I watched, I believe Kavanaugh and not Ford, the whys behind.

Why yes, he's the ring leader of a gang rape party gang....Boy's lined up for their turn in the hallways of suburban DC.....

You people are shameful.

 

What will happen, Trump base?

Depends on the investigation: if it comes back questionable concerning K's character, Collins et al will send him back to the minors.

 

Doesn't add up. If you remember everyone at the party you remember how you got to the party. This party that nobody else remembers was obviously all in her head.

 

What you are writing does not comport with the testimony, josephwalker.

 

You saw what you wanted to see.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/kavanaugh-lied-senate-judiciary-committee.html

 

#6

He was a 17 year old ATHLETE. She was a fifteen year old girl

 

We don't believe people's claims because they said so(or we used to be skeptical of claims, and demanded proof.) The stunning thing is, we're not demanding proof from Christine Ford(probably, a subtle, not wanting to admit fact that she can't provide any) but we're going to try and find it ourselves ROFL.

It's absurd. Because certain sects of America have determined that breasts and a uterus mean that everything a woman says is true and factual, and everything the man says must in these cases be a lie.

The whole "we're made equal" part is utterly discarded, depending on agenda. And if you can discard a philosophical belief, it means you don't believe it. So let's stop preaching about equality if it's something we don't really believe.

 

Of course Ford's story isn't credible.

That's irrelevant to Democrats.

 

The two posts above are not credible, while Ford's is.

 

True, which is why Ford wanted a FBI investigation into the current allegations.

Kavanaugh did not want a FBI investigation which is proven in the first few minutes of this video.

 

He said, and I will quote again and again until you become an honest American: "Whatever the Committee decides." And the Committee decided it wanted an FBI investigation and asked Trump to do that, which he did.

Your lack of honesty means you have no business, none, criticizing Donald Trump. Why? Because you're just like Trump. You want to twist a narrative in your favor, regardless of whether it's actually real or not. So you criticizing Trump is hollow.

 

In his book, Mark Judge describes one of his acquaintances at the time, someone named “Bart O’Kavanaugh,” who vomited in a car after a party.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ged-kavanaugh-assault/?utm_term=.0d1d8c0021f7

Judge's book is entitled "Wasted: Tales of a Gen X Drunk." Judge is a recovering alcoholic.

In one passage of the book in a chapter titled "A Functioning Alcoholic," senior year students, including Judge, lamented the news that they would be spending Sundays during their senior year doing community service.

"'We have to do something,' I said. 'They can't get away with this our senior year.'
"'What are we going to do?' Shane said, laughing. 'Drink a hundred kegs and brag about it?'
"No one laughed. For a second, no one even spoke. 'It's brilliant,' I said."
Judge and his high school buddies went on to create a newspaper called the Heretic, a riff on their school newspaper the Saint. One of the main objectives of the paper, as laid out by Judge in the book, was to chronicle "the 100-keg quest and everything that happened on the way."
According to his book, Judge and his friends continued to publish and anonymously distribute the paper on campus, with a continued emphasis on the 100-keg quest in the pages. Judge wrote that by March of his senior year, the keg count was "into the mid-eighties."
In "Wasted," Judge also describes an exchange with a young woman at a party when talk arose of a friend who puked in a car.
"Do you know Bart O'Kavanaugh?"
"Yeah. He's around here somewhere."
"I heard he puked in someone's car the other night."
"Yeah. He passed out on his way back from a party."

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/22/politics/mark-judge-books-details-keg-quest/index.html

It is a relatively easy task to find out if there was a classmate of Judge's named Bart O'Kavanaugh along with his friend Brett Kavanaugh. That would be a remarkable coincidence.

 

Yes, I know, and he knew that the Republican majority on the committee would not call for a FBI investigation, so that was easy to say. The committee was forced to call the investigation by Flake and the fact that they didn't have the votes without it.

The point is, Kavanaugh did not answer Harris's question. That is a sign of guilt. Even you can see that.

 

Except they DID, led by Republican Senators Flake and McConnell. Whether he answered indirectly or directly said FBI, he nevertheless answered in the affirmative. You just wanted to hear him say the words "FBI".

Which is dishonest. Which is what the Left's been. Using a mentally damaged woman as a political prop is extraordinarily low. Democrats need to be punished at the polls for this stunt.

