Lesbian woman demands double standard when she has sex with 15-year-old

Man, 20, charged with having lewd relationship with underage girl

20 y/o charged....Not 18 y/o...FAIL

Midlothian Man Accused of Sexual Relationship with Underage Girl

22 y/o charged...Not an 18 y/o.....FAIL

As stated before you have nothing but myth fearing bigoted wild accusations.

- - - Updated - - -

Does anyone else notice the hypocrisy of using the term labels, with 'leftist loser'?

Typical RW myth fearing hypocrisy.

 

Well, you know. The devil is in the details my man. Details.

 

Yea, you know FLA. See, we are still part of the US. Not commie mexico north.

 

absolutely, all of here are making casting opinions and making judgements before the trial has even begun, none of us know all the details of the defense or the prosecution...

 

I agree. (*)(*)(*)(*) her.

 

I always thought that gays wanted equal rights? No, they want to be exempt from the laws and have special rights apparently.

 

Guess you did not get the memo, equal rights is a codeword for special treatment.

Not sure how you can call it homophobia when 17- and 18-year-old boys have been charged with sex crimes because of their relationships, or encounters, with 15- or 14-year-old girls. I do think a 15 year sentence would be a little harsh though, she will most likely get probation and the sex offender label of course

 

She was given probation and she and her parents refuse to accept that and worse she refuse to accept guilty for having sex with a minor she and her parents wants the public to accept same sex regardless of age as long as their is consent this is what they wanted. So they took this whole case to the public to get the public to support their immoral acts.

 

Where do these people come from? It is well documented that men get punished harsher in this country for crimes such as murder and sexual assaults. And this dumb broad wants to make it a sexuality issue? No wonder she is a lesbian, shes too stupid to ever find a man that will treat her right. Better to just play around with girls and be crazy together.

 

what makes her special ? she has already confessed to committing a felony

http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/my-18-year-old-son-had-sex-with-a-13-year-old--wha-1064145.html

 

I agree, I was not aware of such a thing, thanks. Seems as if this case meets all the criteria

Florida’s “Romeo and Juliet” Petitio
n Process under s. 943.04354, F.S.
Section 943.04354, F.S., provides a process allowing a motion
7
or petition
8
for removal of the requirement to
register as a sexual offender or sexual predator for qualif
ying “Romeo and Juliet” o
ffenders who meet specific
criteria outlined in the statute. Most notably
, the victim must be at least 14 years-old,
9
the offender no more than 4
years older than the victim at the time of the
offense, and the victim must have consented
10
to the sexual conduct.
Qualifying offenses for consideration of registration
relief by the court fall under the following statutes:
s. 794.011, F.S. (sexual battery); s.
800.04. F.S. (lewd or lascivious offe
nses committed upon or in the presence of
persons less than 16 years of age); s. 827.071, F.S.
11
(sexual performance by a child); or s. 847.0135(5), F.S.
12
(certain computer transmissions prohibited).

 

At the time of the alleged crime, she was 18 and the victim was 14. So despite your attempt to mislead, there is greater than a 2 year difference in ages.

 

Does not change the fact that one was a 12th Grader, and the other a 10th. You suppose they're the first 10th and 12th Grade couples to have sex in the history of the country? I'd wager thousands of them are doing so at this exact moment.

 

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but there's absolutely nothing in the law that mention what grade the individuals are in makes any difference whatsoever.

Facts are facts, even when you hate to hear it: One was 18, the other was 14.

 

Well, let me be very clear then. If it was a consensual, pre-existing relationship prior to the older one turning 18, I don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*). Going after 2 kids, ruining BOTH of their lives because of a consensual relationship is not what Liberty is about.

 

So you are saying that gays and lesbians should have the right to have sex with minors! It is this kind of reasoning and lesbian-gay logic that clearly demonstrate how abnormal they are.

 

This is about having sex with a minor! Why don't you just say and fight for the right to have sex with minors and while you are at it please include everyone including heterosexual people their right to have sex with minors with consent this include offering minors candies to get their consent!

Both of their lives will be ruin because of the irresponsible parents of Hunt and Hunt who went public selfishly thinking of her self only and not about the 14 year old. Miss lebian Hunt should be punish for her crime to the fullest!

Same sex people and their supporters speak very aggressively in defense of lesbian Hunt but not about the 14 year old.

 

They won't understand it believe me because they are homosexuals.

 

She could do the house arrest and then petition for relief from the reporting requirement. She has top prove herself reliable before she gets special treatment in order to pursue her chosen career.

There are plenty of girls who could qualify to be nurses if they could get financial aid for school who have not diddled a minor. THey deserve the opportunity without having to compete with a sleaze.

 

There is a HUGE difference between a "technically" adult person, and a truly mature victimizor and predator. It seems your homophobia is clouding your vision. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the gender of the two parties, only whether or not it was non-coerced informed consent. You appear to be more concerned about the fact that it was a same sex relationship than the age difference. Quite telling, I would say.

 

Ignoring the fact that the only public statement made by the victim's family was the it wasn't consensual, there are laws that say 14 years old is simply too young to provide consent. Yes I know that the accused can petition for a "Romeo and Juliet" exemption, but she better hope the victim doesn't say the same thing her parents said.

 

If it WASN'T consensual, then EVERYTHING I've said about it is retracted. But if it was, given the fact that it pre-existed the older girls 18th birthday, I maintain my position. I don't and can't know the truth. Your post is the first I've heard that anyone said it was not consensual. Doesn't mean you're right, doesn't mean your wrong. You either are or you aren't. If it goes to trial, and the younger girl takes the stand and begs the jury to acquit, they should. If she begs the jury to convict, they should. That is the bottom line.