President Obama and all of the Progressive Democrats are Communist

Oh, so when the white man took away the indians land and then redistrubuted it.......via a big government.........that was OK and perfectly right thing to do huh? Well, so said the white man who benefited from such theft.

But once the white man has taken just about everything, they suddenly have a problem with another race coming behind them and doing the exact same they did. Suddenly they are crying foul and letting us know how wrong it was...................but yet they don't want to give their stolen land back. Amazing, huh?

 

I follow numerous news sources including CNN and MSNBC, in both cases the bias is quite difficult to listen to. Obama surrounds himself with very radical people from the likes of the Occupy movement and we all, I hope can agree have socialist leanings just like his slut hippy mother that woke him up and spoon fed him Marxism every morning as a child.

American Indians were displaced by order of the King of England and other nations which first exploited America. Following the Revolutionary War and western expansion there were wars between America and Indian nations and Mexico to establish our borders. In the case of our southern border America lost over 50,000 soldiers and fought to Mexico City...guess they could have taken Mexico too if they wanted to? In the case of Spanish land owners in the conquered territory, land rights were preserved...in the case of Indians they were given reservations...yes Indians weren't treated fairly by Jackson...maybe you should complain to the Democrats when they have their Jefferson - Jackson celebrations? Correct me if I'm wrong but that's about the standard for establishing borders in any state in the world?

What is your point about the white man and "another race" coming behind them and doing the exact same they did? What are you talking about, what other race is now taking the white mans stuff? We live in America and have equal property rights regardless of race?

 

I'm still waiting for you to support this statment or concede.........

 

there is a law called FERPA, which makes educational records private. Anyone who releases such information is subject to criminal prosecution. So all the claims about him being on some sort of scholarship for foreign students is baseless unless those making the claim can produce documentation, and if they do provide it, they and the person they received it from are libel to criminal prosecution.

 

If that's true, that also means that Obama wouldn't have to spend anything on sealing the records, since the law apparently does that by default.

 

Regardless of his past his record speaks for itself. Obama surrounds himself with commies
http://commieblaster.com/socialist_czars/index.html

 

That's it? Perhaps your experiences during this war have unhinged you a little...

 

so you admit you made it up that he spent millions "sealing" his records then?

and why can't you seem to define communism, and provide specific policy examples making him one?

 

Look, obama has policies that resemble progressivism, leftism, marxism, communism and socialism. There is very little difference between them all. Instead of coming on here and insulting everyone with your foolish attempts to skew the commie ideals of obama, I suggest you read the entire link I've so generously left here for you. After reading said link, I'll challenge you to tell us what part of obama's commie-ism, socilaism, marxism and progressivism do you have a problem labeling him with.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterfe...-really-a-socialist-lets-analyze-obamanomics/

 

Exactly.

 

So you can't define it or provide specific policy examples either?

it's ok. we both know none of you guys throwing out the terms communism/socialism/marxism have the slightest clue what they mean.

 

Whatever would ever cause you to think such a thing? The revealing fact of my statement is my age and your and others age who fail to see the relationship between the progressives and communism. Just investigate what their agenda and you'll see it mirrors socialism, the stepping stone to communism. Here's a link to Wiki where the progressives outline their agenda. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus#Ideology

 

Obama is such a socialist that the business world has funded his campaign more than they have the Republicans for the last two elections. Silly boys. Don't they know Obama wants to give all their money away to homosexuals, illegals and slackers?

 

Utter rubbish. Socialism a stepping stone to communism? A link between progressive and communist?

Here's a question... what exactly is "a progressive"?

 

Baloney. Less than 20% of the housing bubble was caused by Fannie & Freddie. The rest was caused by uber-aggressive private bank lending policies. Neither had anything to do with the destruction of private property ownership because, well, private property ownership is alive and well.

 

Hi everyone, I'm back and I'm a communist now. And Obama is definitely NOT a Communist by any stretch of the imagination. If he were, that would mean he would be planning a revolutionary overthrow of...himself? and his wall street/corporate donors? Uhh no.

 

Actually, pure socialism is the route by which most states striving for a communist state have gone. No state or country has reached the point of a communist state yet.

 

Nor a fully capitalist state I'd guess and certainly not the US. Most economies are mixed, which is a problem for most right wingers to understand.

 

No, the USA is not a purely capitalist state. Somalia is apparently the only purely free market capitalist state apparently. Although, I haven't really looked into it beyond hearing it thrown out as a fun fact once in a while.

 

A free market is a great concept but is not in the interests of the capitalists once they have achieved any degree of success. Once they’re established it is in their interests to eliminate competition, get some kind of guarantees of future success. Price supports, tariffs, monopolies, and tax breaks are all examples of ways that capitalists seek to limit the freedoms of the market.
As I see it the role of government is to fight these tendencies and keep the market as free as possible.

 

Something we should aspire to *rolls eyes*.

 

I posted this earlier, now pay attention

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

Are you slow or just plain stupid, the post you quoted has a link answering your question? But I'll post it again for your ease of reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus#Ideology

I see socialism as a thief of freedom through government control which continues to steal freedoms the longer it's practiced. It does it in law and changes in social norms. Here's an example:When I was growing up there was no Medicare or Medicaid and everyone was able to go to the hospital for treatment with little problem. In the case of the very poor hospitals often forgave much, if not all of the costs. Smokers were everywhere and smoking was very popular and trendy more so than tattoos are in today's culture...people actually used to apologize for not smoking making excuses such as, I have asthma or I tried it and couldn't get past the nausea it caused. Every home in America had ash trays even if the homeowners were non smokers, imagine that? We know how smoking is thought of today and the hundreds of laws and taxation associated with this legal practice today. Most young people don't even have a clue that the way they think and the way the laws and taxes are imposed are resultant of the social programs of Medicare and Medicaid.

All socialist actions are with the best intentions at heart, whether it's the First Lady's lunches for children or the Mayor of NY City fretting about size of soft drinks...but every action has a reaction and time doesn't stand still...time progresses into the future and the new kids are born into a new norm and accept the new environment. OK I used the example of smoking but what about a socialist that worries about the middle class who is willing to make laws to protect their quality of life? Perhaps a law that all nonessential services must close at five thirty PM M-F and work restrictions of 8-12 noon on Saturday...that's to say all the malls, groceries stores and dry cleaners must close in order the workers quality of life be maintained...well, you say oh that's just a silly argument, a strawman...well it isn't because when stationed in German in 1982 that was the law and choices had to be made whether to buy that toilet paper you needed or pick up the dry cleaning if you got off at 5PM from work.

Progressive always has unintended consequences which always results in loss of freedom and seldom makes any change for the better.

 

You can see it as you like, it does not make it so.

You're idiotic OP meant I do not read your posts... as they simply contain the same simple minded (*)(*)(*)(*)e.

 

I apologize for being rude. Please forgive me!