Pro choice people eventually become pro life

YA That is where you said it you acted like you need proof that you said it and there it was



""""At some point during pregnancy it's not your body, it's another human being

Josephwalker, Today at 12:03 PM



Now that you ducked and weaved with that little "prove I said it" crap care to address the CONTENTS of the post of mine you quoted twice or DO YOU NOT HAVE ANY ANSWERS LONGER THAN A BUMPER STICKER ?????

FoxHastings said: ↑
OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that

Sarcasm alert for righties....How DARE that woman IMPRISON another PERSON in her body!! That's KIDNAPPING! False imprisonment!! How dare she take away that "person's" right to move freely through society!!!


If , as YOU said, it isn't hers then why TF should she have to take care of it?

Answer the question if you are so sure it isn't hers:

OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that

 

That's just a C&P of the post quoted....I like to include it so there 's a connection/continuation of the discussion......and to remind duckers who duck from questions that they haven't addressed my posts

 

Why are you repeating your ...whatever...over and over ???

 

Medical terms are fine for medicine but at some point a zygote is a baby and must be treated as such. Whether that's seconds before birth or months before birth it's a baby.

 

Sorry but I can't respond to these page long psychotic rants. Calm down, take deep breaths and try to remain coherent. I'll respond to your first comment. Yes you misquoted me and I corrected that.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
YA That is where you said it you acted like you need proof that you said it and there it was



""""At some point during pregnancy it's not your body, it's another human being

Josephwalker, Today at 12:03 PM



Now that you ducked and weaved with that little "prove I said it" crap care to address the CONTENTS of the post of mine you quoted twice or DO YOU NOT HAVE ANY ANSWERS LONGER THAN A BUMPER STICKER ?????

FoxHastings said: ↑
OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that

Sarcasm alert for righties....How DARE that woman IMPRISON another PERSON in her body!! That's KIDNAPPING! False imprisonment!! How dare she take away that "person's" right to move freely through society!!!


If , as YOU said, it isn't hers then why TF should she have to take care of it?

Answer the question if you are so sure it isn't hers:

OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that

Excuse No. 12 for not answering those inconvenient questions

My post was not a page long....but it was longer than a bumper sticker

How about one question at a time so it won't be so frightening:

""OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life ?, NO one else has to do that

 

According to me at some point it's a separate living human being and the woman has no more right to kill it in the womb than she does once it's outside the womb. I realize you feel different and according to you she could kill it seconds before birth but you are in a very small minority which is the premise of this thread. I won't try to change your mind either, you have a right to believe what you want but fortunately your views do not represent society at large and to that I say WHEW! Thank God!

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
YA That is where you said it you acted like you need proof that you said it and there it was



""""At some point during pregnancy it's not your body, it's another human being

Josephwalker, Today at 12:03 PM



Now that you ducked and weaved with that little "prove I said it" crap care to address the CONTENTS of the post of mine you quoted twice or DO YOU NOT HAVE ANY ANSWERS LONGER THAN A BUMPER STICKER ?????

FoxHastings said: ↑
OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that

Sarcasm alert for righties....How DARE that woman IMPRISON another PERSON in her body!! That's KIDNAPPING! False imprisonment!! How dare she take away that "person's" right to move freely through society!!!


If , as YOU said, it isn't hers then why TF should she have to take care of it?

Answer the question if you are so sure it isn't hers:

OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that







Excuse No. 12 for not answering those inconvenient questions

My post was not a page long....but it was longer than a bumper sticker

How about one question at a time so it won't be so frightening:

""OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life ?, NO one else has to do that

Views are weak when questions about them are ducked and avoided...

 

Very simple. When jumping into a conversation between others quote who I'm supposed to have responded to. It's difficult when I have multiple conversations going to know which conversation you are jumping in.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that

Sarcasm alert for righties....How DARE that woman IMPRISON another PERSON in her body!! That's KIDNAPPING! False imprisonment!! How dare she take away that "person's" right to move freely through society!!!


If , as YOU said, it isn't hers then why TF should she have to take care of it?

Answer the question if you are so sure it isn't hers:

OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that







Excuse No. 12 for not answering those inconvenient questions

My post was not a page long....but it was longer than a bumper sticker

How about one question at a time so it won't be so frightening:

""OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life ?, NO one else has to do that

The only unfathomable rant I saw was the OP.

BTW, I like it when my posts stand out...it highlights how some people can't address those inconvenient questions and facts

 

Very true so quit ducking the question. Why is it okay to kill a baby seconds before birth but it's murder seconds after birth?

 

At least you admit they stand out. Earlier you said

You can't even remember what you say can you. LOL

 

Now that you ducked and weaved with that little "prove I said it" crap care to address the CONTENTS of the post of mine you quoted twice or DO YOU NOT HAVE ANY ANSWERS LONGER THAN A BUMPER STICKER ?????

