Grand Jury Charges 1 in Breonna Taylor Case

Those two things are not mutually exclusive. They CLAIM to have announced themselves but apparently not many people heard them.That is NOT how its supposed to work. There is supposed to be NO QUESTION...and yet numerous witnesses heard nothing until gunshots

And oh yea...no body cams...convenient eh?

 

This assessment is incorrect.

It was not a 'no knock' warrant, even the BF stated he heard them knocking. When he yelled who is it, he claimed he did not hear the police announce themselves.

The BF, I can't recall his name, fired his weapon at the police, not knowing who had burst through the door, and they killed him.

A tragedy, but not a murder.

 

I expect the DA to quietly offer a plea deal to the third officer and this will be forgotten by everyone but the mob.

 

Oh geez...........a crime does not have to be in process to serve a search warrant. Tell me something if you are dating a hood drug dealer who spends time in your apartment are you supposed to be surprised with violence follows and the police come knocking on your door? They had jail house recordings of the drug dealing boyfriend indicating she was party to his drug dealing. That's why they were there the false narrative that they were there by "mistake" or at the wrong house notwithstanding, her name was on the warrant.

 

After they do a couple of million in damages.

 

They are supposed to wake up the neighbors first and ask them to listen first or something???? Hearing nothing is not proof they did not announce themselves it is only proof the person didn't hear it, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

 

Serving a warrant like this in the middle of the night...breaking down a door...is by its nature a violent offense. The "cause" for this warrant was dubious at best

Who would NOT have responded in this way? Think Ruby Ridge

 

Nonsense...if they "announce" their entrance and identity...there would be no mistake

 

Enough of your claims.

Post links to all of that or admit you are L...er talking out your ass

 

So they had a warrant for a house that neither person they were looking for lived at......ever. They knocked and announced and only one person heard......so they say. They got shot at first......no kidding......the guy thought someone was breaking in just like he testified. Charge the bf for what? Shooting at someone breaking into where he's sleeping? What sense does that make?

 

not true

not true

well, when the two things aren't true that you base that statement on..........yeah, I would be surprised

Why were they there? The reason is they "heard" that the guy they were looking for had picked up a package at one time at her apartment. That should be a death sentence?

 

It's now known via a witness that the police in fact knocked and announced their identity and that the fellow inside shot at THEM before they shot back . . . everything that the leftist-allied media outlets very carefully made sure NOT to tell their leftist audiences. Curious, eh?

 

One notices that leftist allied media outlets are ALWAYS very careful NEVER to give their audience members enough information to know that there is no real point in going out and rioting since it usually has absolutely nothing to do with either racism or even careless policing.

 

they were looking for Taylor’s ex bf and had a warrant for this apartment he was known to be at

yes witnesses heard them...they testified to that affect. an independent witness

because he shot at cops, injured one, and started this

 

witnesses testified they knocked and announced. there is no question

of course the guy that opened fire on the police is gonna say he didn’t hear it

 

How does this square with the Castle Doctrine?

 

Yep . . . and especially after they have announced themselves before entering. That really irritates them. But anyway it's all moot now. No doubt all those Community Organizers that the Dem Party's leadership is going to replace police departments with in Dem Party operated cities will be MUCH better using sweet reason on hardned criminal types.

 

Of course the cops (not wearing body cams) say they announced

 

ONE witness out of a dozen supposedly hear the announcement.

 

What it says is that it is a Dem Party operated and controlled city and they wanted to make a political point having to do with the EVILS of racism . . . when it had absolutely nothing to do with racism . . . and they were careful to do so BEFORE a result was returned from the Grand Jury. But then again . . . that's leftist politicians for you.

 

When your violent boyfriend decided to engage in a shoot out with police AFTER they have announced their presence and intentions then . . . yes . . . people can die. She should have gotten a better boy friend; one not inclined to engage in a shoot out with the police.

 

That's why one officer was charged with reckless endangerment . . . but notice it was NOT murder . . . and that's because they DID announce themselves and the boyfriend decided to engage in a shoot out with the police. Ooops!

 

Objectively false. Turn off cnn

 

Again..Castle Doctrine?

 

If you did not commit a crime then you do not go to prison for a crime. It seems that some members of the political Left are very unhappy about that.