FBI found Hillary Clinton's emails in Obama White House, former top official says

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MolonLabe2009, Apr 23, 2019.

  1. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He had no evidence. None. No collusion, no obstruction, no indictments. :)
     
  2. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,142
    Likes Received:
    63,369
    Trophy Points:
    113
    they will just go to the source... Mueller... but sad that the Trump Stooge doesn't want to answer under oath
     
  3. Reality

    Reality Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    21,660
    Likes Received:
    7,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wouldn't want to be subjected to the circle jerk that is Congressional testimony, when I could be doing my job, either.

    Yes, by all means call Mueller so he can break down barney style what I don't have any BARD evidence means for those mouth breathers.
     
  4. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,142
    Likes Received:
    63,369
    Trophy Points:
    113
    doesn't matter what you want, the people elected the House to do this job.... elections have consequences
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2019
  5. Reality

    Reality Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    21,660
    Likes Received:
    7,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Guess they'll just have to subpoena him then.

    I'll put it to you this way: No matter my position, if Congress wanted to speak with me in a public hearing? Yeah, they're going to need a subpoena to get my fat ass in the seat.
    What part of the fact that without a subpoena its an invitation he can freely reject is unclear to you?
    Don't worry if you're confused, I break down legal concepts barney style to people all the time.
     
  6. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,142
    Likes Received:
    63,369
    Trophy Points:
    113
    they will just call Mueller instead, he has shown us his guilty conscience by not going

    I never said otherwise, you strawman is noted

    as Trump said ‘If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth?’

    Barr works for the people, and has Congressional oversight.... you don't
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2019
  7. Reality

    Reality Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    21,660
    Likes Received:
    7,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its not a guilty conscience. You invited me, I declined because it was not mandatory and I had better **** to do.
     
  8. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,142
    Likes Received:
    63,369
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Barr works for the people, and has Congressional oversight.... you don't
     
  9. Reality

    Reality Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    21,660
    Likes Received:
    7,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And oversight is mandatory ie a subpoena, not an invitation which is not.

    If they want to exert their powers they must perform the necessary process. That's not "hey come down here and have a chat for 8 hours on live TV because its election season and I want to pretend to be valuable. " that's "you are ordered to appear upon pain of contempt at x time on y day at z location.
    Please be prepared to discuss the following blah blah blah Russia Russia Russia"
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2019
    BuckyBadger likes this.
  10. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,142
    Likes Received:
    63,369
    Trophy Points:
    113
    only need to subpoena if they have something to hide and refuse to do so voluntarily
     
  11. Reality

    Reality Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    21,660
    Likes Received:
    7,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only need a subpoena to exercise their power. No one should willingly subject themselves to a 3 ring circus a 2nd time
     
  12. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,142
    Likes Received:
    63,369
    Trophy Points:
    113
    all about the time it woudl take to get, Trump will be voted out before the fights in the court ended... but that is ok, dems will do the same and republicans will just have to deal... don't whine when the shoe is on the other foot
     
  13. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,221
    Likes Received:
    9,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The standards for criminal prosecution are different than they are for impeachment. But keep in mind that impeachment, although perceived as a political remedy, also serves to maintain a constitutional government. BUT, Mueller very specifically and VERY CLEARLY states that he could not indict him as a sitting president. Ask yourself WHY he put that in there, and then says, "but he won't have that protection once he is no longer POTUS"....hmmmmm. Hell, Stevie Wonder can see that one
     
  14. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,221
    Likes Received:
    9,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    UMMMMMM "Mrs Trump" is a paid member of his staff.....thus, she is covered under the act. So is Jared......
     
  15. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep and they complied with the act.
     
  16. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,221
    Likes Received:
    9,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no they didnt. FFS man, you cant be that dense.

    The cannot use outside servers to communicate directly with the president !
     
  17. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All communications were turned over, in accordance with the law in a timely manner in compliance with the records act.

    And there is no ban on people using outside servers, private individuals can email the president...they don’t in the case of the current potus since he doesn’t use email
     
  18. Homer J Thompson

    Homer J Thompson Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,583
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We need to see all of her emails aired out so the American people can all see what a corrupt scum she truly is. I think everyone knows but she is a democrat so it continues. She is the perfect face of the left, a lying, nasty, pig. The saddest part is the liberal voters, evidenced here, could lie to themselves even more no matter how much evidence is against her. I am so sick of the left and Hillary running around shooting her mouth off about how the election was stolen from her. What an unbelievable joke. Even the left were so grossed out by her, they couldn't vote for her. She is the democrat party. She colluded so says Trump colluded. She said voter fraud was a myth, now says it was stolen as we all know she stole it from Bernie with the help of CNN. You were lied to for two years and still being lied to and all you do is keep repeating them. When a liberal says they have issues with lies, they are lying.
     
  19. Reality

    Reality Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    21,660
    Likes Received:
    7,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only standard for impeachment is the house voted and the Senate confirmed.

    Thanks for admitting there was no BARD evidence. You're terrible at the game but thanks for playing anyway
     
  20. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,221
    Likes Received:
    9,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    jebus. READ THAT PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT
     
  21. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have. So long as someone on the chain is on an official account or it’s forwarded to someone with an official account, there is no violation...that amendment was made in 2014...
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2019
  22. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,221
    Likes Received:
    9,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So as long as their is no intent to cover classified material, then its OK right ?
     
  23. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That’s a different issue and depends. Communicating in the White House isn’t always classified material and has nothing to do with the act you cited and were wrong about
     
  24. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,221
    Likes Received:
    9,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, for you it just depends on who it is, not what they did
     
  25. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I just apply the law to the facts, try it. Clinton’s issue wasn’t the presidential records act, but the handling of classified and more importantly DOD material
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2019

Share This Page