 

The Trumpbase keep denying that K would not answer the question if he wanted an investigation. Saying he would do what the committee wanted is not the same as wanting an investigation. Everyone knew the Committee GOP did not want an investigation. Stop the lying.

 

And yet, that is PRECISELY what the Committee asked for, isn't it? How can anyone predetermine what the Committee would have wanted? How can Democrats predetermine that?

The ones lying, are the ones trying(as they have for the last two weeks) to paint a dishonest picture of Judge Kavanaugh.

 

Huh? That was sort of a muddled reply. Flake forced McConnell's hand. Do you really think McConnell would have asked the White House for a FBI investigation while agreeing to a week's delay in the vote without Flake? Do you really believe that?

If so, you have not been paying attention. McConnell was planning a confirmation vote on Tuesday. You didn't know that, either? Wow!

 

Is this a dishonest picture of Kavanaugh? Kavanaugh and Judge were friends. This is from Judge's book.

"Do you know Bart O'Kavanaugh?"
"Yeah. He's around here somewhere."
"I heard he puked in someone's car the other night."
"Yeah. He passed out on his way back from a party."

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/22/politics/mark-judge-books-details-keg-quest/index.html

It is a relatively easy task to find out if there was a classmate of Judge's named Bart O'Kavanaugh along with his friend Brett Kavanaugh. That would be a remarkable coincidence.

If you think this is dishonest, please explain. Don't just say it is dishonest. Explain and be specific.

 

Keyser....


Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford," lawyer Howard J. Walsh said in a statement sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Keyser previously coached golf at Georgetown University and is now executive producer of Bob Beckel's podcast. Keyser is the ex-wife of Beckel, a former Democratic operative and commentator. A search on OpenSecrets.org reveals Keyser's only political donation has been to former Democratic senator Byron Dorgan.

Keyser's denial, as a female lifelong friend and Ford's last named witness, is the most consequential development that has occurred since Ford publicly stepped forward last Sunday and detailed her allegations to the Washington Post. Ford's allegation of the 1982 incident was told to no one until a 2012 therapy session, when Kavanaugh was first touted in the media as the most likely GOP Supreme Court nominee.

All of Ford's named witnesses of the party, both male and female, have now denied any recollection of attending such a party.....snip~

https://www.weeklystandard.com/john...ss-denies-ever-attending-party-with-kavanaugh


Ah.....the Reality of where Ford actually stands. No evidence, and her witnesses all denying the event ever took place. Loss of all credibility. Just like the Demos and their Collective.

Tell Ford to quit taking all of those Medications before trying to recover memories.

 

According to Brett, the book is a largely fictional accounting. Using a fictional book to find out the truth of these events, is about as asinine as taking the testimony of a mentally damaged woman(Christine Ford) seriously.

That's literally what this boils down to, someone damaged in the head, with a fraudulent account. Her best friend doesn't want to say outright that it never happened, but that she can't 'confirm it'. The best legal way of answering, without sending Ford into whatever psychiatric frenzy would tip her off.

It just boggles the mind that common sense is not seen by most Americans, because you dislike Brett Kavanaugh. He could be defeated in the vote politically, without this stunt.

The stunt just makes the Dems look like Trump 2.0. But without Nationalist policies.

 

Yea well...

 

We already know Ms. Leland is going to repeat her testimony to the FBI. So her story is unchanged. That in of itself is already a significant blow to this farce. If the FBI collaborates Mark Judge, would there be apologies in order for Kavanaugh?

Because it's one thing for a political up and down defeat vote. It's another thing to believe false slander by someone who clearly isn't up there in the head(Christine Ford.)

 

No, the Democrats did not ask that, AN. They asked if he, Judge K, wanted an investigation, and he would not say 'yes' or 'no.' Anyone who denies that is painting a dishonest picture of what the Dems were asking.

 

That is what they asked for. And Kavanaugh said whatever the committee wanted(and they are apart of the committee, are they not?) Their dishonesty, their play of words doesn't work because it's not 1932, it's 2018. We have the internet, we know.

Just like we know Christine Ford is the one with the burden of proof who can't possibly raise it, but that doesn't stop anyone from entertaining this farce.

 

That was what the Senators were asking, K would not answer the question, and that was where his dishonesty was obvious.

You are defending a dissembling man.

Yes, Ford was believable. And K? Not so much.