I have nothing against the police, intelligence services or military there is no reason to worry if you obey the law and do what they tell you when they ordered to. He should not have been at a wild party and where they were tossing bottles at and resisting police if you make bad choices you pay the price sometimes.
We need police forces as we do with Federal agencies. But such authority brings with it responsibility. Police need to be constrained by the law as is any part of government. All these cases of police brutality have cost taxpayers multiple millions of dollars in jury awards. It's time to stop police brutality and abusive government intrusionism.
I'm with you. The Tea Partiers, however, tend to be in favor of prohibition, so long as that doesn't involve prohibiting white people from owning guns, as well as all sorts of legislation which criminalizes behaviors. So, despite any outcry they may have over police conduct, their advocacy of more government rules indicates a desire for more policing. With that will come corruption and abusive government. You can't constrain police by law and have them get done what needs to be done to prevent people from doing whatever it is the government believes that they shouldn't do.
Officer in fatal NY arrest stripped of gun, badge Source: Associated Press Officer in fatal NY arrest stripped of gun, badge By VERENA DOBNIK and JAKE PEARSON | July 19, 2014 NEW YORK (AP) — A New York City police officer involved in the arrest of a man who died in custody after being placed in an apparent chokehold has been stripped of his gun and badge and placed on desk duty, police said Saturday. Officer Daniel Pantaleo, an eight-year NYPD veteran, and an officer who has been with the force for four years were both taken off the street after the death Thursday of 43-year-old Eric Garner on Staten Island, police said. The department would not identify the second officer but said he would retain his gun and badge while on desk duty. The reassignment is effective immediately and will remain in effect while Garner's death is being investigated, police said. Partial video of the encounter obtained by the New York Daily News shows the 6-foot-3, 350-pound Garner becoming irate and refusing to be handcuffed as officers tried to arrest him on suspicion of selling untaxed, loose cigarettes on a sidewalk. http://www.chron.com/news/crime/art...after-in-custody-death-of-NYC-man-5632335.php Video is available on youtube - very scary how these criminal police attack and murder innocent people. >>>MOD EDIT Off Topic Removed<<<
Our Second Amendment specifically and unambiguously enumerates what is necessary to the security of a free State. Why are gun lovers so cognitively dissonant?
It is only due to your limited vocabularies. It really is that simple to avoid resorting to diversion.
nope...go look it up. There are no such words, used jointly as "cognitively dissonant" you are in error, again..............Try to run this out again, and I shall report you for trolling and flamebating
People need to exercise their 2d Amendment rights to protect themselves from criminal cops. This will save taxpayers MILLIONS of dollars in lawsuits arising from police criminal actions. That incident above where the cop chokes an innocent man to death would never have happened to a member of the armed Black Panthers in Houston. Therefore, NYC's laws which prohibit carrying guns needs to be changed and people need to carry guns to save them from criminal cops. Let's have forum right wingers agree.
There are no such words, used jointly as "cognitively dissonant" in the DSM5 you are still in error you are merely hodge-podging words that don't go together................
nope, again, there are no words used jointly in the DSM5. Try again. it is simple for one to act like a 9 year old when caught lying.
no it doesn't. only the precursor word changes the tense...basic English as in: You suffer from cognitive dissonance You have suffered from cognitive dissonance. You will suffer from cognitive dissonance. all are the prefect tense. you have no grasp on basic English as you have demonstrated time and time again. you just like to rewrite the rules of grammar to appease yourself and self-importance
ad hom, fails to meet the criteria for an intelligent response pseudo-intellectual debate...you are disarmed
and I supplied you with perfect tense for past, present and future....what's your issue? That I won't allow you to rewrite the rules of grammar...
special pleading is just that. why have gerunds if not for Changes in words due to tense? In any case, here is an example: cognitive-ly. It really is that simple.
1. One who attempts to flex intellect that does not exist within his or her own mind. 2. Can probably be found with a thesaurus in hand, while in a chat room, looking up new insults that are synonymous with "stupid" in order to boost his or her own undeserved ego. 3. Typical cases of pseudo-intellectualism involve pre-pubescent 15 year olds that think they have everything figured out, including, but not limited to: life, religion, politics, education, and sex. Ironically, they have never quite experienced either of the aforementioned. 4. Pretends he or she has an opinion. http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...o-intellectual
Nothing but diversion? I thought you had a point to make not merely quibble over easily understandable semantics.
Why are State governors getting a free pass as Commanders in Chief regarding that which is necessary to the security of a free State?
