Trump and Putin joke together about Russian interference in US elections.

Actually he had no authority to break official DOJ policy. On the first friggin page but by all means continue to refuse to accept facts even when they are staring you in the face.

If trump didn't have an army of useful idiots, his support would be in the single digits.

 

Its only slander if it isn't true. Even socrates knew that. As for losing a debate, sounds like you and the black knight have a lot of the same gumption.

 

Translation: You bought into Mueller's politics and not what legal experts say.

 

What legal experts? Judge Napolitano? Oh wait, he thinks trump is in deep doodoo, too.

But I see you've drunk the koolaid and believe the Mueller, a life long republican, appointed by a trump appointee and life long republican, operating within the trump administration's DOJ was nothing more than a political witchhunt.

Keep an iron grip on those straws trump keeps spreading with each shovel of bullshit he dumps on you.

 

LOL, somehow stating 'a life long republican' erases his bad behavior in the past and absolves him of his political shenanigans with the report.

 

And to provide a pretext for Hillary and Obama to highjack our Intelligence agencies to illegally spy on their US political opponents, US Citizens.

 

Completely and totally entrenched in an alternative reality, What a time to be alive in trumpland.

 

If you don't know why Russia poses a threat - then how do you know that it does pose a threat.

Regardless - Saudi Arabia and other foreign actors pose far more of a threat to our electoral system than "Russia" - to the point of comparing a raindrop to a hurricane yet - our elected officials seem to have a fondness for El Saud's ass.

Looks to me like you are making a mountain out of a mole hill.

 

Translation: Rinse and repeat bullshit because I got nothing of substance since I didn't read what mueller had to say in the first place.

 

Well, you can be excused since you know nothing of Mueller’s past.

 

More than you it seems, but then again you also claim you read his report.

 

You can tell that's a load of Bonespurs.

 

Err, which "legal experts"?

 

I guess she forgot who the legal experts were.

 

Just because you buy into the political nature of the report completely clueless of the inconsistencies or lack of evidence is not my problem.

 

Just about any not suffering from Trump hate.

 

So, there aren’t any “legal experts”. Why bullshit us?

 

Where is it inconsistent?

 

For one Mueller provides no evidence that Russia hacked the DNC computers.

 

LOL!

Yes, there's "no evidence of that!

https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/18/mueller-clinton-arizona-hack/

I suppose proof of the Sun being hot is necessary? We have to "prove" to you that the Moon isn't made of green cheese?

 

The FBI never investigated the DNC servers forensically (their job). DNC hired Crowdstrike who provided a redacted report to the FBI through DNC lawyers. In other words, they didn't even get all the alleged 'evidence'. Kinda like the fox guarding the hen house.

 

Well, I guess you're free to ignore the freaking dozens of posts on the issue and arrive at the patently absurd conclusion that there's "no evidence" of Russian hacking!

Unbelievable. *LOL*

 

Guess some are just so gullible that no direct evidence and paid for opinion from the DNC means evidence.

 

There isn't any political nature to it. You can't show a single instance of that. YOu also can't show a single "inconsistency".

But I can readily understand why you are so clueless of the report's contents since you'd have to read it in order to have an informed opinion in the first place. I do get that it saves a ton of time and intellectual effort to just be told what to think it says.

 

LOL, no evidence that Russia hacked into the DNC except by DNC paid Crowdstrike that redacted the report and the DNC lawyers handed the redacted report over to the FBI so the FBI never had the full report. The FBI never did any forensic examination of the servers. The FBI never had any direct evidence of the claim. The fox watching the hen house.