White, male, heterosexual, Christian privilege is everywhere, college students told <<MOD WARNING>>

I wrote that Republicans in Indiana, Utah, and Washington did indeed join the KKK: go read the histories.

Democrats do indeed reflect the values of civil liberty for all, including whites.

 

And then they'll try putting the onus on you to prove that bigfoot doesn't exist. When you can't, they think they've won something

 

Guys, quit tracking Bigfoot, you won't find it. Promise.

White privilege exists, whether you like it or not. Tis what is.

 

Let's just track David Dukes recent endorsements. Ilhan Omars white privilege is what earned her Dukes praise? Rachel Dolezal's white privilege earn her the top spot at the NAACP? You attach way too much significance to skin pigmentaion. It's been my privilege to point that out for you.

 

I grew up in S. California.

 

Not in the slightest. I am telling you to not worry about it, you are doing fine and not discriminated against.

 

It was obvious in S. California in San Diego's north county when I was boy and then working in restaurants there as a teen.

 

There are studies on it.

http://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/savvy/journals/Rose/Rose_BlackandWhite.pdf

 

Maybe you can answer the question no one else will: What can't a person of color accomplish due to racism?

 

I rarely worry about liberal grievances, and yes I am fine, thank you. And no, I'm not being discriminated against, I'm being stereotyped.

 

That study reinforces what we already know: the school systems that have an overwhelming density of a certain type of student (based on race, religion, sex, etc.) will have an overwhelming sense of confidence.

That study does not suggest that confidence is transferred and sustained in a heterogenous population.

Interesting study.

 

As to the Democratic Party as the founder of the KKK. https://www.politifact.com/facebook...-democratic-party-didnt-create-klu-klux-klan/

No, the Democratic Party didn’t create the Ku Klux Klan

By Ciara O'Rourke on Wednesday, October 24th, 2018 at 11:20 a.m.

President Donald Trump has faced criticism for normalizing white nationalists but some conservative bloggers are trying to flip the script, shooing the Ku Klux Klan out of the "Big Tent" and into liberal territory.

"I hate when people aren’t smart enough to realize that the KKK was formed by the Democratic Party," reads a Facebook post from Oct. 11, 2017. This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.) Though the post is a year old, it continues to circulate online, generating nearly 27,000 shares and 840 comments, many as recently as a day ago.

"Just so you know," the post goes on, "the Ku Klux Klan’s original purpose was to oppose the Republican Party’s policies intended to establish economic and political equality for blacks (sic) folks after the Civil War."

continued

 

That’s BS.

 

Continued from #362

Facebook isn’t the only place this idea has spread.

Back in 2013, Virginia State Sen. Stephen Martin also claimed that the KKK was created by Democrats. The Republican lawmaker soon retracted the statement after after PolitiFact Virginia started to investigate the origins of the KKK.

Reporter Sean Gorman discovered then that the group’s founding is murky but that "historians generally agree it was founded by a handful of Confederate veterans in Pulaski, Tenn. as a social fraternity and it quickly changed into a violent group that terrorized newly empowered black and white Republicans in the South."

One historian confirmed there’s a historic link between the Democrats and the KKK: Many angry Southern whites during the 1860s and 1870s were Democrats, and some joined the KKK. But according to J. Michael Martinez, who wrote the 2007 book "Carpetbaggers, Cavalry and the KKK," it’s misleading to say the Democratic Party founded the Klan.

It was a more of a grassroots creation, Martinez said. Plus, the Democratic Party of the past is not the Democratic Party of today. From the 1930s onward, "you think of the Democratic Party being considered the party of the disenfranchised," he said.

Carole Emberton, an associated professor at the University of Buffalo, agreed.

"Although the names stayed the same, the platforms of the two parties reversed each other in the mid-20th century, due in large part to the white ‘Dixiecrats’ flight out of the Democratic Party and into the Republican Party after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964," she said.

Back in the mid-19th century, various Klans in the South acted as a "strong arm" for many local Democratic politicians, Emberton said. The Confederate general believed to be the KKK’s first Grand Dragon even spoke at the 1868 Democratic National Convention. By the time the Civil Rights Act became law, the Democratic Party supported so-called liberal causes that "had been the banner of the Republican Party."

While some Democrats supported the KKK, there’s no evidence the group was founded by their political party. And context matters—the anti-black Democratic Party of yore is not the party that Hillary Clinton belongs to today.

 

Ridiculous.

 

Our history proves that white privilege is a fact.

 

JakeStarkey said: ↑
That study reinforces what we already know: the school systems that have an overwhelming density of a certain type of student (based on race, religion, sex, etc.) will have an overwhelming sense of confidence.

That study does not suggest that confidence is transferred and sustained in a heterogenous population.

Interesting study.

So that is your opinion, OK.

 

Who cares ??? The KKK is a radical fringe group consisting of a few thousand individuals in a nation of 330,000,000.

 

This is the kind of crap that comes from academia which is used to justify identity politics.

 

Thank you, AFM.

The KKK is irrelevant today.

Their existence means nothing. Tell the pounders from left and right to let it go.

 

The fact that it is true bothers you?

 

my bad, that was a typo. 6 million so-called africans were tied in chains and forced to work on plantations in the americas. the only work whites did was carry a whip and shoot people who tried to run away. the lie that is taught in college that america was built by whites is shameful but as we know, americans are shameless. a truly wicked seed like alexander the great whom the west adores but he slaughtered more ppl than hitler, babies and women included.

the whites changed the so called africans names and stole their culture. the WJE (white jewish europeans) were chief financiers of this so called trade, columbus journey was financed by Dutch Jewish Europeans (DJE) and forced so- called africans to worship a White Jewish Idol instead of Yeshua The Mighty African King. Here is a depiction of an Israelite slave drawn by the slavers;

 

Can you feel it coming?

 

this is an Israeli explaining why slavery happened

 

We cannot let your racist history go, no matter how badly you want it to become irrelevant, you don't get the control as you wish.

No whitewash for you.