No Boeing 767 impacted the South Tower on 911

Discussion in '9/11' started by 7forever, Apr 3, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My mind isn't closed,homer,just made up
     
  2. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh please, it's quite closed.
     
  3. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh please,you don't know my mind
     
  4. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    When one defends lies at all costs, and avoids all and any contrary evidence to the lies, one's mind is quite closed.
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have YET to prove any lies told on 9/11...Also you have YET to present any evidence,other than 'it smells fishy'
     
  6. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You refuse to consider anything other than the Kean commission's lies, even when they're presented directly.
     
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have yet to present any, son.
     
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Present some lies first,boss.
     
  9. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Pick any paragraph of the Kean propaganda. You'll find plenty there.
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can't provide evidence, can you?

    Just keep throwing up words to earn your check, Boss.
     
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No,boss YOU present them.
     
  12. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Non sequitur.
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You keep using that word..I do not think it means what you think it means

    boss
     
  14. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The probabilities are against any commercial airliner doing what
    was alleged to have been done on 9/11/2001.

    Can you roll snake-eyes 4 times in a row?

    the alleged airliner hits to the WTC towers were remarkable
    because of several features, one of these features being that
    the wings stayed with the aircraft and penetrated along with
    the body of the aircraft. This is rather special because upon
    contacting the wall, the airliner would have experienced >10 g
    deceleration forces and no airliner is built to stay together given
    that level of stress, why did not only a wing stay with the aircraft,
    but 4 times over, two wings for two aircraft, a most improbable
    event, but it was said to have happened, but can we trust the "news".
    many other aircraft crashes had broken off wings, and note my
    graphic in the OP of "RE: no planes" the most likely thing to happen
    would be for the wings to break off.
     
  15. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    86,074
    Likes Received:
    19,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I can't believe the truthers are still on this kick. They throw a ball against the wall and expect airplanes to react the same. No knowledge of the building, no knowledge of the aircraft, no knowledge of physics but by golly, they sure cannot believe what was filmed, what people saw, what happened basically.
     
  16. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where did you get that? I have never compared the events of 9/11
    to throwing a ball against a wall.... why did you say that?
     
  17. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    86,074
    Likes Received:
    19,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is effectively your argument. You don't understand something so it must not exist.
     
  18. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I understand more than you give credit for, did you see my explanation
    as to why the wings should have broken off "RE: no planes"
     
  19. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    86,074
    Likes Received:
    19,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is apparent you have very little knowledge of aircraft construction or construction of the buildings, or physics for that matter so it is debatable what you 'understand'.
     
  20. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    so let me get this straight,
    an aircraft undergoing >10g deceleration, is expected
    to keep its wings attached and indeed keep its shape
    before being shredded by entry into the WTC tower. (?)
    is that what you believe?
     
  21. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    86,074
    Likes Received:
    19,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
  22. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Quote from the linked document:
    "Since the front of the aircraft decelerates faster than the tail due to impact, "

    OK now, we have a physical object ( the aircraft ) that is alleged to have
    part of it decelerating more than another part, where is the mass breakage
    of the aircraft then?

    Don't just take somebodies word for what is going down,
    look at the physical reality that is being described and
    ask if it aligns with the physical world as you know it.
     
  23. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    86,074
    Likes Received:
    19,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean look at your interpretation of what you think should happen. I don't know if you noticed but the mass breakage happened pretty spectacularly.
     
  24. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    impact.jpg

    any questions?

    (click on the pix to see it better)
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    None at all...You and the no plane crowd failed to make your case.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page