Harvey Weinstein Helped Pay for Bill Clinton’s Legal Fees During Monica Lewinsky Scandal

Public Operational charities are NOT slush funds. Do you know the difference between a private charity and a public operational one?

 

Because the Democrats nominated her last year to out her and her husband who she was complicit in he's sexual abuse of women to go back to the White House and now she claims she is appalled about Weinstein's behavior and that she claims to speaks out in support or women facing sexual abuse. She just did her nationwide book tour giving her interviews and injecting herself into the national political discourse. You want hher to go away then write her band tell her to disappear.

 

There is even talk of renominating her for President.

 

Why didn't you vote for her? What do you have against her?

 

Bill Clinton had an affair and fooled around with an intern.. Very different behavior than Cosby. Trump, Epstein and Weinstein.

 

Might be because Mittens didn't go on TV and blame the world for his failed campaign on a daily basis.

 

Bill Clinton used his power over women to solicit sex and sexually abuse and harassed subordinate employees, created a hostile work environment and then committed perjury and obstruction of justice when one of his vicitm's sued him.

 

Um, no. No on so many levels.

1) A vote for Hillary was a vote for Hillary. She doesn't get to count votes for Johnson in her vote tally.
2) Election laws 101. A party that gets 5% of the vote in an election gets labelled a "minor party" and under FEC rules qualifies for campaign funds.* (note below)
3) A vote for Johnson signified extreme dissatisfaction with the choices presented by the two major parties.

* I would think you Republican-disliking Trump fans would one, know that a 3rd party qualifies for federal money if they make a showing of over 5% of the total vote, and two, would support the idea since you don't like the Republicans any more than you like the Democrats.

 

I don't care if she goes away or not. I'm not the one peeing in my underpants every time she opens her mouth. You're confusing me with yourself and your fellow Trump fans. The people who voted for her don't start multiple threads about her every single day on here. She lives in your head and doesn't pay you a penny in rent.

 

Evidently not.. Jennifer Flowers still says he is the love of her life and Monica Lewinski adored him.

Sued him? You mean Juanita Broderick?

 

I wouldn't know what the Clinton Foundation does. I'll have to defer to experts on it. You've reported to the government that they are not in fact a charity, but are merely a political slush fund by now, I'm sure. When can we expect AG Sessions or the IRS to take some action on this improper activity?

 

Okay. And?

If you guys are so afraid of Clinton that you have to keep talking about her, that's okay. It's sad, but okay. Some people never get over people they admire but who failed. You guys think she's very powerful. Most people think she's a failure.

 

ANOTHER Weinstein thread?

The RW Fever Swamp's Weinstein Derangement Syndrome has gone from comical to PATHETIC.

It was 20 years ago. Nobody cares.

The whole Weinstein thing has been beaten to death, yet the RW continues to clutter up the forum with these REDUNDANT threads.

Once again, PF needs a separate section for these Weinstein threads.

That way, all of the members of the RW Fever Swamp who live daily with Clinton/Obama/Weinstein Derangement Syndrome can have their own little echo chamber to settle into, without cluttering up the forum with BS posts that nobody else cares about.

The RW is STILL obsessed with Weinstein?

 

You should follow twitter trends. It isn't the right wing obsessed with this, it is the left wing. We right wingers are simply enjoying it all. Liberal on liberal crime is hilarious!

 

Yeah, we're "afraid" of Clinton, both of whom are massively damaged goods:

 

So you agree the Clintons are inconsequential. Then why do you care about them so much?

 

She lives in the national political scene almost daily why do you absurdly insist she not be a topic of political discussion?

 

And both sought special favors and rewards for the sex with the powerful man. And through both created hostile workplaces and he used his power over them, do you really think either would have been involved with him except for that power and in both cases OTHER women were involved. Do you even know what the Flowers scandal was really all about? Why do you think she recorded their conversations?

No but are you so ignorant of his sexual abuse of women to think I meant her?

 

Dems have no standards.

 

For someone who is a "republican" you certainly are touchy and defensive about Hillary Clinton and her reputation.

Is it news that Harvey Weinstein donated so much to the Clinton defense fund when Bill was forced to deal with the Paula Jones harassment lawsuit (for which Bill was impeached and found to be lying under oath)?

Yes, considering that they (Bill and Harvey) are both serial abusers of women (though we are only just now discovering about Harvey) and Hillary refuses to return donations from this man that she unbelievably claims to have not known about his history of piggish attitudes towards women he was in a position to exploit.

Of course Harvey wouldn't be the first pervert that Hillary covered for all the while cynically calling herself a "feminist".
Why wouldn't this tiresome hypocritical liar Hillary, who is still in the public eye through her book flogging, be fair game for commentary
when she refuses to withdraw from the spotlight?

The better question is why is a "conservative" like you trying to deflect the spotlight from this loathsome creature?

 

FULL TILT Clinton Derangement Syndrome on display here.

This whole Weinstein thing seems to be sending PF's RW Troll Squad off of the rails.

Trump's Trainwreck of an Administration has become utterly INDEFENSIBLE.

Maybe DEFLECTION to Ancient History makes the RW Trolls feel better?

Of course, they are well aware that nobody takes the RW Troll Squad seriously.

The RW definitely needs a new shtick (beyond Clinton Derangement Syndrome and uber-lame memes).

.

 

Thanks for your usual blather and pointless drivel. Have you ever posted anything of worth? Just a rhetorical point...I know you haven't.

I would expect a Clinton butt kisser to try to change the subject but since Hillary won't return money Weinstein gave to her
and she claims not to have known what apparently so many others in power knew (that Weinstein was the Hollywood equivalent
of Bill Clinton) her denials are hollow and self serving.

This is not ancient history...this is very current due to the Weinstein revelations. So your efforts to change the subject are noted
with amusement and disgust. .

 

Collectivist have 0 standards, so they could care less what the people amongst them do. As long as your towing the collectivist line, they will hide your crimes, and defend you when you're caught.