WRONG!!! Those who offend the "official story" as fake and so on are the prosecutors and every sort of law and relationship has in content rule #1: Proof your accusing! So where is the proof that it was no Airliner? What was it then? To say only "it was no airliner" but not being able to tell what it was then is only ridiculous BS of claiming nonsense - point! I know ... you will come with that and this other "detail" about ... but ALL OF THEM were and are still refuted! Anyone who claims that the impact area is too small is telling BS, because it is fitting like a finger print for the Airliner in dimension! Alone at this point was so much total BS delivered from Truthers to declare that it does not fit ... a fairy tale is telling more truth! And this is going on point for point a tissue of Pentagon! And finally again: Who declares and tells "it was no plane!" must be able to give a serious, working alternative or his / her declaring is only BS blabbering!