What does? Why in the world would I need to do that? Neither I nor anyone else (other than those who were intimately involved) can explain what exactly happened at the Pentagon. As Koko posted and I will be just as direct, there is absolutely no reason for me to be required to have an explanation for what happened at the Pentagon whether I agree or disagree that AA77 impacted the Pentagon. And I never claimed I disagree that AA77 impacted the Pentagon, I simply am completely dissatisfied with the official explanation which is not based on any legitimate investigation. It's a story one can only accept on faith as you have done. The key is that no one has ever proven beyond doubt the official claim that AA77 impacted the Pentagon. Everything about the official story (including the Pentagon massacre) stinks the putrid smell of a coverup. It isn't my job to prove or disprove anything or to concoct some alternate story. It is absolutely the job and the mandated duty of the US government to prove beyond any doubt their claim that AA77 impacted the Pentagon. All the shenanigans conducted by the US government strongly point to their story being a lie. If it wasn't a lie, they would have been able to prove it beyond any doubt. And this is exactly what I meant by transparency. They've done everything in their power to suppress evidence including wholesale denials of FOIA requests for illegitimate or no reason at all.