As I said...."no sitting President". Seems like we are on the same page, since all sitting presidents lie about everything.
So? Congress has always had the authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority to protect the integrity of the administration of justice. The key words to that point, and what the left apparently are being directed to filter out is: "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."
Doubtful.. You did something wrong in your post somehow and will be banned for flamebait or being offtopic or anything.... Most of these threads will poof.
Fricking Hillary Clinton paid the foreign agent Christopher Steele to write a dirty dossier of made up crap. Hello! Anybody home?????
I only do right? We will be much stronger then we were in 2016. 1 free thinker is worth a 1000 drones
They went on and on about the Trump team's attempt to get Hillary's hacked e-mails. Hello! Hillary's homebrew bathroom server was hacked! Anybody home????
One the Date of March 16th 2013 what did you have for Breakfast? Answer: the typical 2 eggs and 2 pieces of bacon and two cups of coffee Come on now we know for a fact on March 16th 2013 you had only one cup of coffee and we have two people willing to testify under oath to that.. So WHICH IS IT ONE OR TWO!!!!! The above would be "lying" to a Government official...
From the report The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment,” the report stated. “At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.” So maybe “not proved”. Or more accurately, indictability of the president should be handled by the justice dept or the congress But donald trump not exonerated, mueller finding was NOT a finding of no collusion and or no obstruction
Dear Democrats, Please, please PLEASE attempt to impeach Trump based on the Mueller report. Is want to see Washington burn. Lovingly, An anarchist who is handing you a match book.
What comes after? "it also does not exonerate him." But let's not forget, "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, …." came after Mueller: "...employed 19 lawyers who were assisted by a team of approximately 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants, and other professional staff. The Special Counsel issued more than 2,800 subpoenas, executed nearly 500 search warrants, obtained more than 230 orders for communication records, issued almost 50 orders authorizing use of pen registers, made 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence, and interviewed approximately 500 witnesses." Obviously that is not enough for those reeling in disappointment Trump wasn't eliminated.
He was, unquestionably, exonerated of collusion, and the intent to obstruct cannot be proved. So, we're left with impeachment. Bring it on.
Sounds like Mueller is stating he did not do a thorough investigation.. I guess 18 aids and 2 years was not enough? He doesnt have "confidence" but admits a lack of "facts" backing up his lack of confidence.. Amazing.
Keep in mind, "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, …." came after Mueller: "...employed 19 lawyers who were assisted by a team of approximately 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants, and other professional staff. The Special Counsel issued more than 2,800 subpoenas, executed nearly 500 search warrants, obtained more than 230 orders for communication records, issued almost 50 orders authorizing use of pen registers, made 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence, and interviewed approximately 500 witnesses."
There was certainly a finding of "No Collusion" by Trump and his campaign. There was a finding of "he made things difficult, but did not obstruct based on legal standards" on the obstruction issue.
Perhaps with 40 lawyers the entire FBI 5000 subpoenas and 1000 search warrants they might have done better.. IMPEACH!!!!!
if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.”
ROFL! Please! Please! Please let them do it! I remember how many seats the Republicans did it when Clinton lied to a Federal Judge. This will be even worse for the Democrats!
Ok, so on the obstruction charge; how on earth is the attempt to remove/replace the Special Counsel by the President (successful or otherwise) with the clear intent of stopping the investigation, NOT obstruction?? How???
