New Video From A&E for 9/11 truth

Discussion in '9/11' started by ar10, Sep 18, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    If Building 7 was the target, why take out the towers and hit the Pentagon? Would it not be simpler to blow up Building 7 and blame it on terrorists since they had tried to blow up the towers in the past? Why make the conspiracy so huge and complicated?

    And HOW have they kept all the co-conspirators quiet for the last 10 years?
     
    Patriot911 and (deleted member) like this.
  2. _Lisa_

    _Lisa_ New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0

    No, actually.....do you deny that Jews dominate media ownership in the US?
     
  3. _Lisa_

    _Lisa_ New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you have the roster? Lets see it.
     
  4. _Lisa_

    _Lisa_ New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0

    How about YOU....do YOU deny that Jews dominate media ownership in the US?
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What does that have to do with anything? Bigoted assumptions prove no science.
     
  6. Wanderer

    Wanderer New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oy vey!:omg:
     
  7. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    If you're skeptical about ANY aspects, then research them further until you have a better idea of whether or not you are or are not skeptical of the particular aspect you are supposedly seeking a truthful answer to. Sounds to me like you've already made your conclusions. Go through WTC7, and if you find nothing wrong with that picture, don't waste any more of your time, because it would be pointless. Good day and enjoy your research.
     
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow.......talk about reaching!
     
  9. _Lisa_

    _Lisa_ New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0

    It's NOT an assumption, little man...it's a FACT....and if that fact didn't have uncomfortable implications for you, you wouldn't be tossing around words like BIGOT.
     
  10. _Lisa_

    _Lisa_ New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Tis true.

    Where at in Philly are you? I'm right over the bridge in S. Jersey.
     
  11. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah the fire at that particular location may not have been so bad.. There were still bad fires elsewhere.
     
  12. ar10

    ar10 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    49 core collums. 4" thick at the base. In order to fall a building at free fall speed, all support collums need to turn to liquid at precice locations, times and intervals. It is only possible to bring a structure straight down, with controlled demolution.

    "bad fires" in a class A fire rated highrise, does not bring down buildings.
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In this instance,it was more than just FIRES, and you KNOW it.
     
  14. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    The truly ignorant refuse to address the core columns. They would have to have had assistance in getting out of the way, to allow for the near free fall speed at which the buildings fell. Vertical (that's UP AND DOWN, NORTH AND SOUTH). What happened to them? They all snapped in what.. 10 or 12 seconds? The only way those buildings could have fallen in the actual time they fell, is for them to have been virtually hollow. Remove the core columns, and guess what? Instant hollow shell. Go smash an upright nail, or better yet, a GROUP of nails together, with a hammer and observe. Same premise here. The "nails" went somewhere, but, they didn't just bow out of the way.
     
  15. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes...we know it. That's what we're trying to convey.
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No,you're just making stuff up
     
  17. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No sir. The fable has been created by your team.
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No sir, your crew has forgotten the old adage 'keep it simple stupid',in your zeal to make up fantastic and entertaining fabrications
     
  19. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Turned to liquid? Really?

    Can you define exactly what you mean with the term "controlled demolition" please?
     
  20. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As complex and as spectacular as the planning and implementation is said to have been by these twoofers, I would estimate that the attacks were planned probably about the time Osama was born. I mean we have explosives that supposedly withstood the impact of a jumbo jet and a fire whose smoke was seen from space without going off, they were anchored so tightly that they were not thrown clear in the impact, every one of them did their job perfectly and left absolutely no trace of ever having been there.

    And thats just one part of the events.
     
  21. ar10

    ar10 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    To reduce a building to a clean pile, laying in its own footprint, charges are used, that hit apx 50,000 degrees F. Two things happen in this magic moment that clear the way for the fall. In the extreme temperature, the supports at the point of the charge, turn to liquid, and two, the pressure of the blast, blows the liquid away so it can not harden up again, creating a weld point in the blast pocket.

    Controlled Demolition, is just what it sounds like, the towers were brought down, the same way Vegas hotels are brought down when no longer needed.

    If someone fakes having a baby in the Church lobby, at the same time someone is burglarizing the church office, do you blame the baby?

    I think we had planes that day, but the planes were an excuse and a cover for a larger sinister action, that is being covered up.
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    None of which happened on 9/11
     
  23. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The "official" explanations as to why the military failed, why planes couldn't guard anyone until after the fact, the rotating timelines of what happened when are all anything but "simple" explanations. Simple would be providing proof of supposedly buried planes, simple would be proof of a plane hitting the Pentagon, simple would be addressing the mountain of conflicting testimony and evidence.
    No.."simple" is not the "official" way. Show the proof. End of story. Somehow, that just can't be done.
     
  24. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Wow...there ARE smart folks in here on occasion! Why is that so hard for the shills to accept? Oh...pay. I almost forgot. It has to be pay because nobody can be that dense.
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The proof HAS been shown to you,but you refuse to accept it......
     

Share This Page