NY proposing bill to require liability insurance for gun ownership.

He supports the Constitution. That tells you everything you need to know.

 

Maybe they people in Prison for promiscuity.
And for eating Biscuity too.
lol

 

You know the answer to this. Why do you keep playing this circular logic game?
We have laws to establish a framework to punish those that break them. No need for redundant laws.

 

Then lets not make redundant laws. I have never supported any

 

You do support redundant laws.
Universal background checks to try to prevent an unlawful acquisition of a firearm, and the fact that unlawful acquisition of a firearm is already illegal is redundancy.

 

The left will do anything to ensure we are professional victims. I think we need liability insurance for free speech.

 

Nope it simply be sure the law is being adhered to. If that were true we would not need background checks for anything. We would just create the law and trust everyone follow it

 

Thats the definition of redundant laws. Your logic is that we need to make a law to make sure the law is being followed. Hence, you support redundant laws.

 

So if we require that pilots have a physical we never need a law to provide documentation of that physical. That would be redundant

 

Any business that posts itself as a gun free zone should have liability insurance to cover victims of violence that were prevented from defending themselves and where they were not defended by the business.

 

Stop dodging. You support redundant gun laws. Quit trying to deny it.

 

So do you which is my point. We require that you pay your taxes. Why do we require a tax return if you are not due money back? Such redundancy.

 

That's one of the dumbest things I've ever read.

I think my IQ dropped 3 points reading that.

 

LOL, that shows a total lack of understanding of the government and how it works.

 

I await your evidence

 

Not to mention the most ridiculous analogy ever created by mankind.

That deserves some kind of award.

 

Crackpot of the year award.

 

This is what happens when you respond to people who have no intention of carrying on a honest conversation.
You may as well play chess with a pigeon.

 

Don't be so hard on yourself.

 

Where did I say I supported this?
You support redundant gun laws.... quit tying to pretend you don't.

 

They are not redundant

 

Venice, Italy.

 

They tried that in the EU and it didn't work. They still have a higher mass shooting rate than we do.

 

I'm not comparing the UK to the US because of demographs and the definitions of crimes. I'm comparing the UK before and after the ban. First of all correlation does not equal causation. Secondly it wasn't always difficult to buy weapons. Thirdly it's not that difficult to get weapons anyway. You can buy deactivated replicas just as, if not more easily than buying a functional gun here in the US. All you have to do is buy a milling machine and have a bit of know how on what to do. And finally if it was so hard to buy guns before the ban which you say is the reason for the low murder rate then why did they needed a new law being even more restrictive?

 

A law made when there is already a law in place is redundant.
Just admit you support redundant gun laws. We already know it, just man up.