Stop Blaming Climate Change For California’s Fires

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Josephwalker, Aug 25, 2020.

  1. Mircea

    Mircea Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2015
    Messages:
    3,914
    Likes Received:
    1,147
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Global warming nutters deserve to be smeered [sic].

    I can list several that have extremist views:

    Hansen
    Erdenhofer
    Anderson

    ...just to name a few.

    Note than Hansen is the Imperial Grand Kleagel Wizard and Chief Architect of the global nonsense.

    Anderson is Professor Kevin Anderson, Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.

    There is absolutely nothing that can be done about "Global Warming."

    That is the Big Lie.

    Peak CO2 levels in the previous 8 recorded Inter-Glacial Periods range from 272 ppm to 298 ppm.

    Sea levels in the 8 previous recorded Inter-Glacial Periods ranged from 4 meters to 14 meters HIGHER than present.

    Global temperatures in the 8 previous recorded Inter-Glacial Periods ranged from 7.5°F to 15.3°F WARMER than present.

    So.....we ruin everyone's lives and destroy economies to reduce CO2 to 290 ppm and the sea levels still rise another 4 meters to 14 meters and average global temperatures still rise another 7.5°F to 15.3°F.

    You cannot demonstrate why this particular Inter-Glacial Period should be different than all the others.
     
  2. Death

    Death Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,873
    Likes Received:
    580
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Mircea you stated:
    "Global warming nutters deserve to be smeered (sic)".

    1. I am glad you noticed the spelling mistake but your comment still reflects your lack of rationality and emotions.

    2. You stated :" I can list several that have extremist views:

    Hansen
    Erdenhofer
    Anderson

    ...just to name a few."

    Yes you could, it still does not mean global warming does not exist. All it shows is youyr petulance and need to try smear all people you disagree with as having the same beliefs.

    3. You stated:

    "Note than Hansen is the Imperial Grand Kleagel Wizard and Chief Architect of the global nonsense.

    Anderson is Professor Kevin Anderson, Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research."

    And so? The fact you disagree with them means what? Using your "logic: anyone who disagrees with you should be attacked personally because you are too lazy and intellectually dishonest to address the global warming issues they raise. You avoid those issues and instead try engage in name calling. so? Other than show you avoid debate and try name call what have you acheived in yur responses other than to show you do not know how to discuss the global warming issues?

    You stated:

    "There is absolutely nothing that can be done about "Global Warming.

    That is the Big Lie.

    Peak CO2 levels in the previous 8 recorded Inter-Glacial Periods range from 272 ppm to 298 ppm.

    Sea levels in the 8 previous recorded Inter-Glacial Periods ranged from 4 meters to 14 meters HIGHER than present.

    Global temperatures in the 8 previous recorded Inter-Glacial Periods ranged from 7.5°F to 15.3°F WARMER than present.

    So.....we ruin everyone's lives and destroy economies to reduce CO2 to 290 ppm and the sea levels still rise another 4 meters to 14 meters and average global temperatures still rise another 7.5°F to 15.3°F.

    You cannot demonstrate why this particular Inter-Glacial Period should be different than all the others."

    The above 7 disjointed sentences make no sense. To start with no one who discusses the consequences of global warming says nothing can be done about it. You do. You make that false assumption and project it on people you think you disagree with. That exercise is illogical. Next your comments about we should not reduce CO2 levels because it won't change anything loss also nonsensical. Lowering CO@ levels will of course have benefits. The fact you make a unilateral announcement or declaration it won't change anything with zero proof for your position speaks loudly again as to your inability to discuss the issues. You present nothing but one sided unilateral subjective statements with zero proof. That is not debating its just self entitled taunts. Finally your petulant taunt about "you cannnot demonstrate"... makes no sense. It has been demonstrated and proven. While we are at it since you want to correct my spelling, cannot in the sentence you use is separated not joined.

    The fact you disagree with what has been demonstrated and proven does not mean it hasn't been proven, it simply means you disagree with it and you pose that if you disagree with something it can't exist. That is illogical.

    This ends my responses and on to ignore with you. If you do not want to debate the actual issues and limit yourself to name calling and taunts with no reference to anything to back your positions it is pointless responding to you. You make it clear you are only interestedin making unilateral pronouncements. Go ahead. That's why we have an ignore button. Buh bye now.
     
  3. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    2,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The climate alarmist narrative about wildfires cannot be sustained by the data.
    The Hill Is Wrong, Climate Change Is Grossly Overemphasized as a Factor Causing Wildfires
    WILDFIRES OCTOBER 11, 2021
    Near the top of a Google news search for the phrase “climate change” today turns up a story in The Hill claiming the media is failing to properly place the blame for wildfires on climate change. This is false. Hundreds of stories over the past two years alone have blamed climate change for wildfires. To be accurate, they are all wrong. Data do not show a significant increase in the number of wildfires or the acreage burned by them. As a result, rather than underrepresenting climate change as a cause of wildfires, the mainstream media is, in fact, giving misplaced emphasis on climate change as a factor in wildfires. . . .
     
  4. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    2,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sunsettommy likes this.
  5. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    2,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  6. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    2,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  7. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    2,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  8. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    2,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  9. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    2,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

Share This Page