No, SCOTUS did not end the case, despite what some say. It was sent back to the Colorado commission to take in account the Baker's 1st Amendment beliefs.
Because I was responding to this post, in which you were mentioned: Do you know why? So "Moi" is "me?"
Not sure where in the bible you get that it "does not permit discrimination". And don't see the conflict with the other parts. And in general tend to believe that people should be left to live their lives by whatever interpretation of whatever doctrine they choose as long as they don't harm anyone else AND I don't consider the inconvenience of needing to go to an alternate bakery to get your two dick one union wedding cake to rise to the level of a harm that the government should even consider being involved.
Yeah, which is why he didn't kick them out of his shop, but instead offered them any product that was in there. He just couldn't use his artistic skills to custom make a cake that represents something that he disagrees with.
Yeah, but you seem to be under the impression that the two cases are connected - that what is now before the Colorado commission came from the Supreme Court's earlier decision.