Verdict is in!! Once again, U.S. Courts allow cops to gun down UNARMED Black males posing no threat!

Not fantasy. I am a superhero. I used to protect Portland. Now I protect Salt Lake City. I even have an Instagram and everything.

 

Nope, crawling on hands and knees while begging for his life. Officer found not guilty. No riots, no outrage from MSM.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mesa-p...er-seen-crawling-begging-in-disturbing-video/

 

That's a nice conspiracy theory you got there. You completely ignore the fact that (1) more whites are killed by police than blacks and (2) armed black murderers have been arrested without much incident.

No it ain't. Not only did the officer saw the car that matched the description, but that car had bullet holes. I wouldn't be taking any chances.

Evidence?

Please watch this video.

 

From your own source:

In my opinion the shooting was justified.

Also, the verdict came from jury - both sides in the case get to pick and agree on the jury. If they were ok then, then why crying racism now?
This seems to me the case where a lawyer wants to make a name for himself and keeps dragging the family through courts.

 

No matter how much you fleece reality, by focusing on irrelevant elements, you still cannot change the fact that this suspect was posing no lethal-threat when the cop decided to shoot him.

The factual displacement of the other, suspect, does fortunately verify that the cop 1)faced no lethal-threat and 2)was intent on lynching Black males ---and racism's jury was intent on allowing him to do it.

 

They don't usually run...they are like "yes sir/maam"
Even with that in mind, you would think they can train cops to aim for the legs in this scenario

 

There are more whites than blacks. Do the arithmetic.

 

On what? If the cop is a psychopath?

 

No sir, they are not "yes sir/maam" as they often run.

It's just that, since they are White, then they don't get shot unless they actually did something violent toward the cop.

There's never any "perceived" threat, when shooting Whites, because 99.9999% of the time we can trust that White Privilege was fully effective. White suspect did some thing to get shot.

 

Is that why some cops shoot them or is it just target practice?

 

Dregs of society? New code word?

 

No. Those are God-fearing, Democrats that you described.

I described Blacks who are self-loathing, COONS, that assist powerful White-racism by helping annihilate their own Black citizenry. SCOTUS Justice Clarence "Uncle" Thomas wrote the modern day instruction manual for this treacherous, Black Lifestyle.

 

You are the one bending a reality. One thing is when a cop stops a car on a highway in the middle of the day for going 10mph over the speed limit. If the driver picks up and runs then shooting is not justified. We are looking at the case where a cop stops a cars that matches the description of a car that was involved in a drive by shooting and has bullet holes. I don’t know about you, but to me this is a dangerous situation and I’d consider all occupants of the car as armed and dangerous. Cops job is to stop the crime and to stay alive. When the occupants of the car started to run the cop doesn’t know if they are armed, but he knows there is a strong chance these criminals will commit more violent crimes.

Adults that were involved in this case concluded that the cops actions were justified.

Your attempts to cry racism, while ignoring circumstances just indicates that you are a racist yourself and that you cannot logically asses anything without racist conspiracies.

 

This isn't about racism. It's about whether or not it was a justified shooting. The Jury concluded that it was justified. And there were several blacks on the Jury. For the record, LEO's kill twice as many whites as blacks. And those most likely, per capita, to be killed or incarcerated by LEO's are Native Americans, not blacks. Those least likely, per capita, to be killed or incarcerated by LEO's are Asian Americans, not whites. The issue in these shootings isn't about race. But whether or not the use of deadly force was justified.

 

I've seen that video before. Can't watch it.

 

He wasn't running away when the cop began shooting.

 

This is a pro-Racism remark, indeed, since OJ had the unique privilege as a Black man to prevent racism's criminal justice system from blaming him for murders he didn't commit.

 

This is a pro-Racism remark, indeed, since OJ had the unique privilege as a Black man to prevent racism's criminal justice system from blaming him for murders he didn't commit. If you have proof OJ murdered people, then provide, or just shut up then embrace Racism's criminal justice system rarely not haunting a darkskin Blavk citizen.

 

He should have kept, still, instead of appearing to try to ease his way up to the cop so he can become a lethal threat. Just like we say about unarmed Black males; obey the cops, and you won't get shot!!

 

Oh please. GTFOH.

If you can watch these cops, execute a child, then you can watch anything:

 

The officer did not know he was unarmed — any person that is conscious would believe someone that just participated in a drive by shooting (with guns) is likely still armed. This “young kid” was a danger to society and I hope more brave officers take them out before these “young kids” harm my or your family.

Good riddance to the “young kid” and bravo to the brave cop.

What is it with all the mourning over this pieces of **** while not a peep happens after one of these “young kids” kill an actual innocent child? It’s disgusting.

 

Please show the specific evidence or trial transcript, verifying that the cop knew the exact human who was going to be armed.

No matter what you all say, ever, I refuse to buy "fit the description" as a reason for cops to put unarmed humans at risk, wherever they approach them in America.

If the cop saw no gun, he had no business shooting. Period.

FACT: The shorter the distance between a suspect, and a cop, then the greater the threat. That's police training that's police reality, in every scenario of police approaching citizens in probable cause situations. Always.

So the cop's lack of fear and regard for his safety toward the much-closer suspect, who did not run, is proof that the cop never felt there was a lethal-threat ---as according to his own actions--- which racism's Prosecutor stayed hush-hush about.

Actually I equate this cop's mea culpa ((via the suspect who did not run and the Prosecutor disguising it)) to the Zimmerman mea culpa. Regarding racism's Prosecutors in both of these cases.

In terms of Zimmerman Prosecutor refusing to easily send Zimmerman, I repeat, easily send Zimmerman to Prison by focusing on the police rep who advised Zimmerman to not go after Trayvon/let cops do their job.

What's disgusting is how so many of you hate Black people, so much, you're too blind to see that people like me salivated over the day these 2 thugs would've been sentenced to Prison. Or whoever else that an investigation might've revealed them exiting the vehicle before the cop spotted the vehicle But hey, that can't happen now. Because racism's cop decided to play the role of cop prosecutor judge jury & executioner.

And that, is what is most pathetic here. Yes that is what pro-Racism people are too blind to see.



...




What if, arresting him wouldve then revealed things we now will, never know, since cops left only one suspect of savage thuggery alive? The stupidity in supporting this cop's actions is, infinite, and it does a great job of highlighting illogical thought.

 

You are not serious, are you? You actually believe OJ was innocent? Seriously? Seriously?

 

Show proof OJ committed the murders, or else quit trolling in here! Stop disrespecting those honest White jurors in that case.

 

You must mean, like this vid here??

...when a kid kept trying to inch closer to a cop's gun? After cop told him to stop moving?? Was White Privilege, at play here? Thinking only Black thugs have to obey cops??