VIDEO: Pack Of Black Thugs Surround White 13-Year-Old… It Does Not End Well

Same concept applies.

You didn't say it, but that's the motivation. The noble savage has been a literary construct for hundreds of years and it has become part of the progressive egalitarian worldview.

That's not a fact, that's your opinion.

- - - Updated - - -

What I want to know is what does this have to do with blacks acting violently in non war affected areas in the US and elsewhere? You seem to be following Sadistic Savior's routine of obfuscating black criminality in Western areas with wars that occur elsewhere in the world.

- - - Updated - - -

How many approve of such violence, without doing it themselves? I seem to remember recent black riots that involved thousands where they advocated burning entire cities to the ground.

- - - Updated - - -

I can't answer that.

- - - Updated - - -

You haven't established that as a "fact". That's the first problem I see with your question.

- - - Updated - - -

Criminals are the minority in every group. Blacks just have a much bigger minority than others.

 

White People are becoming much more racially conscious. It was not that long ago that a thread like this would not even be allowed on this board.

White People for the most part have completely given up on the old liberal goal of a integrated society....it never worked...but was still promoted for years and years even though everyone knew it was not working.

What does all this portend for the black community?...well for certain it is not good news. The political climate is changing and add to that all the concern about illegal immigration and it is not hard to see that the country is attuned to turning back the clock on all these fallacious and failed liberal social programs that have done so much harm.

 

You race-baiting and "Poor Unarmed Black Man" B.S. is REJECTED!

The "Poor Unarmed Black Man" murdered Delbert Belton, Zemir Begic, Richard Fletcher, Carter Strange, and dozens upon dozens of others while supposedly "Unarmed"!





ENOUGH! You'll get no sympathy or forgiveness from ME or many, if not MOST other White-Americans!

If Blacks attack, Kill them ALL, reload, and seek more... at least you go down taking out a few of the scum, so the rest of your people don't have to live with them!

That's REALITY!

That's COURAGE!

Whites will Band-Together for Survival and the Black Thugs assaulting Whites will DIE!

That's where your "Race War" is going!

-

 

Race war? LOLOLOLOL
You go boy. Bet you would fold up like a suit case in the face of a bunch of young black thugs.

 

2010 FBI crime stats lists 163,670 violent crimes attributed to "blacks".

2010 Census lists 38,929,319 American "blacks".

That's 0.4% of "black" Americans.

But let's be generous to the opposition and triple the amount of violent crimes committed by blacks (due to under-reporting, etc.) and remove the entire 2010 US prison population of 1,612,395 from the black population (in order to account for blacks who have already committed violent crimes) and it still only comes out to one percent of the black population committing a violent crime. Seems to me, if "blacks", as a group, truly were predisposed towards violent crime, more than one percent of the population would be committing violent crimes year-to-year.

 

Ridiculously irrelevant non-stat, which does nothing to alter the fact that blacks commit a far higher rate of violent cries per capita, than any other race/ethnicity in America.

 

What concept?

No, it's not my motivation. Humans from any nominal racial class are capable of violence, including tribal Africans. I have never said or implied otherwise.

Which part of the statement is not factual?

I'm not obfuscating anything. All humans, "blacks" included, are capable of violence, and have engaged in violence, and will continue to engage in violence as long as humans think using violence to solve problems is an acceptable course of action. You are the one trying to draw some kind of important distinction between the violence of "whites" and "blacks", not me.

If you think that is relevant somehow to my point (don't see how it is), then you tell me how many of them approve of "such violence" (which violence are you referring to?).

Because?

Took the total amount of violent crimes from 2010 (from the source you provided), divided it by the total population of American blacks, and converted the decimal to a percentage.

Didn't think it was that hard to figure out.

It's kind of hard for "blacks" to "have" something when 99% of them are not actually committing violent crimes, unless you think they are all somehow responsible for the actions of a few individuals.

 

Sorry if facts bother you. Not my problem.

 

The noble savage. Doesn't really matter if they are black or Arab. White progressives will approach both with the same attitude.

It's possible you're not even aware of what you're doing. It's a very subversive force.

You're suggesting a causal link between US foreign policy and the most recent wars occurring in the Middle East and elsewhere. That's your opinion.

There is an important distinction between both groups, which can be seen in virtually every violent crime statistic out there, so why shouldn't I make the distinction?

