Well, true...if a Republican said the Sun rises in the East...I'd still check a compass to make sure.
It’s Snowing in Minnesota! Yes, October Is Early for That Minnesota is um... 3000 miles south of the north pole... - - - Updated - - - you dont need a compass, just look where your prayer matt is pointing.
Polar bears can be found hundreds of miles inland. Like almost every other bear species in the world they are omnivorous, they eat anything and are basically pigs, ungulates. Like almost all other bears they are very competent swimmers and migrate thousands of miles. Humorous to us are those experts who are so arrogant to tell Canada and Russia what we should do about Polar bears, when the people giving the orders have never seen one and think they survive entirely on seals. Truth is, seals are a secondary diet. Polar bears are lazy and smart. They know they can law half asleep on the ice, next to a seal hole for days with their white paws over their black noses and wait until the stupid seal leaps out of the hole into the bear's mouth. Easy meal, but not the mainstay. They actually prefer carrion and garbage. That's why their flourishing, I think. All the trash the scientists bring with them.
That is entirely incorrect. The volume cannot be less. The coverage area is three times the previous photo. What, from your expert position at the other end of the earth you can see that the ice is what, thinner? Hardly. You don't understand sea ice, or ice at all. It's not like sand, it cannot spread as a thin layer. and accuse me of ignoring something when the entire political movement disguised as an environment thing is ignoring hundreds of years of data...the direct correlation between sun spots and earth temperatures and the fact numerous scientists who have been fired have predicted exactly what is presented here? The only people ignoring facts are the corrupt scientists and their lemming followers who get their scientific information view twitter. I would like to say nice try, but that's simply bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
Dont forget the artic ocean is salt water.... Q:At what temperature does saltwater freeze? - Anonymous (age 11) Bangor, ME A: Saltwater has a much lower freezing point (the freezing point is the temperature where something freezes) than freshwater does. And the more salt there is in it, the lower the freezing point gets. So in order to know the exact temperature that it’s going to freeze, you have to know just how salty it is. For saltwater that’s as saturated as it can possibly get (i.e. there’s no way to dissolve any more salt in it no matter how hard you tried), the freezing point is -21.1 degrees Celsius. This is when the saltwater is 23.3% salt (by weight). -Tamara p.s. As the water starts to freeze, the salt gets left in the liquid. So if you start out with water that isn't saturated with salt, as it freezes the leftover water will get saturated. So if the water starts to freeze at, for example, -10°C, more will freeze as it's cooled further until finally the last bit will freeze at -21.1°C. Thus for un-saturated saltwater the freezing happens over a range of temperatures, not all at one exact temperature, unlike pure water. Mike W.
The oceans ate my global warming. I'll ignore the absolute bull(*)(*)(*)(*) of the circular reasoning behind the "science". And just laugh at the argument because that is all it deserves.
Funny...but not as funny as Denialists who are dissed by their own candidates. Dubya, Sarah, and Mitt all say it is real and man-made....and yet? The Denialists STILL vote for them...those "fascists".
Ok, lets take a look.... Sun's 2013 Solar Activity Peak Is Weakest in 100 Years Wow, whatyaknow..... We get lots and lots of ice, when solar activity is weak.... Shocker, right? WTF?
Yes lets, why was there not rhythmic changes in ice between 2005 and 2012 as the claim based on your graph would suggest. Why is there not an 11 year and 22 year cycle of ice expansion and contraction observable. Pesky things facts. They will jump up and bite you on the arse if you dont treat them right
That is the problem with many studies nowadays, especially those relating to politics even in the slightest of degrees.
Id be willing to bet there is a direct correlation between the suns output and earths temperature. Its kinda why its hotter during the day, than it is at night. Its really common sense.
Then you can help the other poster prove me wrong. But first you might want to check exactly what activity means when we are talking about the sun
There is output in irradiance but there is also magnetic activity. While irradiance is rathet straight forward the effect of the suns magnetic field is poorly understood anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar.
Really? You dont believe there is a direct correlation between the suns output and earths temperature? I dont think, Im the one who needs to do the googleing....
If it is poorly understood how can you be so confident of the causality then - - - Updated - - - You have show me the variance exists in the first place
When correct correlation models are applied global temperature correlates to solar activity better than any other single variable including CO2.
