Only 2.27% of the population can prevent a constitutional amendment that's a problem.

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Sackeshi, Nov 21, 2019.

  1. Sackeshi

    Sackeshi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,943
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    What? I'm talking about the equal rights amendment. Has nothing to do with telling people they can't due things.
     
  2. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    17,600
    Likes Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So the amendment should say: "Anyone can do what they will, as long as they don't violate the body or property of their fellow man." I could get behind such an amendment.
     
  3. Sackeshi

    Sackeshi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,943
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    The a amendment simply states.
    Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.

    What is wrong with this?
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2019
  4. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    33,828
    Likes Received:
    10,603
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Amend the constitution.
     
    Longshot likes this.
  5. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    33,828
    Likes Received:
    10,603
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Intimidation. Mob rule.
    You make the fascsts proud.
     
    Longshot likes this.
  6. william kurps

    william kurps Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2019
    Messages:
    5,041
    Likes Received:
    1,866
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its funny I have been mentioning it, I guess MSNBC or fox hasn't been posting it, just me I had a feeling
     
  7. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    17,600
    Likes Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    More than a feeling:
     
  8. Tim15856

    Tim15856 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2016
    Messages:
    7,407
    Likes Received:
    3,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    We already have that, why do we need the ERA?
     
  9. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    17,600
    Likes Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What's wrong with it is that no person should be able to violate the body or property of his neighbor. The writ you cite claims to permit this.
     
  10. Sackeshi

    Sackeshi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,943
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    No we don't we have gender specific laws. We need it to remove all gender specification from the legal system and legislation of the united states
     
  11. Sackeshi

    Sackeshi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,943
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    what the **** are you talking about?
     
  12. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    17,600
    Likes Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Was I not clear? I said that no person should have the right to initiate a violation of the body or property of his neighbor. If we agree upon this principle then we have no beef.
     
  13. Sackeshi

    Sackeshi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,943
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    You have not explained how said amendment being ratified would change that.
     
  14. Tim15856

    Tim15856 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2016
    Messages:
    7,407
    Likes Received:
    3,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    For example? Or does this have something to do with trans rights?
     
  15. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    17,600
    Likes Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It would allow one person to impose their will on their fellow man, no?
     
  16. Sackeshi

    Sackeshi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,943
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    1. Gender specific spaces
    2. Gender specific jobs
    3. Custody/Parent rights
    4. Reproductive inequality.
     
  17. Sackeshi

    Sackeshi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,943
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Um no, it would make men and women equal under the law. Like either you can tell me specifics or you have no argument.
     
  18. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    17,600
    Likes Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender? WTF is that?
     
  19. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    17,600
    Likes Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When you say "law", are you referring to edicts written by a small cadre of people?
     
  20. Sackeshi

    Sackeshi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,943
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    The two groups of human based on whether one has a penis or a vagina. Any more questions?
     
  21. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    17,600
    Likes Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So all those with penises you call males and all those with vaginas you call females? Is that your rubric?
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2019
  22. Sackeshi

    Sackeshi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,943
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't know why you are being nitpicky and yes that is what they are called.

    Is this the stupid "AbOrTiOn WiLl Be EnShRiNeD InTo ThE CoNsTiTuTiOn If ThE eRa Is PaSsEd"?

    Because you really have failed to give any such evidence or context as to how those words on the amendment in any way violate personal or property rights.
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2019
  23. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    17,600
    Likes Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So everyone with a penis is a male? And everyone with a vagina is a female?
     
  24. Tim15856

    Tim15856 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2016
    Messages:
    7,407
    Likes Received:
    3,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    1-so no men's or women's bathroom.
    2- No woman only dancers
    3- agree there
    4- no such thing. The unborn should have rights too.
     
  25. Sackeshi

    Sackeshi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,943
    Likes Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Sigh as I see you are next going to say some **** about how its transphobic to hold such a view I will post this before you get a chance

    Born with Penis=Male Born with Vagina=Female
    Male=/=Man Female=/=Woman
    A man is someone who identifies as male and a woman is someone who identifies as female
     

Share This Page