The white anxiety behind Steve King’s appalling remarks

Mostly white people. You analogy is barbaric.

 

Thanks. You show your inability to grasp what is real. As many lefites support sharia as righties do.
But I'm willing to look into any credible evidence you have. So I guess this will end your entries into this thread.

 

Not at all. There are a few lefties that do point out how awful Sharia law is for humanity but the majority never do. I recall one milk toast lefty president who refused to even say the words "Radical Islamic Terrorism". Instead he acted as an apologist for their atrocities. The hypocrisy is obvious. No need to provide "proof".

For your own education here is Bill Mahr's view:



He gets criticized often by his fellow libs for those views.

 

Government can select people at random placing them together and voila a society has been created?

 

You are proving your point by showing me a lefty who is against sharia law?
How about finding a credible lefty supporting sharia law. I doubt there are many, if any,. But there's always the nutters.

 

LOL! I am showing you a lefty admitting that lefties support it.

 

Did he name those lefties? Were they his guests? Who are these lefties?

 

They are middle class (or above) insulated, white, chardonnay socialists. They have zero experience of Islam, aside from that which serves their virtue signalling. They are dangerous idiots.

 

It's very funny, to me, that of the three Trump fans I know, two are brown and one is gay. All the ideologically obsessed lefties I know are white. Every last one of them.

 

And their support is what, exactly?

 

LOL! Bill Mahr is the exception on this, not the rule. Have you ever seen goofy lefty Ben Affleck defend Islam? It is sickening.

 

Then you could be filling the pages up with names.

No. I have not.

 

I am not surprised that you know nothing about any of this.

 

I am not surprised you can't name names. Thanks for playing.

 

LOL! Name names? I already have but I am not surprised you have ignored them.

 

OK. Just link back to the post.

 

What post?

 

Would someone be kind enough to clarify what is supposed to be seen as appalling in Steve King's remarks?

 

The post that has all the names of lefties backing up your claim, that doesn't exist. Are you now trolling?
Thanks again for playing.

 

Your issue is that he wouldn't say radical ISLAMIC terrorist, even though that paints all of Islam in the same light and helps contribute to those who see us as waging war on all of Islam. That in turn contributes to the amount of money and support that the minority of Muslims who actually are fighting will receive. You wanted him to impugn an entire religion when he's only talking about the small minority of that religion. If he says radical terrorist, most folks are going to assume the Islamic part already, even if it's not so there's no point in actually saying it because you gain nothing and help your enemies by doing it.

 

The US was founded by and for whites. Our immigration policy act of 1790 only allowed whites of good character; non-whites were prevented from becoming citizens until the early 20th century, and immigration favored whites until 1965.

 

What's your evidence beside your imagination the alt-right wants to establish a Christian theocracy?

 

How does that support your statement?

You literally just said racial differences are skin deep.

So are albino sub-saharan Africans considered black or white?

 

Skin pigment clearly doesn't matter

Incorrect. I literally said, "You put to much importance on skin pigment."

You need to learn what the word 'literally' means.

Well they are considered black so pigment isn't important. Which again supports my statement.

 

Well, we now run on 20th century rules. Racists must now take a seat in the back of the bus.
We were a racist country, not so anymore. Get used to it.

BTW- look up race. We are all one race, the human race. With varying ethnicities.