Discussion in '9/11' started by longknife, May 13, 2016.
You also disagree with me. What's new?
That's all you've got? Nothing about the evidence provided and a change in what was believed by prominent, "expert" truthers such as Chandler, Cole, and Legge?
No Gamolon, the entire 911 Official Conspiracy Theory is utterly impossible, and contradicted by many, perhaps all, the facts available. And that doesn't count the facts suppressed by the government, like the entire forensic scene at WTC.
I don't believe the statements of "experts" who earn their living on government contracts. Their bias is obvious--they are effectively sycophants for the government.
It's experts like Dennis Cimino and those over at Pilots For Truth or Architects & Engineers that influence my decisions. People interested only in the truth.
not according to Bobby's 28 redacted pages ... show your evidence of Bush and Israel or fold your cards ... truthers are shameless liars ...
Talk about shameless liars, the 28 now declassified pages are not mine, I didn't invent them. I keep telling you to check the mirror before you falsely accuse others of what you do.
Saudis don't approve visas.. The US Consulate in KSA approves visas.. and six of the hijackers used fake or stolen IDs.
Ah, Mr. Literal responds again ...
Neither Bush nor the Israelis had anything to do with 9-11.. And, the SAG did not fund the attack. The Saudis had NOTHING to gain from attacking the US.. This was Bin Laden's vengeance on the US and Saudi Arabia for revoking his citizenship and declaring AQ a terrorist organization in 1994.
Because Mr. Hobby likes to make things up for his hobby.
So say you and our illustrious and mendacious government....
no, she is right ... American consular officers issue visas for foreigners to travel to the US in American consulates or embassies ...
I did not deny that Shine.
The larger point is that the official story is a hoax. Some understand that, some are still entranced.
Look Eleuthra.. Your remark was ignorant.. I would chalk it up to the probability that you have NEVER applied for a visa.
Thank you, shinebox....
That would be a correct assumption Margot, but completely irrelevant to the subject at hand.
Saudi did play some minor role in the charade, but it WAS a charade on 911. THAT is the larger point--it was a charade meant to deceive.
busted in a lie ... but nice try ...
off topic ...
You may or may not be right (depending on whether 9/11 was truly and completely an inside job or not) but it's what you do all the time when confronted by inconvenient (to you) facts, Mr. Hypocrite. If it was an inside job (or not), did the Saudi royal family contribute in any way? That's the question here.
For me it was an inside job even if it was only a stand down. The historical/irrefutable facts prove the highest levels within the US government stood down on 9/11 because they knew 9/11 was going to take place and did NOTHING of any significance to prevent it from going to completion. That there was more to it than that is also supported by an overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence. That includes improbable multiple convenient coincidences that needed to happen all on the same day and of course, a massive coverup by the same suspects following 9/11.
show me evidence that the Saudi Royal Family was involved ... not that I really care because that would conflict with the theories that you believe in ... get a new hobby Bobby ...
Posting your phony BS as usual Shiner? You keep asking me to show you evidence. What is it you don't understand about that I don't own any evidence as I keep telling you? I don't know if the Saudi royal family was involved or not, the OCT strongly suggests they were, I didn't make the claim. If you believe the OCT, then you believe it's quite possible.
No **** Sherlock, why didn't you just stop right there?
It doesn't conflict with anything I believe in, that's a bunch of bull excrement. Unlike you, one thing I definitely don't believe in is the OCT.
It's YOUR hobby, remember? Are you on the sauce again and forgot whose hobby it is?
I am so tired of people trying to say that the there was no official Saudi involvement. If anyone could read section 7 of the 9-11 report and then the recently released file 17 and not come to the conclusion that they were involved then the person making that conclusion is total idiot . The evidence is overwhelming .they did it . Simple as that .
No, according to the thread topic and subsequent post, it's not a question.
Based on what you have said, you don't agree with that OPs original sentiment that the Saudi's knowingly funded 9/11. It that correct Bob?
then show me where in the OCT "strongly suggests" they were ... yeah I know you don't own any evidence Bob, but you certainly have opinions and theories ... so, show me ...
That's incorrect, the topic title is an unverified claim, so it is very questionable.
I don't agree or disagree, it is an unverified claim by the thread's author.
Separate names with a comma.