I agree. I don't know who was the first to say this, but it goes like this. Gerrymandering is the process of our representatives choosing their voters instead of the voters choosing their representatives. That just about sums it up in my opinion.
The Constitution did NOT give permission to political parties for gerrymandering. When the Constitution was written, there were no political parties in America. They first formed during Washington's second term, long after the Constitution was written.
It does not deny gerrymandering either. Possibly, because of your point that there were no real political parties, but maybe because it is a State issue. Gerrymandering only impacts Representatives of a State sent to DC and for State elections. It does not impact Senators or Presidential elections. Bottom line, gerrymandering is solely a State issue and is not a Federal issue. States have a right to set their congressional boundaries without Federal interference or input. It makes sense as to SCOTUS's ruling.
And states have been trying to stop it. This is a huge coup by the minority party. It will help them keep control of power for awhile.
Nope else I wouldn't have dismissed it as another inane comment as if the Republicans could block the black vote.