Long-term Lancet study, vaccines don’t prevent death

Long-term Lancet study, vaccines don’t prevent death​

~ Those of us who are paying attention know this. The most concerning it that it appears the mRNA vaccine can actually cause death .

 

Many many diseases that we vaccinate for have not gone away but we see the. So infrequently now that the impact is not there

 

No, nothing of the kind. You confirmed all I was wondering, that your thread is not based on the Lancet Study, nor even offers a link to it. Just because a source is one of numerous, that come up under a given Google search, is not an excuse to use that search phrase, for any of those article hits-- ridiculous justification, you're pedaling. But I'm not going to waste my time arguing with you about it. It's breaking the forum rules, but I couldn't give a crap, about that. It is also deceptive of you, but if that's the way you roll, it's good to know. You have a blast with it; you've just destroyed any credibility you or this doctor may well have had, in my mind, had you not tried to masquerade Nass's work, under a different name.

 

A compilation of peer-reviewed medical papers finds the defendant, covid mRNA shots, guilty of the following,

https://community.covidvaccineinjur...wed-medical-papers-of-covid-vaccine-injuries/

 

Birth rates in Australia plummet, I wonder why? [sarcasm]

 

Actually any substance can cause death - in fact one of the most common chemicals on the planet is Dihydrogen Monoxide - it kills so many each year.

https://www.dhmo.org/

 

Hur hur hur! That is the same strategy that the FHMO website uses! Thanks for the laugh

 

Truth is we have had a negative birth rate off and on for about 40 years


https://www.statista.com/statistics/976714/crude-birth-rate-in-australia/

 

the vaccine reduces the risk of hospitalization and death

 

Oh, I see what your problem is.
Your purpose in this thread is to blame me for something I had nothing to do with.
I highly recommend that you contact the author and really tell her off.
She posted her email just for you!

So just send her a nastygram, Im sure it will make you feel much better!

 

with 41,000 adverse affects some that include death, Im not so sure about that, do you have a study that took long term issues it caused into account?

 

yes, and the thrust of the thread demonstrates that the vax does not immunize!



we can see that deaths increase with more jabs
secondly we can see that there is little to no difference between vaxed and unvaxed rates.
the cdc stopped collecting that data once they saw that yet went on to pedal it anyway hoping no one would notice lol
In fact we can see that after the second injection the vaxed mortality rate actually exceeds the unvaxed!

New Zealand a country with over 90% compliance across the board coming off the lockdowns is a perfect example vaxers pretend does not exist.



These people should be totally immune!
They arent!


Then we look at the vaxd vs unvaxd


what these vaxers are claiming simply does not reflect from the 'actual' data where at times the vaxed mortality is greater than the unvaxd! wtf?



The vaxed mortality is increasing trends up while the unvaxed mortality trends down!
This alleged vaccine provides no immunization qualities what so ever.
Its no different than taking an aspirin every time you get a headache!
What a farce! Next we will be claiming aspirin is a vaccine!

 

Vaccines will never prevent people from dying; as they say, dying is part of life.

But they will prevent you from dying from Covid. Innumerable studies have show us this.

Didn't "The Lancet" retract its studies on hydroxychloroquine? *LOL* Why yes, it did. The Lancet has been off its game, to be sure.

 

There's no contradiction. The answer is right in your post. "This group also had the highest percentage of people with very poor health from May 2021, giving explanation to the high mortality rates." People who get the extra booster are more likely to be in poor health, and therefore are more likely to die because of their poor health. The site itself admits it did not adjust for comorbidities. And I'm not sure why you keep selecting the later portions of the first graph when the first part of the graph clearly shows that vaccination helped during the 2nd wave. After that, the death rate was too low in general to make a comparison particularly by just eyeballing a graph that doesn't control for all confounders.

 

If you're trying to make me laugh, you succeeded.

 

And if you paid attention to the data provided in the video, you'll understand the drastic drops in November and December of 2021. A stark contrast to previous years.

 

This is the first link in the article.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602221000409

So when one who finds it amusing that the 'science' they believe in is challenged, their Hippocratic oath goes out the window, hey?

 

Giggles.

 

@Bowerbird
Oh, look. Another from the site, you laugh at.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34487236/

 

Not according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Proven again, you don't watch or read videos or articles posted.

 

F

no I don’t waste time on conspiracy theories - you want me to do that prove it is worthwhile

And I certainly don’t take my stats from some TWONK on YouTube I get my stats from the ABS itself

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/births-australia/2021

There was an increase in births

 

A case report - when have I said that no vaccine has side effects or is completely safe?

 

I think of it as evolution in action

Feel free to show you own vulnerabilities but when you try and take others with you I will show your fallacies

 

I did not say the science articles were wrong only that the strategies used to portray them were wrong. Cherry picking and misrepresentation are only a start

This is from the DHMO site

https://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

not one issue they have on the website is essentially untrue and the way it is written would have you greatly concerned about DHMO until you work it out Di (two) hydrogen Mono (one) oxide (oxygen) = H2O. = water.

Your websites are playing this trick. And it is an old trick from the tobacco industry playbook. Present the information in such a way that you will get a response from those who do not see the “trick”

 

its in your face, no hairs need to be split and it also shows variance so Im not sure why your having those problems, however according to your metric, from the graphs, we can say being unvaxed helped!