Has Hillary disqualified herself?

And not one reason to vote FOR Hillary your bromides and platitudes notwithstanding.

And the FBI has no reasons to interview witnesses and victims..............

 

This is the problem trying to communicate with a cult member, when you show them that their beliefs are false, it only renews their strength in their beliefs, bolstered by some wacky delusional nonsense.

So, Fast and Furious was supposed to force Holder's resignation, and maybe even force Obama to resign, that was in early 2011, and guess what, Holder is still in office, and Obama got re-elected, Obama will leave office however, in January 2017.
Another belief in your Pantheon of Puzzi, is that Benghazi will destroy Hillary Clinton, and bring down the Obama Administration.
Even with the "Stain of Benghazi", Obama managed to get re-elected.
And maybe you missed this, but there were hearings, Hillary and all the big guys testified under oath, on TV, and guess what happened?

The American people were polled and AFTER the Benghazi Hearings, that were going to destroy Hillary Clinton, because there was no way she could answer those questions under oath and survive politically (that's what you believed right?)
After the very process that was supposed to destroy Hillary's career, she polls as the most respected politician in America, and the front runner for 2016.
And rather than review the process that has lead you to these spectacular divergences between your belief of how the world works and reality, you redouble your belief.
And you cling to the fantasy, that somehow the FBI is going to interview a non-commissioned officer from some posting in the Mediterranean, who is going to blow the lid off the whole shebang.

Right before the flying saucers come to take the faithful to the promised planet

 

The FBI has every reason to investigate and interview as required, which they have done quite strongly, as have many others. Thing is....the results were not likely what you had hoped for. There are a few reasons I am leaning toward Hillary, not the least of which being that people like you consider it a bad idea (which probably means the opposite), there does not seem to be anyone at this point with the intelligence and experience she has, I feel the direction our country is going to be acceptable, and the actions of the GOP in the last several years have turned me off big time.

 

Your problem is you have nothing to offer except childish name calling.

Still no reasons to vote FOR Hillary noted. And yes her being responsible for the deaths in Benghazi and her responsibilities the situation in Lybia and Syria and Iraq will be noted if she runs. Tell me why they should be ignored?

 

Oh please link me to these strong investigations, it's been a year who have they arrested. When did they interview the people who were involved in Lybia and the ME.

Please link me to the results.

So if I tell you I support her then you will vote against her. What an intellectual basis to your means of selecting Presidents.

There is no indication she is particularly intelligent or that if she is she knows what to do with it and what in her experience shows she is capable of the job?

The Democrats including Hillary have been in charge the last several years, if you are dissatisfied with it why on earth would you keep them in power?

 

Thanks....I'll pass.

 

If Hillary runs, she will be a superior candidate to the GOP candidate, is voting for the best candidate not a reason in your universe?


I'm surprised that no one has brought up Benghazi before, that's some real insight on your part, maybe they could have hearings, get Hillary under oath and then hit her with a set of questions that she couldn't possibly answer without destroying her career.........Oh, wait they did, so can you tell me why it seems that the entire American public, with the exception of a small cult, have found nothing in the Benghazi affair that is damaging to Hillary?

 

Didn't think you could back it up.

 

Based on what? In way will she be superior?

They already had her under oath and she said it didn't matter what happened. But since she is responsible for that failure and the resulting deaths and then lied about it later, as in continuing to say it was because of the video even telling the families that was the casue why would you vote for her?

 

She will be better presidential material than the GOP nominee

And millions of people saw that and decided that she should be the next president, and you think that 2 years from now they will see it again and vote against her?
Based on what? Because you don't like her?

 

Based on what? What has she been better at?

Millions didn't but will she that she is responsible for those deaths and the slap in the face to the US and lack of action about it and her infamous "what does it matter".

But do tell me what about the Benghazi attacks and the deaths on her hands makes you want to vote for her?

Her incompetence, her lack of leadership, her poor performance as SecState. Her lack of any track record of accomplishment in anything she in which she has been engaged.

 

In other words, millions of people saw that testimony and decided she'd make a great president, but you, who didn't like her before, still don't like her, so you assume that all those people who think she'd make a great president, will come around to your way of thinking, in a couple of years....

Based on the fact, that you never liked her.....and you imagine you have good reasons for not liking her, you have heard plenty of good reasons not to like her on the radio over the years....

 

Still waiting for those reasons to vote for her, millions of people saw that testimony and decided she would not make a great president because of it. What in her testimony gives reason to vote FOR her? What about her being responsible for the deaths of those people and the subsequent lying about it would make her a good President?

 

What do you think it was that convince the American public that she'd make a great president?
Was it her leadership, her command of the facts?
And why do you keep accusing her of lying, is that something you made up or were you told to think that?
I mean, here's a little lesson in discerning reality, if she lied, she would be charged with perjury, which hasn't happened.
And if she lied, she would have been accused of lying by someone who was somewhat credible and while there are accusations, none of them come from anyone who is even close to being "reliable", they come from hyper partisan whack jobs, as FOX news editorials.
Guess what, you've been fooled again. What's this, one hundred and fifty four times in a row.....

