Tit-for-tat: World responds to Trump's tariffs with levies on US goods

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Fallen, Jun 21, 2018.

  1. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Aka the 4th Reich
     
    Swede Hansen likes this.
  2. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Harley-Davidson will be 'taxed like never before' if it moves production overseas - Trump
    Published time: 26 Jun, 2018 14:46
    [​IMG]
    © Henry Nicholls / Reuters

    US President Donald Trump has warned legendary motorcycle maker Harley-Davidson of unprecedented tariffs if the company moves part of its production abroad.

    "A Harley-Davidson should never be built in another country – never! Their employees and customers are already very angry at them. If they move, watch, it will be the beginning of the end – they surrendered, they quit! The Aura will be gone and they will be taxed like never before!"Trump tweeted.

    "Early this year Harley-Davidson said they would move much of their plant operations in Kansas City to Thailand," Trump continued. "That was long before Tariffs were announced. Hence, they were just using Tariffs/Trade War as an excuse."

    On Monday, Harley-Davidson announced it is moving some production overseas because of retaliatory measures from the EU against Trump’s duties on steel and aluminum from the bloc. No production will be moving to Europe as a result of the tariffs, the company said. Harley's overseas manufacturing plants are in Brazil, India, Australia and Thailand.

    EU tariffs will add $2,200 to the cost of an average motorcycle, Harley-Davidson said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Tariffs will add $30-45 million to the company’s expenses this year, amounting to “an immediate and lasting detrimental impact” to its business.

    Trump responded on Monday by saying he was "surprised" by Harley's decision adding that the company’s move comes despite the fact that he “fought hard for them.” Last year, he publicly thanked the motorcycle maker for "building things in America" and criticized other companies for moving production overseas.
     
  3. ibobbrob

    ibobbrob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    12,744
    Likes Received:
    3,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The loser is America's working middle class, who will pay much more for goods due to Trump's refusal to listen to people who have experience in these matters.
     
    The Bear likes this.
  4. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    We are the largest consumer of goods by far. Other countries rely on us buying their things.

    Since consumer goods will cost more, in the end the consumers will buy less. Yes?

    If we buy less from our rivals, who will the real looser be?

    If other countries are willing to kill their economies in order to hurt ours, then thats their loss.
     
  5. ibobbrob

    ibobbrob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    12,744
    Likes Received:
    3,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not necessarily. Consumers have to live and whatever they buy will cost more. We will head for a global recession with your reasoning
    and I see the American working class suffering greatly as history has shown.
    Let's remember that the wealthy will not be affected, so Trump doesn't care.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2018
  6. Fallen

    Fallen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,905
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    They have to live...right
    Our largest export is food. We are the bread basket. I doubt that the price of food will change much. Or the cost of dipers or other such necessities for that matter. They will have no problem living.

    Consumers can live with less toys though.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2018
  7. ibobbrob

    ibobbrob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    12,744
    Likes Received:
    3,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We export a lot of livestock and farm products, and already the farmers are feeling the crunch as the countries that we export to are arranging to buy elsewhere. This tariff thing is not a good idea.
     
  8. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    REclaiming national sovereignty? What a total crock of bullshit.

    The richest, most powerful nation in the history of humankind, is not a sovereign nation.

    The rrrwf is fueled by their twisted notions of superiority and abetted by a library of bullshit superficial "high falutin" bumperstickers that they think explains all. I mean who knew how "complex" such things as democratic governance, international trade and healthcare could actually be.
     
    ronv and ibobbrob like this.
  9. alexa

    alexa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    18,965
    Likes Received:
    3,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    https://www.theguardian.com/politic...warns-trump-against-triggering-full-trade-war
     
  10. Tijuana

    Tijuana Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2017
    Messages:
    2,357
    Likes Received:
    1,260
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Simple math would indicate that the US cannot come out worse in a trade war, than the status quo. Tariffs are bad. Reciprocal tariffs are necessary, if one is to ever reach a zero tariff agreement. I think the US should match any tariff levied against us, on ALL goods from the offending nation, then offer the choice of zero tariffs as an alternative to that.
     
    Fallen likes this.
  11. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Zero trade tariffs or true free trade would mean all those international manufacturers would locate in the nation where they could produce their goods at the lowest per unit cost.


    Trump's tariffs have produced a couple of real world facts: US steel prices are 50% HIGHER that the rest of the world and US softwood lumber is 30% higher.
    You think american manufacturers can easily overcome that global competitive disadvantage?

