Flight 93's missing proof

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Aug 24, 2011.

  1. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Um, yeah. That's the point I've been trying to make and pieces able to be "launched" that far have to be weighty, unlike paper or nylon that's light enough to float in the wind.

    Didn't you see all the "facts" he got wrong that I pointed out?

    Why are you being dishonest in trying to insinuate that I did that? Why can't skeptics be truthful?

    For starters, the FDR supposedly said the crash was at 40 degree, not near 90 degrees as that guy contends.

    For the others, apparently we don't deal with links around here, only "sources." Just ask Hannibal.

    Then why did you bring it up?

    Since they go to challenge your "preponderance of evidence," they are very relevant. The only distraction is you trying to make up excuses to avoid answering them.

    It's a hypothetical. Challenges your logic. No reason to run from it.

    What would be "credible sources" in your eyes for that?
     
  2. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Show me what ya got.
     
  3. cooky

    cooky New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you don't question the evidence supporting the theory that 93 was shot down with the same degree of zeal that you question the evidence supporting the official theory you do a great deal to marginalize your own credibility.

    People often allude to the possibility that 93 was shot down but no one has been able to produce any direct evidence that this actually occurred. An eyewitness who claims to have seen an A-10 is very unconvincing for many reasons. The A-10 has a 'never exceed speed' that is 8 knots slower than a 757-200s cruising speed. Whats more, the cruising speed of an A-10 is ~200 knots slower than the cruising speed of a 757. Ultimately, there are many many reasons why the A-10- a ground attack aircraft- would be ill-suited if not wholly incapable of shooting down flight 93.

    If people are going to suggest that 93 was shot down perhaps they could produce some evidence that would support how/why this was done. With the way many of you question the official story I would expect that there is a plethera of evidence that supports the shoot down of 93.
     
  4. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I'd be happy for some proof that it was buried, in any percentage, as was claimed by the FBI. Whatever "zeal" I exhibit, the proof of what "officially" happened, shouldn't be this difficult. The "official" BS story is crap. That's really the only thing that IS provable.
     
  5. diligent

    diligent New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2010
    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Another huff and puff discredited, 'pie in the sky' random hypothesis!

    What will they think of next - a secret hideout for this plane? But it's a secret hideout isn't it, so I guess we will never know where it is. What a mystery!

    This mystery could go on as long as the endless J.F. Kennedy assasination theories or, dare I say it, the endless sightings of Elvis.Wow!
     
  6. cooky

    cooky New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Personally, I think that the official accounting of flight 93 is plausible. When I look at pictures of the 'alleged' crash site it appears to me to be consistent with what the gov't alleges happened. I haven't seen evidence to make me think anything other than a 757 impacting the ground occurred at that site. I'm not sure I really understand why it is so difficult to believe that a plane going hundred of miles an hour augured into the ground... Anyone care to enlighten me?
     
  7. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You asked: "Do you have any credible sources to support the crash was staged? "

    I don't want to bother posting any sources to support my theory that you're not going to find credible, so tell me what kinds of sources will you accept as credible before I post them?
     
  8. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Do you have anything that isn't directly attribute to Killtown and his blog?
     
  9. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No witness ever claimed that. A reporter twisted Susan McElwain's words of the white wingless aircraft with a rear spoiler with fins on each side of the rear spoiler she saw fly over her van seconds before the alleged crash. In a subsequent interview, she was shown a photo of an A-10 and she said that's not what she saw. She also was shown a photo of a Lear Jet and also said no to seeing that.

    Say, what was that white wingless aircraft with a rear spoiler with fins on each side of the rear spoiler doing that she saw fly over her van seconds before the alleged crash?
     
  10. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can you please walk me through how you think the site is consistent with a 757 crashing there?
     
  11. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The site you brought up first?
     
  12. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38

    Like I said, do you have ANYTHING that isn't directly attibuted to that vermin's blog as a source of information concerning your "theory" on what happened in Shanksville?
     
  13. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As I asked DDave, which sources will you guys accept as credible?
     
  14. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    In this case, it would be much easier to start with the most glaring one that isn't acceptable.
     
  15. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ya, got that from your last two posts. Didn't need a third post about it.

    Now if you are done playing games, which sources will you accept as credible?
     
  16. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Who's playing games? I gave you a really wide berth on what could be considered credible on this particular topic: anything not Killtown.

    Is someone supposed to list every possible credible source on the internet for you? I have no idea where you going to pull stuff from.
     
  17. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you'll accept Pilots for Truth?
     
  18. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Hmm....

    I'll admit any site that has to add "for Truth" at the end doesn't instill a lot of confidence in it's objectivity.
     
  19. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Give us your best shot. What ever you think is the most credible source that you have.
     
  20. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well for the umpteenth time, which source would you accept as credible? Just give me an example.
     
  21. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Changing your toon, I see?
     
  22. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I seem pretty consistent. :mrgreen:

    Do you have trouble discerning which of your sources are most credible?
     
  23. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You sure about that?...

    Looks like you changed your toon.

    Yes. Please give me an example of a source you find credible.
     
  24. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    One that provides links to outside independent sources to backup their assertions.
     
  25. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well if that's all you wanted, I'll give you NAB's favorite site.

    Btw, got any evidence yet that most of 93 buried? Shouldn't be too hard if most a 757 really did bury.
     

Share This Page