The CIT "investigators" led the witness by loading their questions. His interpretation of what they asked is not what you claim, since he has already said he walked out straight after the WTC second plane impact. It is entirely unambiguous. False! He quite specifically talks about it. NOW AGAIN! https://www.loc.gov/item/afc911000155/ 0:56 RR: “I stopped at the south loading dock and I relieved one [audio gap] and as I was sitting there, there was a TV that’s right there, and uh… all of a sudden the news flash came across the TV and said the World Trade Center has been bombed. And first thing that came to my mind was New York City because I’m from New York and I start thinking about my parents. So after I though about it, I looked again, and they said that it was another plane coming on the television. And then my Sergeant, Sergeant Woolridge, Woody, he called and he said hey Rob listen, we’re going to threat con Delta. As I hang up the phone [audio gap] the plane hit the building. It all came at the same time, watching the TV, it was like, it was almost timed, for preciseness. So as I hung up the phone and I ran to the center of the dock and I looked up, and I saw another plane flying around the south parking lot. This was about like 9:12, 9:11 in the morning. And then there was dust - stuff coming from the ceiling, and you could hear people scream. So what I did was I turned around, and I drew out my weapon, I didn’t know what was going on, I thought we was being invaded, I didn’t know what was happening. So I ran back into south loading and I start forcing people out of the building.” Quite clearly he is not talking about the Pentagon impact. It is TOO early and he's just seen the TV and talks about a second plane coming in to NY. And yet he quite specifically says 9.12/11. He also says the plane is going extremely fast - why do keep ignoring this!? No groping. He says quite specifically he saw it on TV and walked outside. Yours is the worst example in terms of accuracy! He says it was doing a U-turn, extremely fast, 25 minutes before the Pentagon crash and in a direction he could not possibly see. MEH! That is exactly what YOU are doing and very badly. Yes, it's called Occam's Razor. The DNA, the plane parts and the witnesses confirm a plane impact. Nothing about this scenario is inconsistent with reality. Whereas, plane part sprinkling gnomes, DNA/body dismembering/burning and redistribution, a whole host of on site personnel privy to the hoax, invisible disappearing actual flight 77, light pole explosion technicians et al. That is ridiculous! He's not clear on a whole host of things, but it's clear it was straight after the WTC second plane. It doing a U-turn, extremely fast and 25 minutes early says you are ignoring major points to create your bullshit scenario. My opinion is that he probably saw the actual plane a few minutes before it impacted doing a sweep around and got his bearings/height wrong. His testimony would be torn to shreds in a law court.