    Trade wars are messy, they are mutually injurious, they create lots of pain and tons of unanticipated consequences that increase uncertainty, costs, inhibit investment and scuttle long term corporate strategies.

    Simple math when it comes to the international economy with its complex dependencies and relationships, isn't the kind to use in meaningfully analyzing international trade, although i realize Trump is showing you all the way in this regard.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2018
    ronv and The Bear like this.
  12. ibobbrob

    ibobbrob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    12,744
    Likes Received:
    3,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The US can come out worse in a trade war because we are not the only country that produces goods to export. Goods can be imported from and exported to countries that don't have high tariffs. The problem is that Trump never admits when he makes a mistake, a serious character flaw. He has to learn to listen to those who have experience instead of shooting from the hip, and try to be pragmatic, hardly one of his attributes.
     
  13. Tijuana

    Tijuana Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2017
    Messages:
    2,357
    Likes Received:
    1,260
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    A tariff is a tariff, regardless of what you might consider "high". Every US trading partner has the option of zero tariffs. They should consider it.

    Your notion that the status quo is fair, and tariff free, is laughable. Your notion that current barriers to trade, were negotiated free of corruption, is also laughable.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2018
  14. Tijuana

    Tijuana Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2017
    Messages:
    2,357
    Likes Received:
    1,260
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Just because a war is messy, doesn't mean it should never be fought, under any circumstance. Trade wars are not ALL about manufacturing jobs, obviously.

    The notion that ANYONE thought going in, that there would be no short term reaction, is just silly. Literally not a single person alive thought that. So huffing and puffing about the short term price to paid, isn't exactly an intelligent point. The idea is everyone gets hurt, and then they agree to free trade in the end. If you are never willing to use this tool, and always willing to accept it when others use it against you, THAT is how you lose a trade war. The US has been losing a trade war for decades now, we just haven't been firing back.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2018
  15. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When will america get rid of its tariffs? Or didn't you know that the US has the highest averaged tariff rate of the G7?

    If only you had a clue about your own tariff system.
     
  16. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Agree to free trade? Are you freeking kidding me?

    Yep all that losing on trade for decades. Who knew that losing could be so profitable?

    [​IMG]
     
  17. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Canada is scrambling to buy steel from Asia .......
     
  18. LiveUninhibited

    LiveUninhibited Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    9,783
    Likes Received:
    3,065
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think everybody loses in a trade war. But China, being theoretically a less free country, has a higher capacity to make its people endure it. And they might be more willing to endure it since Trump started it.
     
  19. Swede Hansen

    Swede Hansen Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    May 21, 2018
    Messages:
    1,954
    Likes Received:
    954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  20. ronv

    ronv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2018
    Messages:
    20,312
    Likes Received:
    8,774
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So your voting to lower your standard of living?
    Great plan. :applause:
     
    Fallen likes this.
  21. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    WEll of course. When our largest steel import/export market has such a gigantic price disparity with both our own domestic production and other foreign markets, you bet we are scrambling to establish secure supply relationships with others. Nothing like forcing us into diversifying, considering the literal and figurative resource gold mine that is Canada. A Happy accident of our birth.
     
    Margot2 likes this.
  22. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not exactly either. Using third party "transshippers" to avoid duties and sanctions is a universal trade issue. Canada and their trading partners including the US has long recognized the issue and have from time to time taken specific steps to counter this.

    But this is no longer a "normal market" condition. US steel is selling at a 50% premium in the domestic market vs the global market. IOW Americans pay way more for the same product. You can bet everyone and his brother is trying to figure out how to grab a big chunk of that price disparity (foreign AND american). Capitalism can be rather predictable at times.

    And guess what? Under NAFTA we are obligated to take action. Not that we wouldn't anyway because we understand what being in an economic, political, social and military partnership means. We can only wish trump achieves the same enlightenment.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2018
  23. reallybigjohnson

    reallybigjohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,849
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If Trump's goal is zero tarriffs across the board as he mentioned in the G7 meeting then I hope that he succeeds wildly. If you oppose Trump on this solely because its Trump then you are both ignorant of basic economics AND rooting against America.
     
    Swede Hansen likes this.
  24. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Or where they would be closest to their markets.. Look at Alcoa in Arabia... They have been very successful because Arabia has lots and lots of bauxite and and they have huge market exposure in the East.
     
  25. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113

Share This Page