You mean someone who defends the human rights of a people who have been living there for 5,000 years or more as confirmed by genetics. Defend a people whose genetics suggest have the closest link to the ancient Jews against fanatical religious people who have no understanding of the value of human life and human dignity. I have already explained to you Rev, that the West Bank which is part of the Palestinian State the UN perceived, as well as having people who were expelled from what became Israel, was on an agreement between Israel, Britain and Jordon, taken over by the Jordanians in 48. The only people who recognised this annexation was Britain. The reason for the annexation was in order that Jordon, who had the one army capable of causing Israel problems would agree not to and in order that the Palestinians would not have their ability to form their own state. OMG, how about the truth. Onward Christian soldiers. There is no absolution for people who murder and kill and throw people off their lands just because they have managed to get their religious book to say it so that they can cause Armageddon. To be frank, the Islamic version sounds more credible - quite rightly it talks of a Christian people with none of the signs of Christianity. None of the compassion and goodness which was the basis of Christianity. Rather a Christianity born of political will to serve Political masters, not spirituality. Where is your compassion for even the Palestinian Christians. You have none.
A couple of things here: If you have to "dig long and hard" to know of the existence of the LRA then you should take another glance at international politics; but number two: I have been following the NLFT for years; I'm not merely referring to one incident that you googled. They have had ministers arrested with explosives in their vehicles, and they have engaged in acts of human trafficking for the sake of producing pornography to sell for funding. What's more, they are a largely Christian demographic and they absolutely are a rebel movement that has risen up against India. I could do the same by pointing to the Nagaland Rebels. To be honest, one doesn't have to look long and hard for Christians engaging in acts of violence within modern history (or even to this day). Witch hunts are fairly large problems for example in places such as Nigeria, and Papua New Guinea; Charles Taylor, the war criminal best known for his roles in the Sierra Leone Diamond wars and in the Liberian Civil War was himself a Deacon in a Baptist Church. The M23 Rebels in eastern Kivu is run by a man who called his troops "soldiers of God"; Jumping back a few years to South Africa: while the church eventually was very anti-segregation, the apartheid movement was also initially put forward for legal consideration by the church. (I think we forget that the white Supremest states in Africa were Christian states) I also think that we tend to forget that much of Sub-Saharan Africa is quite Christian. One need not look very hard to find examples of violence engaged in by Christian populations. And I'm not just talking about shooting each other, i'm talking about the worst forms of violence; from eating unborn babies out of their mothers' wombs, to setting schools on fire and then abducting anyone who runs out, to mass rape, ethnic cleansing, genocide, widespread use of child soldiers, etc. Now, personally, I don't blame Christianity for these things any more than I blame Islam as an institution for things like 9/11. That's not my intent. My intent was merely to show him how silly he was being by turning the tables on him. Of course he doesn't support the NLFT, he probably has never even heard of them; that's the point. Despite the fact that he lives in a country with some of the best communication infrastructure available the only incident of Christians engaging in unsavory violence that he could think of was the IRA; and yet he seems to expect all Muslims, with a vast majority of them living in developing countries, to be perfectly informed on things such as violent conflict. - - - Updated - - - The use of nuclear weapons during the Second World War had nothing to do with religion.
The bible says that knowledge of Jesus will cover the earth as water covers the ocean. And that all shall kneel and all heads shall bow down in recognition of him. That's sort of one of the side effects associated with believing in an all powerful godhead with a singular universally applicable message.
I find it amusing that people like you always have to resort to posting pictures of the SAME protest that took place in the UK. What's wrong? Not enough of them going on to add some diversity to your hate speech? I mean, that thing happened years ago.