FoxHastings said: ↑
OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that

Sarcasm alert for righties....How DARE that woman IMPRISON another PERSON in her body!! That's KIDNAPPING! False imprisonment!! How dare she take away that "person's" right to move freely through society!!!


If , as YOU said, it isn't hers then why TF should she have to take care of it?

Answer the question if you are so sure it isn't hers:

OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that







Excuse No. 12 for not answering those inconvenient questions

My post was not a page long....but it was longer than a bumper sticker

How about one question at a time so it won't be so frightening:

""OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life ?, NO one else has to do that

OMG! You finally made a point! Meaningless and off topic but a point...kudos to you..


more kudos if you can face my post

 

A couple of things you are overlooking... they are not 'imprisoned' they are free to leave and return to their home country at any time. If the 'world's greatest country' ain't so great, why do they want to stay? Do not tell me they had no idea what might happen by separation of adults from children, they knew and were willing to take the risk.

Technically, immigrants seeking asylum are supposed to take first offered, it is not a 'shop for the best'. They didn't. The US is still accepting their applications, big nasty entity that it is. Those that broke the law by crossing illegally, then applying for asylum broke the law. Should they be treated the same as those who followed protocol? No. Yet they are being treated humanely. I wonder how many countries that they could do the same, and remain alive.

What the priests did, and what the higher ups covered up is disgusting. There is no difference between them and the scum from the street who molest children.

While I am pro-choice, that does not mean I am pro-abortion, though my personal standing has nothing to do with this, even though you are trying to make it so on multiple levels.

Exactly what do you expect to happen when thousands of people demand entry to a country? Open the door, hey, have a good time, no background checks necessary, no review of your standing as a candidate as a good, decent law abiding citizen? Perhaps you, in your ivory tower, feel they should be let into the country with no vetting, and be advised 'we'll be in touch'.

No, I don't automatically assume children will be molested unless particular conditions are shown to exist. How you must fear for the day your child, or anyone's child, walk's out the door to play in the yard. God forbid they ride their bike down the street. You do realize that treating every other person as a potential molester, and then permitting thousands of unknown people into the country is a whopping contradiction of perspectives, right?

 

For a while you did okay in this thread but as you were cornered and beaten you retreated behind your usually one flew over the cuckoo's nest multicolored in bold page long indecipherable psychotic breakdown post. I'll not let you drag me down the rabbit hole with you. Have a nice day and you are back on ignore.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Now that you ducked and weaved with that little "prove I said it" crap care to address the CONTENTS of the post of mine you quoted twice or DO YOU NOT HAVE ANY ANSWERS LONGER THAN A BUMPER STICKER ?????

FoxHastings said: ↑
OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that

Sarcasm alert for righties....How DARE that woman IMPRISON another PERSON in her body!! That's KIDNAPPING! False imprisonment!! How dare she take away that "person's" right to move freely through society!!!


If , as YOU said, it isn't hers then why TF should she have to take care of it?

Answer the question if you are so sure it isn't hers:

OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life, NO one else has to do that







Excuse No. 12 for not answering those inconvenient questions

My post was not a page long....but it was longer than a bumper sticker

How about one question at a time so it won't be so frightening:

""OK, then women have all the more right to have it taken out! Afterall, according to you, it isn't HERS Why TF should she sustain someone else's life ?, NO one else has to do that





OMG! You finally made a point! Meaningless and off topic but a point...kudos to you..


more kudos if you can face my post

And kudos to me for once more defeating the Anti-Choice side …. as you were cornered and beaten you retreated I didn't.

 

Let me see if I can parallel this.... sometime between birth and death, a person may choose not to abort, which according to you, makes them pro-life.… which means all pro-choice individuals are pro-life. I'm having a hard time keeping a straight face through that.

Perhaps you need a definition of what a Pro-choice individual is. It's some who believes that they have no right to make a choice for another person. I can not like something, I can not choose it for myself, but pro-choice means I do not and will not make that choice for another person.

Legality is a whole 'nuther discussion, but in a nutshell, you are wrong.

 

It does make for harder reading since it's hard to tell where your quote of yourself ends. You do know you can flag other posts to be included when you hit quote, yes?

 

Since that moment is in contention, yet fetus is applicable until the time of birth, then the use of ZEF to refer to the entirety of gestation is a useful unambiguous term.

 

My quote of myself(on a white background) is above the green tinted quote of the other poster.

Now if you have an On Topic comment I'll be waiting....

 

You are incorrect. I never claimed that. You did, however, assert that my position was hypocritical. How so?

 

You claimed that you supported the State making one person for consequences of the actions of another with respect to an unintended pregnancy.

That you want this to apply to one gender and not to the other is hypocrisy.

 

Women are

Note...no mention of child

 

Then I wonder why there are so many more women at pro choice rallies. But thanks for manspaining

 

No reasonable person could extract that from my post. Here is my position again so that it will appear when you reply:

I believe abortion is wrong. I do not believe that my opinion should be forced on others. Please show how you were able to extract hypocrisy from that statement.