 

I asked YOU what about her and he career accomplishment would make her a great President?

What about her handling of Benghazi and the deaths she is responsbile for makes her a great candidate for President?

What leadership? What is the leadership she showed in Benghazi?

Like it was all because of a video, that command of the facts. Why does her wrongfully telling the world and the famlies it was because of the video when she knew different a good reason to make her the next President?

Her calling Assad a reformer and counseling we should support him a command of the facts?

ROFL her supposed ignorance of her husband's abuse of women command of the facts?

She lied to the families when she told them the attack was because of the videos, she was told that night it was a terrorist attack and no one ever told the state department it was because of a video.

Could be charged with perjury.

"A congressional report shows security cuts before the Benghazi attack were approved by the secretary of state and that White House talking points describing the events were edited to protect the State Department.
The "progress" report by House Republicans will no doubt be dismissed as a partisan political document. But it effectively records administration efforts to ignore the threat of terrorism before the attack on our diplomatic mission in Benghazi, to cover up administration culpability afterward and to sweep aside responsibility for the deaths of four Americans to make the administration look caring and competent.
Despite then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's denials that pleadings from Ambassador Chris Stevens, killed in the terrorist attack, never reached her desk, the interim Benghazi report concludes that:
"Reductions of security levels prior to the attacks in Benghazi were approved at the highest levels of the State Department, up to and including Secretary Clinton. This fact contradicts her testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on January 23, 2013."


Read More At Investor's Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...llary-clinton-benghazi-lies.htm#ixzz2eRhq8fPK
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook

And through Cattelgate, Filegate, Bill Recordsgate, Fostergate and Whitewater/Castle Grande and her husband's treatment of women she has a history of lying.

I wouldn't get snarky if I was you, you could end up looking very very foolish not knowing the facts as you don't.

 

the democrat puppets will always vote for the person their party tells them to..even though they dont have to they do..they just cant think for themselves..

 

Her most shining moment in the Senate was when she rallied Democrats to vote to authorize Bush to use military force to remove Saddam from power. And they support her? The policy they so totally disdain, for which they wanted Bush's head, she was one of the most strident supporters, she unequivocal about her support, and they want her to be President.

Just amazing.

 

And now it comes, the list of "Clinton Crimes", and how does she manage to avoid prosecution?
Do you ever wonder that? Why it's the Republicans who actually get prosecuted, who plead guilty, who get convicted, who go to prison.
Does that suggest something to you?
Like maybe all this BS about Hillary Clinton isn't real, it's just propaganda.....maybe, huh?

 

LOL...what a surprise.

Ahhh the thought put into a leftwing Ballot cast.....

- - - Updated - - -

They're simply captivated by the gender, and the cool Historic headlines. Nothing more than that Bluesguy. Shallow people like Shallow achievements.

 

When you have Hillary and the Democrats supporting her it's not hard to be funny. It's easy to make absurdity sound funny.

Still no reasons to vote FOR her.

 

Robert Ray explained it quite well in his searing final report but to top the list, two key witnesses go to jail instead of testifying and one dies in jail before he can.

No since Democrats get arrest and go to jail.

No. Tell me this how exactly did she make all that money in cattle futures, you know where the broker went to jail.

 

​

Disgruntled Repubs, chronically impotent at coming up with a viable presidential candidate of their own, will again intensify another of their fatuous slimefests.

The GOP's Fox may produce a tv movie with the otherwise indolent Darryll Issa as a lovable Inspector Columbo unraveling the sinister machinations of Vince Foster's cold-blooded killer, and in the process exposing her true identity as a foreign-born Muslim socialist hellbent on turning Michelle's vegetable garden into the killing fields of Pennsylvania Avenue whilst concealing her embarrassing tax returns and stashing a boodle in overseas shelters rather than patriotically investing it in America.

The part of Ms C will be played by the stunning Rudy Giuliani, yet another of the GOP's denizens of their Boulevard of Broken Dreams.

​

 

Still no reason to vote FOR Hillary.

 

Really, Robert Ray's "searing final report", why no charges?

How can the right come up with a list of Clinton Crimes that goes on for pages, and not file a single charge?
I'll give you a clue.
When you accuse someone of something, and produce evidence, they get prosecuted.
When you accuse someone of a new crime everyday, and produce no evidence, then even if there is a real crime tucked in there among the 300 other lunatic assertions, the person is saved by the fact that they are the target of crazy people. Maybe cattle futures would be hard to explain, if that was the only thing Hillary had been accused of, but by accusing her of murder, rape, mayhem, masterminding drug smuggling operations, espionage, treason, bribery, wanton sexual behavior, sleeping with half the men in Arkansas, being frigid, being a lesbian, you brand yourself as irrational, and all she has to say in her defense, is "look who's making the charge", and guess what?

 

I gave you the top reasons. The two top witnesses went to jail rather than testify under oath. One died in jail and one committed suicide.

Not to hard but give me your explanation of how she made a killing in cattle futures.