Onward, christian soldiers. [/QUOTE] Ignorance is bliss? I will teach those that insist in using deception and/or lies to make a point. (Its an if the shoe fits thing). First the USA is SECULAR nation that protects all religions unlike some of rIslamic's that tortures rapes and beheads many of those hapless souls that do not convert to Islam. The USAs population is mostly Christian but we are not allowed to have atomic bombs. If we were Iran might not exist right now the way I feel…IF I WERE NOT CHRISTIAN. #2 the picture you presented was of fatman a bomb that ended a WORLD WAR. Different thing than a bunch of IslamoNuts crashing jets into the world trade center killing more non combatants in peacetime that the was killed at pearl harbor. reva
Did I miss something somewhere? I didn't know the WBC was a terrorist group that actively killed people everyday and made threats to groups all over television and the internet. Then again, we have no cable in Montana, so it might have changed recently
Ignorance is bliss? I will teach those that insist in using deception and/or lies to make a point by the followiing FACTS (Its an if the shoe fits thing , and the iggy shoe fits ALL the usual suspects) ; First the USA is SECULAR nation that protects all religions unlike some of rIslamic nations and people. Also rIslam adhearents that pratice sharia law etc will behead many of those hapless souls that do not convert to Islam, or those that they deem worthy of death for what would not be a serious crime (to say the least in America). #2.... The USAs population is mostly Christian but we are not allowed to have atomic bombs. If we were Iran might not exist right now the way I feel…IF I WERE NOT CHRISTIAN, lol. #2b the picture you presented was of fatman an A bomb that ended a WORLD WAR. That is a different thing than a bunch of IslamoNuts crashing jets into the world trade center killing non combatants in peacetime. In fact those pervs killed many of their own as well as thousands more. More people were murdered in the world trade center attack than was was killed at pearl harbor. reva
How many thousand similar pictures from different protests all over the world do you want me to post?
The difference of course is that the Christians tried to enforce their beliefs and make sure Christianity dominates the world a millenium ago, during the dark ages. The dark ages of Islam are today and the picture merely confirms the willingness of muslims fundamentalists to shove Islam down our throats. "Islam will dominate the world" as the sign says is a threat, not a prediction.
Al-Qaeda practices ideologized religion. Ideologies can be dangerous if they get out of hand and so can religions; the idea of a combination of the two bent on hate and murder makes it a no brainer to oppose the Islamo-fascists.
How about its manufacture and development ? Half of the Manhattan Project senior team was jewish; Otto Frisch Robert Oppenheimer (Lead Scientist) Felix Bloch David Bohm Eugene (Paul) Wigner Rudolph Peierls Leo Szilard What religion was the other half ? Muslim ?
404 your pictures not found. - - - Updated - - - The dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan had nothing to do with religion. The people who built it weren't the ones who used it.
10-20% who do constitute hundreds of millions. And the rest who don't support such violence do not do sh*t to clean up their muslim house, in fact they typically act like apologists who go like "terror is wrong but it's America's/Israel's/the West's fault that there are muslim terrorists".
Aww, look, now he's simply pulling numbers out of his ass. How cute. What are you doing to oust the current Kazakhstan president who came to power through non-transparent "elections"? Why are you on here instead of out in the streets cleaning up your own house?
Your posts indicate a liking of Islam and Islamization. Are you a Muslim ? And do you deny that al Qaeda's genocidal program is straight out of the Koran ? - - - Updated - - - OFF TOPIC.
Good post. And he can also name all the soldiers in a military base who Westboro Baptist have shot and killed and wounded. And how many they have attempted to plant bombs on.
Of course not, Fat Man and Little Boy were merely intended as curious book-ends . I'll ask you again- Half of the Manhattan Project team was jewish. What religion was the other half ?
It is not a fallacy that Muslims assign terrorist ideology to themselves, by their acceptance of the Koran.
You're engaging in a hyperbole fallacy here. They were weapons, we were engaged in a war that had nothing to do with religion, we used the weapons that we developed. Not sure how you can twist that into an evil conspiracy involving the Jews trying to wipe out Japan. That literally sounds crazy. Jewish is an ethnicity, it doesn't mean that they were practicing, and you have yet to show how this makes any sort of difference? Did you know that Germany was Christian? OMG and did you know that the Nazis engaged in the Holocaust?! Clearly all Christians hate all Jews. We just support Israel as part of an elaborate conspircacy to one day crush them!!!! Seriously, seek help.
Everything that you've written here directly contadicts the thread's attack upon Islam. No Islamic nuclear bombs, no Islamic world wars. Judeo-christian pork-ups are not the fault of muslims. Dead thread.