White nationalism is NOT white supremacism.

The left wants to divide us by race so misuse commonly understood definitions.

 

It seems you either forgot or are ignoring the comment of yours that I was replying to: "There is no evidence immigrants today assimilate any more slowly than immigrants in the past. None."

Assimilation. The study I linked addressed that very issue. Your reply avoided it.

 

Why should America be "very white"??

 

Uh....the founding fathers of this country were immigrants. You don't know our history very well.

 

School busing for school integration is hardly natural.

 

You would be welcomed in Germany. Perhaps you should move?

 

The policies that lead to the segregation before that busing were unnatural. But keep pretending racial mixing is an abomination if you want. Just reveals racism for what it is.

 

The presence of the white idiots that shot up the place and their like minded ilk? I agree with that.

 

No, your link does not prove today's immigrants assimilate more slowly than previous waves of immigrants . . . Including, likely, your own ancestors

 

Why then did the US first become the most powerful nation while still 90% white?

 

Ah....so they are practicing what Hitler preached. Y'all aren't fast learners.

 

We are still the most powerful nation and we ain't 90% white.

 

This is why right-wing terrorism is unique. At the first suggestion of such terrorism, RW apologists flood the forums to 1) deny the existence of such terrorism and 2) play apologetics for the motives, especially defending white nationalism. This is crazy, but it happens every time.

 

I thought they (at least most of them) were born here.
Even if they weren't, that would make them immigrants from England to an English colony (which was still considered part of England).

 

Sure you do. Which is why you are participating in this thread.

 

So? Golem's claim was that ethnic diversity caused us to be so powerful in the first place; I showed that was not the case. All you did was say that our strength has existed both with and without diversity, again proving Golem wrong.

 

Are you denying they were of immigrant roots. It is a dumb premise to say there is too many immigrants in any one place especially one day they will be citizens.

 

Well that was the conclusion of the study, whether you believe it or not is another issue. However to be fair, the study was only of Mexican immigrants, not those from other countries, so it's not a complete picture. However Mexicans are the largest group of immigrants in recent years, so if they are not assimilating well, it speaks poorly of the entire idea of assimilation.

 

So? We continue to be strong despite not being 90% white so what?

 

That building in #75 is a replica.

 

Push citizens out? Like Hitler did?? Do tell.

 

So... Golem was wrong when he claimed that ethnic diversity is necessary for our strength. At best, all you've said is that it isn't detrimental to it.

 

I see. So you are with Sobo and want to get rid of citizens who you don't like?

 

We are stronger than when we were 90% white, much stronger.

 

Proud of genocide?