'Secret plans to evacuate the Queen if no-deal Brexit causes riots'

There are going to be riots whether it's no-deal or not, dumbos! And the rioting will be more intense and prolonged if it's a fudge, or there's the slightest whiff of sophistry in a virtual remain scenario - then it'll really be full-on.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/secret-plans-evacuate-queen-no-13945588

 

So long as the Duke doesnt drive....

 

The People VERSUS The Queen

As the Queen packs her bags to tuck tail and run as the People reclaim London that is rightfully ours, not hers, this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end.

But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.

Comrades, how long shall we give the Queen to evacuate London - 48 hours or 48 days?

48 hours was how long we gave the neo-Nazi Saddam Hussein and his sons to pack their bags and get out of Iraq, but he didn't heed our warning and he paid with his life.

Anyway, it's good to know that the Queen is packing her bags. It wouldn't be wise to overstay her welcome like Saddam foolishly did.

"Trooping the colours at Buckingham Palace"?

Comrades, we may indeed soon have the opportunity to troop the People's colour in Buckingham Palace and, as we know, the People's colour is RED!



When we, the People raise our flag in struggle against the Queen, we shall be defended using all means necessary by the Red Army, the army of the People, as always.

Let us recall our historic victories in recent years.

1945 - The Elbe, Germany


Raising a Flag over the Reichstag

1989 - Malta Summit





2011 - London, the Statue of President Ronald Reagan


Comrades, when the Queen "evacuates" London, before she is booted out by the People, shall we meet there once again to celebrate our latest victory?

The People, united, shall never be defeated!

Let's Go!

 

....a hint for you...its not reeeeally happening..... she's not reeeeally leaving...

 

I needed a chuckle today, thanks my brother.

 

You're obsession with Britain and fake news continues I see.

 

Comrades, they sneered before the people stormed the Bastille.
They sneered too before the Boston Tea Party.
Learning nothing, they sneered again before the Assault on the Winter Palace.

We're talking about a revolution and the Queen had better run, run, run ..

 

...what!!??....you do know this is the 21st Century are you living in right...2019...I mean I know you live on a different planet than the rest of us but surely not in a different time as well??

excellent....I'm sure she'll take your thoughts on board....will we be seeing you fighting off the forces of oppression...storming the railings of Buck House whilst clutching your wee baggie...

 

I'm not quite as dumb or naive as you think mate!

 

My friend, I must apologise. I mistook you for someone else! Please excuse my ‘jumping of the gun’

 

No problemo James - it happens in this medium.

 

Oh that's not the best way to conflate science fiction with reality. This is -

So long as she is boarding a ship or plane to leave the country never to come back, I don't care.

What, armed with only a Twitter account?
I don't think so.




Full story, see my blog post - FRIDAY, 27 JANUARY 2017 - 'Freedom fighter' threatened Queen - front page news

I see my role more as addressing the nation on TV, like that time in 2008.

That's a better use of TV time than any ten minutes featuring any of the Queen's UK Prime Ministers or First Ministers of Scotland.

 

splendid....mad as a mad thing on mad Friday.....

 

I seem to have rather a lot of science qualifications for someone whom you allege to be "mad".

 

Just because a person has a lot of science qualifications, doesn't mean that person also doesn't have mental health issues.

 

Evacuate the queen and don't tell anyone where they took her. Maybe it looks different if you're used to it all your life, but isn't it time to get rid of the outdated monarchy?

 

just follow his sheer brilliance on the interweb....
I think Trump may be a fan as one of Pete's more optimistic plans and indeed a potential key to success in the Afghan war was to build a 465Km defensive wall from Kabul to Pakistan with "pillboxs" every 200 meters which would have conservatively required around 40K to 50K troops to man them....and then there was the anti-handcuffs....

​

clever chap huh......

And in Pete's (actually its Alistair) own words..

 

I think we can both agree that the success of the Maginot Line during WWII demonstrated once and for all how effective fixed emplacements are against a highly mobile enemy

 

my bad for suggesting you're mad,
but I had to add the image of an unclad...

Alistair with his mouse pad....
strategically positioned over his wee lad...
writing to the lonely hearts in the small ads

 

Since the Queen did not need evacuation during WW2 I somewhat doubt a small group of right wing thugs are going to scare her.

 

Possibly, but then we look across the pond at recent US presidents and think maybe we will let her represent us for a while longer!

 

Apologies. My website does not allow hotlinking of images.
You have to visit my webpage first at this link http://peterdow.scienceontheweb.net/
then click the image link
to see a photograph of me with my science qualifications on the wall behind me.

 

Indeed. Had Albert Einstein not fled the Nazis and been imprisoned in a concentration camp, I am sure he would have had mental health issues - stress.

 

Trump met with the Queen in July 2018 so I think it is safer to assume that Trump is a fan of the Queen, which I am not.

I do believe that both Trump and I are fans of Condoleezza Rice.

Well look since you have gotten on the topic of Afghanistan in a topic about evacuating the Queen, and noting -
* how the Afghan monarchy evacuated itself from Afghanistan, not least because of the pressure from the Soviet Union and
* how the U.S. was content to support Saudi-funded and Pakistani-trained Mujahadeen to drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan and install the Saudi-Pakistani puppet regime of the Taliban
* how the Saudi-funded and the Pakistan-trained al Qaeda led by Bin Laden launched the 9/11 attacks on the US
* how Saudi Arabia and Pakistan deceitfully blamed their secret agent puppet regime of the Taliban alone for hosting Bin Laden when in truth the state sponsors of 9/11 terrorism that really needed REGIME CHANGE were in fact Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, not just their puppet Taliban regime
* how Bin Laden was finally corned in a safe house provided for him by Pakistani Military Intelligence - the ISI - very close to the Pakistani military academy, the equivalent of West Point
then a considered analysis of the whole Afghanistan situation proves that is not always the case that the enemy (Saudi-Pakistan) of one's enemy (the Soviets) is one's friend and so the US ought to be a lot more careful than to continue "no strings" trading with Saudi Arabia and providing military support to Pakistan and charging like bulls at a red flag waved at them by the Taliban, a puppet regime of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan that the US is no more able to charge at than a bull is able to charge at the matador.

Maybe a better strategy would have been to come to some arrangement with the Soviets about Afghanistan?
Considering
Afghanistan in the 1950s and ’60s
it is fair to note that UN Security Council rivalry being exacerbated by the Islamists has not served Afghanistan well.

Perhaps now the UNSC countries would reflect on where they have got to in Afghanistan at each other's throats and instead co-operate to regime-change Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, as the price for sponsoring terrorism?

If so, I have a plan for that too, which depends on seizure of Saudi oil tankers to impose the West as the sole traders of Gulf oil and depends on seizing Arab and Pakistani (and Iranian too) satellite TV to reveal to their populations how they have all been manipulated by their regimes and wouldn't it be so much better to transition to a proper liberal democracy.

However, that wasn't the approach. Only the Taliban was to be held accountable under the Bush Doctrine and regime-changed and so the military was sent into Afghanistan, via Pakistani roads, making our supplies a hostage to Pakistani consent and indeed subject to blackmail by Pakistan, rendering any attempt to hold Pakistan fully accountable for sponsoring the Taliban pretty much a lost cause from day one.

We can discuss military ground war tactics in Afghanistan if you wish but we really ought to set such discussions in the correct overall intelligence framework first, which I have now done.

 

If Brexit doesn't go through, there could be riots. If it goes through no deal, riots could happen. Either way, just shoot the rioters.