Grand Jury Charges 1 in Breonna Taylor Case

Glad you agree with me!

 

Not true

Funny how in two sentences you went from plural to singular.....there was 1....only one.

No, I think the ones breaking down the door started it.

 

How much do you hear at 12:40 am and asleep?

 

Castle Doctrine

 

Well.......that statement had no basis in fact....at all.

 

Yes, the safest method would be to walk out to the pavement outside, kneel down and let him shoot you through the head into the asphalt. There would still be a chance of ricochet, but this could be avoided if the shooter isn't too inconvenienced by having to walk across the street to a sandy area.

In the UK they do this much more safely, through multiple stabbings to the chest. This still runs the risk of endangering bystanders with diseases in the officer's blood, but I can't see a safer alternative.

Perhaps request the ability to fork an AC plug?

 

And yet......they didn't hit the boyfriend.

 

No Castle Doctrine allows for trying to murder police officers when -- as the witness stated -- they clearly announced themselves and their intentions.

 

I would agree except that . . . it was all factual. The settlement was announced BEFORE the Grand Jury announced its decision . . . hence traditional leftist politicans race-based politics.

 

Bear that in mind the next time Dementia Joe Biden suggests that police should be able to shoot someone in the leg that's charging at them with a knife . . . as if it were a movie and the police were action heroes.

 

I honestly don't know

 

Oh right.....and no one spoke to anyone before the city made the settlement. You made the statement, prove it.

 

I just did.

 

3 guys, over 20 shots and they hit everything BUT what they were shooting at. The Gang that couldn't shoot straight.

 

Only to you and no one else.
Your "proof" is that the settlement was made before the Grand Jury announcement? You believe that is proof? That's like saying because we have winter there isn't global warming.

 

i can hear my alarm go off...i imagine i can her someone banging on my door but it’s possible i couldn’t. what’s your point?

 

1) yes it’s true
2) ok..so what a nuclear eye witness
3) no the police had a warren tot be there and followed the law. The guy had no business firing at police. The other drug dealing bf certainly has a part to plah

 

what other dozens?

 

and a eye witness as well...

it’s been a trend with dem lately to make accusations and jump to conclusions then not accept the results of imvestigations

 

Obviously that he didn't hear them say they were the police......just a knocking on the door then BAM

 

Mueller responded worse arresting old men

the warrant was for drug dealing. an inherently dangerous occupation that normally involves guns.

i am not sure when you think drug dealers operate but it’s often at night. there was nothing special about it.

 

Really? Let's see how many conservative posters disagree with my assessment.

 

I have seen nothing that said he was a former boyfriend

Witness was paid
3) no the police had a warren tot be there and followed the law. The guy had no business firing at police. The other drug dealing bf certainly has a part to plah
No business if you knew they were the police but if you didn't hear it....if they even said it.

 

maybe he didnt...but then again maybe he did and is lying because he opened fire first and shot a cop which lead to the death of his gf

he has a lot of reasons to lie. The eye witness has none

 

Ohhhh, so "proof" is based on how many "likes" you get.
The new normal