Answer one of the 50 questions then we'll talk. As long as you guys run from the tough questions there is no need to discuss anything. They are really tough questions as you debunkers are proving.
I did answer one. Not sitting through 5 hours of drivel. Post a timestamp to what you consider the best evidence of your OP video. That is, if you've even watched them.
I did post the 50 questions. They are in the OP. What are you afraid of? Are you afraid of the truth? The truth is posted in the OP. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=337372&p=1063453437#post1063453437
You only posted links to videos you did not post any questions. It is you running away in fear from a reasonable debate.
I am not running from anything. I posted three videos with 50 very important questions which debunk the truth debunkers. If you would like to take a shot at answering any one of them then please do. Expose yourself as the professional debunkers have done.
I'm NOT going to sit through 5 hours of truther drek,when you can just post a list of the '50 questions' in here Are YOU afraid?
I watched 22 minutes, saw quotes taken out of context, lies and not a single question. sucks to be truther.
Posts like this are exactly why he, I and every other person with more intelligence than a dyslexic grapefruit will no longer talk to you. By simply blanket-attacking the mountain of evidence presented to you with all-encompassing words like "speculation", you deliberately try to avoid actually addressing the individual and specific points made by the OP. It's a fallacy known as "tarring everything with the same brush". You aren't acknowledging what he has posted, you aren't addressing what he has posted and you aren't discrediting what he has posted. Effectively, he's critically looking at evidence, and you're using political fallacy. You haven't even watched his video and you know it. You've every right to have an opinion about something, but you can't expect anybody who is rational to argue with you when you won't acknowledge evidence that you are wrong. These threads are frankly ridiculous. Every single one is precisely the same. You provide literally zero evidence to back up anything you are saying, but quite jovially spend days at a time spectacularly denying everything and anything which the other poster links to support his own claims, however watertight it might be. That is not debate. It is playschool.
Is asking you troothers to back up your (*)(*)(*)(*), asking too much?hours of youtube pabulum doesn't cut it...
Well he said watch for questions there were none. There were lies. You attack me. Nice now ask a question. Not based on lies
Yes you are clearly. Questions are not evidence. They debunk nothing. Debunkers state facts. You have yet to state a single fact or demonstrate any piece of evidence
Fine. I'll answer all 50 questions in the same way you asked them. The answers to all 50 questions posed in the OP can be found at the links below. http://www.debunking911.com/ http://www.911myths.com/
statements like that, demonstrating blatant denial prove the truthers won, and the official story is dead!
Your right it is not a theory but a fantasy. Even theories have some supporting evidence. Can't indict based on fantasy
Indeed. It is time for indictments. What is interesting is that people do not realize, until too late, that they will get thrown under the bus in a heartbeat. They should watch "Breaking Bad." Vince Foster was a perfect example. The really smart ones have already shudup.
this is already gone viral though. there is a limit to how high you can stack the fraud heap before even the most staunch ostrich starts to feel the heat and pulls his head out to look around.
