VIDEO: Pack Of Black Thugs Surround White 13-Year-Old… It Does Not End Well

Pants up, Don't loot

 

The ethnic Russians living in eastern Ukraine are being hunted and shelled by neo-Nazis in Kiev. It hasn't reached a genocidal level by any means, but it's not for a lack of desire or will on the part of the Ukrainian neo-Nazis.

Either way, how does the recentness of the genocide factor into it? Do modern "whites" get to take credit for all the good things "white" culture produced in the past but none of the awful, horrible things that it produced? Seems like you want to have it both ways.

 

So you take a correlation between two genes (among thousands of other genes) and violent crime and assume that the genes are causing violent crime?

I'm blown away by the expertness of your scientific analysis.

 

According to your own statistics, even if blacks were responsible for all violent crime in America (about 430,000 offenses) that would only constitute about 0.1% of the black population, and that's assuming no repeat offenders. In other words, well over 99% of blacks in America are largely peaceful.

 

Which war on your list do you attribute to the inherent violence of blacks? Give me one example.

 

I care.

I'd advise White-Americans to never go any where unarmed, and travel in groups.

Never trust Blacks you don't personally know, ever!

Never let them get close, and if you feel threatened, Kill. Better to go down taking a bunch of them out, than just be slaughtered.

Some Blacks, that you meet in controlled circumstances, will turn out to be very good people, but the odds are 4:1 against it, so never let down your guard.

If you're White, and don't know the Blacks, assume the worst, you won't often be wrong!

That's Reality in the Obama-Nation!

-

 

Can you refute the fact that well over 99% of black Americans are not violent criminals?

 

Actually, it is isolated, because only a tiny percentage of the black population is actually committing violent crimes.

 

It's only okay if you assume that humans actually fall into discrete races, and that all the members of that "race" share responsibility for the actions of a tiny percentage of its membership.

 

Correlation is not causation.

 

To ignore the racial aspects of attacks such as the one in the OP video, is naivete on a grand scale.

 

How is their skin color relevant when 99% of black Americans aren't violent criminals?

 

The gene causes abbherant violent behavior, hence the researchers statement: However, only .5% of whites have the 2-repeat allele version compared to 4.7% of blacks.

That means blacks are 9.4 times more likely to have the extremely dysfunctional version of the gene than whites. Considering that black Americans are 9 times more likely to commit murder, this is very significant.


Having a higher occurrence of the genetic formula for violent behavior, is far more than correlation, especially when one faxtors in the empirical data regarding violent crime and race, from the FBI's UCR.

Fee free to keep your head in the sand...or acknowledge the facts, and start thinking of solutions.

 

Correlation is not causation.

If these genes cause violence, then why isn't everyone who has the genetic combination a violent criminal?

 

Most geneticists don't subscribe to traditional conceptions of race in the first place.

 

Don't scare him, it's white people. By like 20 million lol.

 

What a bunch of made-up crap.

Meanwhile, blacks are 13% of the population, and whites 70% ................... but, according to the NY Times:

 

So, your claim is that while approximately 10% of black males are in jail, only a tiny fraction of that are violent criminals, and the rest are peaceful criminals ?

 

Reality, look into it.
Had he been armed. Most would scatter as soon as he cleared leather.
Then the remaining would taunt and dare him to shoot.
Then one may even pull a gun of their own, from behind another.
As soon as he shoots. He is done, the vid will be edited to show nothing but him shooting an "unarmed black man".
That's the reality.

 

I misread your original response... Yes, none except blacks in the profession of fighting. My bad man. Thugs are cowards and always resort to guns and gangs. I would assume that it's a fear of losing a one on one battle to a white guy. Even though they may not lose every time, they don't want to risk the chance.

 

As a percentage, that "tiny" percentage is minuscule among the other races. See the demographics of the prison population.

To be clear, do I think that all black people are violent criminals as a result of the small minority that are? Of course not.

Do I think that black culture has produced a higher percentage of violent criminals than the other races. Absolutely.

 

Wait, are you saying that only 376,858 blacks in America are violent?

 

They could be...perhaps a study should be done. Understanding that not all violence is reported. A black thug beats up his children...may or may not be reported...most often probably not. A black thug beats up his wife or g/f in many if not most cases goes unreported. A black thug attacks a white person...may not be reported, even if reported the thug may not be apprehended....so in a nutshell a lot more of violence out there than is reported.

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...dLLqKxLSNMl9YzoIQ&sig2=u374SeDxoxeZlZ8Hs9YgSw

 

We are talking specifically blacks in America. On average they commit a higher percentage of violent crime per capita. I've pointed you toward the crime stats several times and all you come back with is nonsense and deflection.

Unfairly judged? Please. LOOK AT THE VIDEO...look at the history of such events in recent years....explain to us all HOW pointing this out is unfairly judging anyone?

Do you have any news reports, videos, crime stats in the last 10 years showing gangs of whites beating lone blacks? DO you have any statistics showing this sort of crime rate per capita for blacks and whites?










So you are saying you have no source. Ok.[/QUOTE]