mRNA Vaccines, Proven toxic, shuts down your immune system

1
By who's authority is it misinformation, source citations please.
You have nothing more than an opinions.

2 if you think there's no reasonable proof then it appears maybe you haven't understood the information provided in this and other threads.

I don't know what link you got that from but it's a total lie the amount of DNA present exceeded the FDA limitations by sometimes over a hundred times in some canadian vials and that also has been posted in the thread.

Post your source.

Once again I don't know where you're digging up that lie from either since I posted a chart showing the DNA markers where it in fact entered into the human genome.

Post your source.

Appearances can be deceiving when you don't seem to understand the principles behind how it this all works, I highly recommend that you listen to the doctors I have posted as they explain it quite well so you can better understand what's going on.

3
Again absolutely there is "reasonable" proof, again provided in the links and lectures given in the thread. This isn't about philosophy.

4
They're absolutely as turbo cancer it's a fact proven by several oncologists in clinic and known patients throughout the United States and elsewhere in the world, just another issue you don't seem to understand yet you post away.

So you think Hiroshima is a good rebuttal ... cant wait to see the source for that one!

5
Please stop calling what you clearly have no evidence for misinformation.

Like I said it is proven insofar as reasonable proof is concerned as far as extremism is concerned no you can't prove anything whatsoever.

 

BTW

Im not going to chase through several threads addressing different subjectS to hunt down every reference I posted just because you or anyone else try to combine all of them in one thread.

 

Start here: lipid nano particles doped with N1-methylpseudouridine.

 

I dont think I posted this one yet.

@MuchAdo Explained in much more detail here.

 

No it proved that you cannot answer rebuttal. Your only source for this made up crap is a useless video. You steadfastly fail to answer simple observations.

• In the video you cited for "turbo" cancer, it lies about the CEO talking about this made up "turbo" cancer. Show where he says this please. I have identified him saying "battle cancer" and your lying video maker is either deaf or dishonest.
• The cited video mentions two companies that make cardiovascular drugs for myocarditis and pericarditis. I proved they don't - a total lie..
• I have cited official figures showing the rise of cancer and it is not significant.
• There is not single iota of evidence that covid-19 vaccines cause cancer. That is a lie inferred by your video.

 

Exactly.

 

Isn't Factchecl.org a division of the Democrat party?

 

Does it matter? All the information about these people is available at other multiple sources. It is not a ‘division’ of the Democrat party.

 

So, any Fact Check organization is to be believed because they claim they do not spin things?

 

So all batshit conspiracy sites tell the "truth"?

 

FactCheck.org is a well-known far-left group of political assassins.

 

Did I say that? Of all the people that I commented on, I looked at multiple sources and generally linked to one source. If you disagree with the quotes, why not say so instead of attacking a source because you don’t like that it tends to lean to the left?

 

Evasion, try again!

So all batshit conspiracy sites tell the "truth"?

 

This is false information that is dangerous to the public.

This thread should be deleted.

 

The Senate committee disagrees with you, so your post is misinformation and should be deleted!

 

The Senate? Alrighty then!

We know for a fact the FDA lied, we know for a fact the CDC deleted negative VAERS data.

talk about a RICO operation!

 

Ron Johnson doesn't hold committee hearings
More disinformation

 

More disinformation and another one of your posts that should be deleted, he is on 4 committees.

 

6,000 VAERS reports were deleted for being foreign entries, CDC says | Reuters
"Archives of the CDC page in question here show the increase and decrease in the number of deaths reported to VAERS.
An archived version of the page captured at 17:41 GMT on July 20 shows 6,079 reports of deaths (here).
The next capture was taken at 21:02 GMT on July 20 showing 12,313 reports of deaths (here).
The number reverted back to 6,079, as seen in a capture at 18:54 GMT on July 21 (here). It was then updated to 6,207 reports of death in a capture at 01:39 GMT on July 22 (here)."

No, it's just more very uninformed conspiracy batshit.

 

Guys on committees don't hold hearings.
CHAIRMEN hold hearings.
Johnson chairs no committees.

THEREFORE
Every claim you've made here is false and its purpose is to spread disinformation.

 

Actually, I want to revise the bolded conclusion. I am totally convinced that one of the extremely dishonest misinformation websites, deliberately grabbed hold of the faulty data, just so they can make the lying claim about data being deleted.

Eager and gullible posters, keen to find absolutely anything, act as their gophers posting this lie without checking it. Almost certainly with no possible chance of ever believing anything that refutes the lie.

 

I guess they just discriminated against the rest of the foreign data and left it there.

 

As I said!

 

as I said

 

But you didn't! Spamming your same graph and ignoring the very simple explanation is exactly the point I made! The data was a human error - clearly the data doubled between 17:41 GMT on July 20 and 21:02 GMT on the same damn day!
Corrected back to 6,079, when the error was spotted.

It is utterly sickening that conspiracy theorist websites DO this sort of crap, but nauseating that people who read it without checking it, then repeat it! Then even more nauseating, is that they refuse at all costs to accept simple explanations!