Race and Crime

The idea of yours that it's not "scientific" when Stanford does research about systemic racism, and not about racism... is of course absurd.

 

I put up 6 sources proving systemic racism is true, among things that black people are tossed in jail 6 times more often on drug related crimes while white people commit more drug related crimes..... and so proving the data of the police/US government who gets arrested over what means absolutely nothing in who commits the most crimes. And all you can do is make that comment, not debunking a thing.

 

So Stanford only does science?

 

No, it's a FACT! Nowhere in the study do they claim to know about all of the drug crime!

 

Whoa, Kemosabe, that was in reference to our two friends Senors Buri and Conservative Democrat as examples. One believes the answer to the African American "problem" is culture, the other genetics. A simple explanation requires no deep thought or further information.

 

Systemic racism has become the fashionable alibi to explain black failure when there is no evidence of racial discrimination.

 

Everywhere in the world, and always throughout history, blacks have been characterized by low average intelligence and high rates of crime and illegitimacy. They have never produced an advanced civilization on their own. Nowhere is there a black run country with a high standard of living, a low crime rate, and a well functioning government. I think that is solid evidence that black problems are genetic, and not the fault of white racism.

 

Yes, monocausotaxophilia.

 

Why does this matter though?

 

When a white person refuses to employ a black person for being black, without saying it... it means that there is no evidence of racial discrimination
Yet systemic racism is proven to be true. I sourced that with 6 different high end sources. Let's be clear about that.

 

Or perhaps there wasn't any great black applicants?..

 

My reply was specifically about when racism plays a roll, but there was no evidence.

 

Denial is not a healthy response to reality or is it just ignorance?
Companies are more than twice as likely to call minority applicants for interviews if they submit whitened resumes than candidates who reveal their race—and this discriminatory practice is just as strong for businesses that claim to value diversity as those that don’t.

 

Blacks make up less than 20 percent of the population and of that and unfortunately a great chunk of that 20 percent are not graduating college. Are you under the false assumption that there is this large swath of educated or trained/hireable blacks that are flooding job postings with applications? For every job posting I would say a very VERY small percentage is black.

That's the problem.

But if I'm a business owner, and you, the applicant, bring skills and abilities that will help my business succeed...I don't give a flying **** about your race/religion/sexual identity or any of that. I want to make money. Hiring you will help me make money. It's that simple.

 

The National Crime Victimization Survey confirms the statistics on blacks and violent crime. Whether you use police records or surveys of the victims

 

The assumption is you are not (or no longer) ignorant therefore you are in denial of reality and have made an alternate reality you are comfortable in.

 

Please comment on my previous post that who does a crime =/= who gets convicted. I proved that, and it's due to systemic racism.

 

You had months of time to come up with a source to debunk the research of Stanford, and you produced nothing.
I'm absolutely not interested in your silly personal opinion about it, but it's a FACT that it's the only thing you got.

My sources stand that I proved systemic racism is real.

 

It's NOT an opinion, it's a FACT! Nowhere in the study do they claim to know about all of the drug crime!

 

You're not proving your facts when they post how much people do drug crime / not quoting the research in any kind of way, while you're not producing any sources to counter the research. All you're been doing is attempting to debunk my academic research with your opinion... all along.

 

Which is NOT the same as claiming to know about all of the drug crime! And you said that MAYBE I'M correct!

 

You can only be correct when you prove your point. And you have not.
And since you have not, it does mean my sources stand and systemic racism is true.
And it remains so, until you source and quote where my sources are wrong.

Since you've been at it for months on end, but couldn't source crap all...
It's safe to say you failed to debunk my sources.


I'll be not responding to you again unless you link a source and quote where my sources are wrong.

 

I didn't SAY that your sources are wrong. Your sources are just not concluding what you THINK they are concluding!

 

When my sources say that white people do the same to even slightly more drug related crime, then it is so... until you prove something else.
And so it remains that there is a fast discrepancy between who does the crime and who gets arrested/convicted, and the conclusion is systemic racism.
That is their conclusion.

The end.

 

Your sources don't say that.