Standards lowered to produce first female Green Beret.....

Your false attacks, outright false claims, against an American soldier whose truck was hit by an RPG, knocked unconscious and with broken bones, claiming she was responsible for her own capture and torture as a POW because she is female is as unthinkably outrageous and hatred of the military as it gets.

That NO man on these threads dare even mention the absurdity of your claiming soldiers pick their own caliber and brand of rifle and decide which and how much ammo to carry, while also silent you your personal attacks against that American POW, demonstrates these are nothing but hate-on-women threads and nothing more. When ex-military directly or sub-silento support grotesquely false claims to attack and sneer at a wounded, tortured American POW because she is female, it demonstrates that there needs to be a MAJOR blow out of such men remaining in the US military. FIRE THEM. Fire them all.

 

While you were in service, per Greatax's claim, what models and caliber rifles were you allowed to select from, which brand and rifle did you select, and how much ammo and how many magazines did you decide you'd carry? Obviously you didn't pick andM16. So what did you select yourself to carry?

With every soldier each carrying their own caliber rifle/long gun and presumably pistol brand and caliber too, did this cause any logistics problems for all the different ammo requirements - 5.56, 30.06, .308, 7.62-39, 12 gauge, 50 cal, 9mm, 45acp... How'd what you selected compare to what others selected? Does it poise any problems with each soldier having to be trained how to maintain their own particularly firearms?

Greatax claims that's how it works and that Lynch is responsible for her own capture for having selected an M16 and not having enough ammo.

 

And here you demonstrate very clearly that you have no idea what you are talking about. No one is saying you need the fastest or strongest person to do the job.
What is being said is that the job has a certain requirements like carrying heavy weights up and down the sides of a mountain and still be able to take the fight to the enemy when you get to where you are going, or sprinting from cover to cover while under fire, or being able to carry a wounded teammate on your back and still move out then being able to meet that standard is what matters. Not being the strongest or fastest.

But hey if you want to continue on debating the straw man that you made up carry on. It actually seems to be about all your good at.

 

Well we weren't allowed to select what kind of service rifle, sidearm or weapon we would be issued.

Basically you had no choice what service rifle you were issued.

When I served the Marine Corps had three different service rifles.

The M-14 that was issued to all FMF units.

The M-1 Garand that was issued to all Marine security forces, Marine Baracks and ship detachment.

The M-16 A1 that was issued to all Marines who had WestPac orders and found themselves in the Republic of Vietnam.

It just not logistics of keeping it down to just two different size cartridges when troops have to resupplied out in the field. In Vietnam it was 5.56 and 7.62 machine gun belts. But having replacement parts for those weapons in inventory.

Look at WW ll, M-1 Garand, M-1 carbine, Thompson sub machine guns, M-3 sub machine guns, requiring three different size cartridges. The armor requiring a large inventory of spare pars to keep all of those weapons popping.

 

No one mentions it because in all likelihood Greataxe never said what you are claiming he said. I even skimmed back a few pages and he said nothing even close to what you are claiming.
Sounds just like another lie to add to the very long list of lies you have spewed in the last few days.
A normal person would be embarrassed to be caught in as many lies as you have but I guess for those with no integrity it really doesn’t matter.

 

You have to realize, there are a handfull of posters that many of us ignore for various for many reasons.

Now I am not naming names, but pretty much anybody that posts racially charged (racist) postings, I generally put on my ignore list. And this is a rapidly growing list. Anybody that posts over and over again posts that denigrate one race over another generally finds themselves in the position where I no longer want to see their coprolite.

Sadly, a great many that would be better served in a forum like Stormfront have found their way here. So do not even believe for a moment that some who remain silent at what some say is the same as agreement.

Some of us do not even see the postings of people who see non-Europeans as "sub-human".