What the policing response to the KKK in the 1960s can teach about dismantling white supremacists...

Complete with pre-positioned weapon dumps.

 

Police brutality is never acceptable.

 

Neither is looting pillaging and openly rebellion against the government be it MAGA or BLM/ANTIFA

 

They have an Air Force now. Mostly drones. There are locations, hidden locations, where dozens of AntiFa specialists pilot, by remote control, drones who surveil the surrounding area, searching out conservatives, tracking their movements, cataloging their contacts. Watching waiting.

 

And let's not forget the attack on the Capital was NOT about race. Race had nothing to do with it. So beyond that where is all this white supremist insurrection and anarchy and violence compared to the BLM and Antifa insurrection and anarchy and violence. Let's use these KKK tactics on them too if it will stop where the majority of that violence has been coming from. In another thread about Brown's father wanting $22M from BLM because.....well they got it all because of his son.......it says BLM is sitting on $90M dollars. Well who is in charge then, who are the officers of the organization, who controls the money and the organization. How about charging them with aiding and abetting? How about all those storeowners and cities filing a lawsuit against them for some of the money so they can rebuild.

 

I'm sure if it was white conservatives burning down cities, attacking federal buildings and courthouses and local law enforcement buildings trying to kill the people inside y'all would sing a different tune.

 

But y’all have been.

 

More figments of your imagination. Sadly the modern left now supposes that everything disagrees with their peculiar
religious cant must be some form of conspiracy theory.

 

I didn't say it was acceptable, but since people seem to think other acts of violence and general mayhem are acceptable as a reaction, they must have some idea of how much is an offset.

 

Whatever that meant

 

I like the idea of suing BLM for damage caused by their riots. It hits the problem right in the head. The trick is to prove that it was their riots.

 

This guy has also obviously completely bought into the white supremacist BS, and can't think otherwise. "White supremacy" is every bit as racist as "black inferiority", and if he were a genuine scientist in his thinking he would know that.

 

How about brutality inflicted on police?

What's your stance on that?

 

Done in their name with their leadership and members in tow. I think we has as much as against the couple of white supremist out there.

 

You have been.

 

Actually most terrorists are relatively well educated. It's a common misconception but weirdly enough engineers are over-represented. Weird.

Source? Even then why does that matter? The number of cop fatalities has been going down for years now.

Can't conceive of being at fault if they can't think they did something wrong in the first place.

Yeah that's not a good way to look at that at all. Also, what does that have to do with what I'm saying? I'm saying there are more cases of right wing terrorism than left wing terrorism. Citing one case isn't going to prove me wrong. Plus you can't prove that's terrorism.

Well we know the Proud Boys were there. And we know that

 

You asked for my opinion, you go it. What I said I can prove. I am not interested in dealing with your misinformation.

 

Is it not difficult to make the that an organization that counts a Latino and an African American among it's leadership is a white supremacists group is it not?

 

Oh PF wouldn't let me edit for some reason. This is what I was saying:
"
Proud Boys are a dangerous 'white supremacist' group say US agencies"

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...te-supremacist-group-law-enforcement-agencies
"
FBI Categorizes Proud Boys As Extremist Group With Ties To White Nationalism"
https://www.npr.org/2018/11/20/6697...xtremist-group-with-ties-to-white-nationalism

Believe it or not, the Proud Boys are White Supremacists.

 

Dude given that as a general rule of thing they just pick up on whatever BS adl and splc kick out. Scarcely reliable.

 

In the field of political extremism they’re both considered good sources to use. Plus FBI is also saying this. You don’t have to like the sources but they’re good sources to use.

 

Again FBI uses ADL and SPLC for their info. The latter two to assume everyone not a card caring socialist or a Democrat has White supremacist ties. Note both organizations make their money off of scaring people to death about white supremacists Nazis and what have you. The FBI uses their info because it helps protect their funding from cuts by Democrats.

 

Only if you are good at make believe.

 

It is also rare.

 

Oh okay I see what you’re saying now.

Yeah that’s just a dumb answer riddled with conspiracy theories. Are you really saying the Democrats control the FBI? If this was true then why now are we hearing and dealing with this vs the 2000s when right wing terrorism was an issue back then too?

I mean I use interpretive analysis methodology so yes.