Russian & France Civilian murders

Okay, I accept that, and that it looks like a bomb strike (I hadn't watched it until now). On the other hand why the uncertainty in the newspaper article? And at that distance who can say a bakery was hit. Two or three things aren't adding up.

 

Nato hit news channel building, Hospital, Bridges, telecommunication, Chemical factories, cigarette factories in Serbia.
No one raised an eyebrow.
Why should we now?

 

Shoting Hospital is a war crime. Massacring Bosnians is another war crime.

 

There are also close footeges of it. You can say both is not the same places but different locations. What should it be other than a bakery ? for example ?

 

Nato did not hit news channel building, Hospital, Bridges, telecommunication, Chemical factories, cigarette factories in Serbia while Milosevic was committing ethnic cleansing and genocide against Bosnians. When Milosevic was done with the product of his sick mind, Nato decided to deliver few bombs after Turks lobbied for months. That's what's up with NATO...

 

How much your new motherland pays you for this bull(*)(*)(*)(*)? "Russia is believed" ! This Istanbul-based Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH) has to be checked if they tell the truth, and if it is indeed bakery and not a house full of weapons.

 

You mean the motherland they had to move in after Russians kicked them all out?

 

Yes, I mean the motherland which they moved in. This is disgusting to pour out (*)(*)(*)(*) on the country, where one was born and got free education.

 

Ok, they bombed them selfs.
Strange Milosevic didnt get convicted for any crime at all, all these years in prison.
And there is no such things as "Bosnians" there are Bosniaks, Serbs, Croats in that made up state aka mini yugoslavia called bosnia.
But that is not the topic.

What is the difference here? To me superpowers do what they want without any punishment.

And I'm not worried with you Turks, you usually end up where you belong, that is not in Europe.

 

And then one day Russians come and exile the hell out of them... Right?

 

Why they drop roof-knock before bombing a "house full of weapons" ? Because all the employes of bakery leaves it before the main bombing after a roof knock, they say. Appearently Russian pilots know well its not an enemy target.

 

Well I don't know about where Turks belong to but I know what Serbs used to; Turkish rule for 500 years. And I know this will make you upset but yes there is such thing as "BOSNIANS"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnians

 

I am not a prophet, so do not know, but traitors are not liked anywhere.

 

I do not know if they dropped something before bombing, or not- this is just information from the second hand. But if was not an enemy target, then bring a reasonable argument why it was bombed?

 

Dude you are talking to a "Bosnian"
Bosnians are a made up nationality just like Yugoslavians were.
There is no ethnicity connected to the name "Bosnians" Heck majority of Bosniaks do not consider them Bosnians, rather Bosniaks.
And you can guess what Serbs and Croats think about being "Bosnian"

So saying Serbs killed Bosnians is like saying Turks killed Turks when talking about killing of the Kurds.

But that is not topic. Russia bombed civilan targets just like US and NATO did, If you dont trust me, at least trust NATO generals like Clark Mckenzie, he admit it him self, even french generals. It's all public information.

 

Looks like it is the same thing as Bosniaks for me.

 

Probably, I know you didn't say anything like it but no one can say; there is no such thing as "Bosnians". Yes there is !

 

May be for any reason or without any reason, to demoralize people, to harm anyone against Assad regime... etc...

 

I understand now. So you guys are all Bosnians but the ones I referred to the ethnic cleansing of Serbs are rather Bosniaks. Got it ! I learned something. Thanks for the explanation.

 

Tell me do you intend to write any posts as to the civilians ISIL kills? Or is your agenda to only cover one side of this lovely civil war?

 

There is no doubt Russia has attacked non ISIL, anti Assad rebels on the ground in Syria. That is one issue. Killing civilians while bombing ISIL targets is another issue.

For want of a better word, collateral damage happens on each and every bombing mission. The tragedy of war is that innocent civilians die.

Putin is only concerned about his naval base and preventing ISIL from flooding world markets with the sale of captured Syrian oil reserves that directly competes with Russian oil supplies.

As for the West you really think they give a Gawd damn who controls Syria as long as they can control that person?

 

Here a sample for collateral damage;

30 dead ISIS, 2 civilian casualties >>>>> colleteral damage

30 murdered civilian, 2 or no ISIS members >>>>> massacre, terrorism

 

Well, I do not know. I always thought that nothing is done in this world without some reasons.

 

Why the qualifiers? killing is murder right?

Here, I've fixed it for you.
30 dead ISIS, 2 civilian casualties >>>>> 32 murdered people
30 murdered civilian, 2 or no ISIS members >>>>> 30 or 32 murdered people

Lets not (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) foot around here. The purpose of war is destruction ... people, property, it doesn't really matter. Destruction till one side capitulates.

War is never right. There are times it is necessary.

 

Not quite true. Putin is concerned with an option that if IS spreads, he will have a lot of trained muslim radicals who are among IS now back to Russia.