is known. Cross-referencing this approximate time to the video recordings shows these same people repeatedly walking up to the ballot boxes and dumping between 5 and 10 ballots per visit. It is illegal to cast ballots for anyone other than yourself or an infirmed immediate family member for whom you are their legal guardian or caretaker. This requires locating the footage for this period of time, watching for them to arrive and place the ballots into the drop boxes, then recording the exact moment they submitted the illegal ballots, and counting the number of ballots submitted for each visit. I volunteered to do just that. I randomly selected 2 sets of metadata from the 1700+ people Google flagged as having extremely high visitation rates to the ballot boxes. In the 2 cases I examined each one visited between 15 and 23 ballot boxes per day, for 30 days dropping between 5 and 10 ballots each visit. returning to BLM and ANTIFA every now and then between visits. Taking off only a handful of days during the 30-day voting period. It required about 5 weeks, 16 hours per day to document all the known visits for just one fraudulent voter and log the video. In the 2 cases I documented, the results showed each submitted over 3000 fraudulent votes. This from just 2 random selections among over 1700 flagged phones.

 

Hilarious.

 

No you don't have that.

What you have is tracking data showing some people coming NEAR ballot boxes. The resolution of cell phone tracking data is nowhere accurate enough to tell if they walked closer than 3 feet to the ballot box. The ballot boxes were purposefully put near high traffic areas to make them more accessible, so there is no way of knowing if they near there because their everyday activity took them there or because they were "stuffing" the ballot box. I go past the same locations every day going to and from work but that doesn't mean I'm interacting with any of those locations.

 

Incorrect. All of the ballot boxes had video cameras installed. By law that is a requirement. This video has been obtained through a FOIA request. This amounts to more than 200 Petabytes of data. The tracking data just gives you a means of knowing where in the video to look. A time saving device if you will. Although as I found out, it isn't as time saving as I would have liked.

 

The average person gets within 25 feet of a ballot box less than once per week. Some people might approach this close once per day or maybe even twice if they worked nearby. But to visit within 25 feet of more than 10 different ballot boxes, every day for 30 days is quite unusual. So unusual that out of several million people in Atlanta only 1700+ met this criterion. This serves as an easy means of filtering out those you referenced above. Again, a time saving device used to identify who exhibits a conspicuously high level of ballot box visitation. Regardless, should one of them be improperly flagged as you portend, then they would not be seen on video dropping multiple ballots into the drop boxes. So far no one flagged appears to have been erroneously flagged.

And your cognitive dissonance is starting to show.