The GOP's tax cut just keeps getting worse

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MrTLegal, Feb 11, 2019.

  1. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    21,029
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://theweek.com/articles/822464/gops-tax-cut-just-keeps-getting-worse

    So let's review 5 of the alleged goals from the GOP Tax Cut.

    1) Boost Worker's Wages.
    - Once you adjust for inflation, worker's wages have not budged since Trump took office.
    #Fail
    2) Create Jobs. The number of new jobs created is almost precisely the same trend line as before the law was passed.
    upload_2019-2-11_10-38-8.png
    #Fail
    3) Create more investment.
    - New capital good orders (tracked by the Commerce Department) and new capital investment by small businesses barely changed from the same trend line.
    #Fail
    4) Return Corporate Profits from Overseas.
    - The overall trend of keeping money overseas has not shifted in the slightest.
    #Fail.
    5) Result in a larger tax rebate for most voters.
    - Tax Refunds are down an average of Eight Percent so far.
    #Fail

    All five of those alleged goals are failing. At best, the GOP was sloppy and bungled the implementation of its most significant policy initiative. At worst, the GOP intentionally deceived the American people solely to make corporate profits higher. Either way, the Government Accountability Office has already concluded that the Trump administration ****ed up the Federal Tax Withholdings.

    The only goal, the real goal, of the GOP tax cut is to drastically increase corporate profits. And by that standard, it was a resounding success. Corporate tax revenue is down 31%.

    Oh, and the federal deficit has increased by 17% despite a booming economy.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2019
    Cubed and AZ. like this.
  2. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    18,735
    Likes Received:
    4,580
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Speaking purely from the standpoint of being retired, with a 'comfortable' but by no means FAT income, the Trump tax cut saved me about $1,000 in taxes overall. Not a big deal, really.

    What pisses me off is that neither Democrats or Republicans EVER do ANYTHING about getting rid of all the damned tax loopholes, tax shelters, exclusions, exemptions, deductions, and "carried interest". NOBODY does anything about those things -- not a radical, "populist" like Obama, not a hard-core Right-winger like Trump -- NOBODY.... So, both "Fat Cat" Republicans AND "Limousine Liberal" Democrats laugh all the way to the bank....

    And I still say that horribly unfair taxation is a much grearter problem than "income inequality". You could put the überwealthy in a 99% tax bracket, but if they REALLY end up paying little or nothing in taxes, what really happened...? :bounce:
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2019
  3. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    21,029
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mentioned all of the tax loopholes, etc. and one of the supposed goals of the GOP tax cut was to also make tax much easier to understand. But they only rejiggered a bunch of deductions and loopholes and made tax lawyers more valuable than ever (the various firms with tax practices are nearly all adding more employees).

    The running joke amongst tax accountants and CPAs is that the bill should have been called the "Tax Jobs and Jobs Cuts Act."
     
    Cubed and AZ. like this.
  4. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    18,735
    Likes Received:
    4,580
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, as I indicated, this certainly wasn't what I would have wanted in a "tax cut" bill, but nobody ever listens to "little" people like me -- not my fine Republican Senator from Colorado, Cory Gardner, or my fine Democrat Senator from Colorado, Michael Bennet....

    But, I guess that if I'm about a 'grand' better off with Trump's piss-ant tax 'overhaul', then that "beats a poke in the eye with a sharp stick" -- which is all I ever got from Comrade Obama....
     
    headhawg7, ArchStanton and Mrlucky like this.
  5. Bearack

    Bearack Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    834
    Likes Received:
    212
    Trophy Points:
    43
    A flat tax would be the most equitable with 0 tax loopholes.
     
  6. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    18,735
    Likes Received:
    4,580
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I agree... and I can promise you -- that will NEVER happen so long as we have no one to represent us but the Republican and Democrat Parties.
     
  7. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    5,525
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/income-tax-revenues-trump-tax-cuts-economic-growth/

    "The latest monthly budget report from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office finds that revenues from federal income taxes were $76 billion higher in the first half of this year, compared with the first half of 2017. That's a 9% jump, even though the lower income tax withholding schedules went into effect in February.

    The CBO says the gain "largely reflects increases in wages and salaries.""
     
    Bondo likes this.
  8. Kode

    Kode Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    17,094
    Likes Received:
    3,823
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What year? 2017 income reported in 2018? Or 2018 income reported this year?
     
  9. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    6,918
    Likes Received:
    1,662
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nobody seems to understand the purpose of the tax cuts. The idea was allow american companies to be more competitive in the international marketplace by putting their tax rates in line with those of other countries. The personal tax cuts had nothing to do with it other than to help sell it to the public. If they didn't remove tax shelters at the same time then they are greedy, corrupt and incompetent. That is why we refer to it as a swamp.
     
    headhawg7 likes this.
  10. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    27,351
    Likes Received:
    4,195
    Trophy Points:
    113
  11. Kode

    Kode Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    17,094
    Likes Received:
    3,823
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, there has been more investment ..... in stock buybacks as the article mentions. And it talks about the benefits for shareholders. But what most people don't know is that 60% of shares are held by corporate insiders and the buybacks serve to boost their income. And that began after Clinton got laws passed limiting CEO salaries to $1 million because corporate elite wanted to find a way around that law. And now, with corporations up against a wall in their effort to expand markets, sales, revenue, and growth, the buybacks keep the incomes growing for the rich corporatists.
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  12. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    21,029
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you know that your article is more than six months old?
     
  13. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    21,029
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes.

    Tax revenue from corporations are down 31%.
    Tax revenue, once inflation is factored in, is down between 4 and 9 percent.
     
  14. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    5,525
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Are you suggesting that revenue has decreased since then?
     
  15. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    21,029
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes.

    And your report did not account for inflation.
     
  16. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    21,029
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The OP explicitly addresses that goal, along with several others.

    But here is some more information on why that particular goal failed.

     
    Cubed likes this.
  17. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    5,525
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How much has revenue decreased...has to be a lot from 9% to below what it was under Obama's last qtr.
     
  18. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    21,029
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    4-9% once you factor inflation

    See post #13.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2019
  19. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    5,525
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’ll yake the CBO over the opinion piece of a leftist PAC
     
    Thirty6BelowZero likes this.
  20. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    21,029
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are explicitly taking an opinion piece of a right wing PAC.

    Unless you want to quote where the CBO evaluated tax revenue post inflation in your 7 month old article?
     

Share This Page