Clearly this conversation upsets the white guilt apologists for blacks, who seem to think society should just deal with the fact that a small racial minority is committing as much violent crime as everyone else combined. People need to stay silent about it, just so the apologists can brag to their friends about how enlightened, tolerant, and "unlike those other white people" they are. It's pathetic. It's the zenith of subservience, and I highly doubt blacks actually respect those prostrating whites for it. They spend no amount of time going online and chastising each other for having bad opinions of whites. They are not pressured to.

If a large percentage of the community approves of the violence, even though they aren't committing the violence themselves, it still damages the cheery picture you're trying to convey that 99% of them are peace loving folks.

Because it's unknowable given the current data.

Fallacious logic. You can't conclude that 99% of blacks are not committing violent crimes based off the arrest data alone. Some are committing crimes and not getting caught, which would keep them off of these records.

They are doing very little to police their own and reform their own communities. Most seem more comfortable to blame whitey and the Government for their problems. It's a very common attitude. They do deserve some of the blame for it.

 

no, its 100% factual.

no American invasion of Iraq means no Syrian civil war and no ISIS or Al Qaeda in Iraq.

 

You have no way of knowing what would have happened in the Middle East had the US not invaded Iraq so you're simply speculating and calling your speculation "facts". Same as Ethereal.

 

IMO, we shouldn't. But then to quote MLK he wanted us to judge his fellow man not by the content of their skin, but by their actions and deeds. It was originally meant to be uplifting, but unfortunately his fellow men(and women sometimes) don't want to be uplifted. They want to be pitied. And as long as we hold the pity party for them, they're going to remain in the slums.

No matter how much money we throw at them. It's an attitude problem. The good thing is, attitude's aren't genetic or racial in anyway. The Black Community can fix its problems literally tommorrow if it wants to. It starts by fixing two addicting problems: We as a society have got to stop pitying them and they have to stop expecting pity.

It's a chain reaction, the moment we stop pitying them after a while they'll get it. Pity is never healing, pity weakens the soul. Pity tells you that you're little more and probably a lot less than you think you're worth.

 

They conveniently forget that Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who gassed the kurds and did numerous other untold things to keep his brutal grip on the country. There were rivalries and factions waiting for a chance to strike. Saddam would've faced an Arab Spring-like uprising at any rate, there was no future for Saddam in Iraq just like "Assad had to go". Unless you think the Arabs are less than human and preferred living under a dictatorship.

Us going in and stabilizing Iraq was the best possible move we could make, unfortunately we didn't stabilize the country and so we failed the mission. I won't deny that. I would've done it better than Bush and Neo-cons(anyone could, to be honest). They thought the stabilization would take care of itself and acted like it. That was the big mistake right there, it wasn't a tactical blunder it was a socio-political blunder.

The truth is, to guide the Middle East to a post-non violent society, will take reform and possibly occupation by the West. Literally, Islam itself will have to be totally reconfigured or outright banned. We have to accept that there are some thoughts that in general, do not do the human race any good.

 

If we wouldn't have entered world war II, the Germans would have been satisfied with continental Europe, and everybody would live happily ever after.

We would be much better off with a Nazi ally in Europe.

We were wrong for joining the war.

/sarcasm

Your post is about as logical as that.

 

Right!!, until it's one of your kids, wife or even yourself become the target.

 

We might have been better off. I don't think Hitler or the leaders who would have succeeded him would have allowed Europe to become majority Arab Muslim, with the rest being a bunch of left-wing socialists looking forward to the day that their race dies.

 

sorry, but its a fact that ISIS and the Syrian civil war is a direct result of the power and control vacuum that was created by the Iraq invasion

 

Islamic terrorism and Islamic terrorist groups have been around a very long time. They could have formed and taken over land in the Middle East with or without the US, and have in the past. We're witnessing the next wave of Islamic jihad. There's been major waves over it going back 1400 years.

I know how desperate some people are to blame the West or anything "white" for everything, including black violence (this thread), but reality often doesn't work that way.

 

yeah, but ISIS ws able to grow and thrive because of the power vacuum we created in Iraq.

 

But they were the JV according to your fearless leader. Go figure that one.

 

the "JV"?

 

Yep, Obama said that. How soon you forget what your God pronounces. Shame on you.

 

I don't believe in your God. I'm a Deist.

 

Beautiful Ron. I bet you're a deacon of the First Deist Church of Manhattan. Still, Obama said that ISIS was the JV. Nothing like incompetence in government. BTW what wisdom makes you think you know my religious beliefs. I'm one those very special people who survived the trip to other side. Nothing like waking up in San Antonio a week later and having that WTF moment.

 

what is a "JV"?

sorry, I guess I'm just not down with all the recent & hip acronyms.