Whites OBJECTIVELY Have Less Rights than Minorities

Disagree. Diversity for the sake of diversity, especially when you promote a less qualified candidate, breeds contempt because the person who rightfully should have gotten the job or place in school becomes jealous and vengeful against the person who benefitted. Over time, given experiencing that occurrence over and over again, it begins to breed contempt not just against the individual but against the group.

And that’s whats happening today. The more you screw white people over to benefit blacks, the more contempt and hatred you breed.

 

Affirmative action was by created by Congress, a bunch of aristocrats, and signed by John F. Kennedy, a poster child of financial American privilege. An alumnus of Harvard University, Kennedy was a lieutenant in the US Navy, a US Representative, a US Senator, and the 35th President of the United States. He's the epitome of privilege that has been given everything and had little to no obstacles in his trajectory. No doubt he is a blue-blooded aristocrat. If you don't think John F. Kennedy does not meet the standard of blue-blooded aristocrat, well, then, we'll just have to agree to disagree. I'd really like to know what you think a blue-blooded aristocrat is.

I would be upset if I was a parent of a child who did their best to achieve such esoteric academic excellence to get into their dream school only to be denied because of their skin color. Imagine if Yale was that child's dream school. Ever since their child was little, they wanted to go to Yale, and they worked hard--harder than that black kid--and it was all for not. And then they found out that, despite all their hard work, they did not get in because of their skin color, something they can't help. Now if that woman voted Democrat, well, then perhaps her child can blame her for partially being responsible for such racism.

As to diversity being helpful, sure. Diversity of ideas is good. But diversity of melanin? There is no inherent value in diversity of melanin. In fact, such overvaluing of skin color is itself racist.

 

Black students do indeed do poorly

"Nationwide, the black student graduation rate remains at a dismally low 42 percent. But the rate has improved by three percentage points over the past two years. More encouraging is the fact that over the past seven years the black student graduation rate has improved at almost all of the nation's highest-ranked universities."

http://www.jbhe.com/features/50_blackstudent_gradrates.html

The white graduation rate is 60%

 

Gentrifier!

 

That kid deserved it cause she’s white. Screw her and her dreams. She can still get into another school. Her great great granddaddy benefitted from racism. She deserves to be discriminated against because she’s white.

/endsarcasm

 

Statistically, she was more likely discriminated against because the daddy of some other kid contributed more to the university, or was a legacy student (more often than not, white). Studies have shown that for every white student denied entry to Med school even though some minority kid had lower grades, that there were also 4.5 white student admitted with lower grades. So it could easily be that the deciding factor is preference to another white kid - not a minority.

 

Riiiight but they based that on legacy Or contribution to the university. And while that’s distasteful it’s not unconstitutional like discriminating based upon race.

We don’t have a right to go to college. We do have a right to not be discriminated against through LAW because of our race.

 

Wow, Asians are white people? This is news to me. Please cite your "multitudes of scholarship . . . which lay out how Asians are White [sic] people." I can go for a laugh.

You allude to Asians eyes, which are more slanted, as the only distinguishing feature. OK. Can you point to any naturally blonde or red-headed Asians, since their eyes, in your opinion, are the only thing that gives them away.

What?

Can someone translate that from gibberish to English?

I couldn't read beyond this point of your post. I felt my brain cells slowly dying off.

 

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." --Mark Twain



I'm not sure what statistics you are citing, but does the data of those statistics change when you narrow down from all whites to working-class and middle-class whites? I'm sure it does. Parents who donate money to a university as a form of nontechnical bribery to get their kids into the school to which they applying are typically rich; they are not working-class and middle-class whites. Legacy students, too, are less likely to be from working-class and middle-class families; typically, they are from rich families.

 

They don’t NOT hire white males. They just purposely put minorities and women, except Asians, ahead of them. Again, AA. Learn about it please before attempting to discuss issues. And since there is a finite number of spots available each year, white males are effected the most when those spots are now being given to less worthy demographics in order to pad their diversity numbers. It’s particularly egregious in Engineering. Some students have been exploiting it using engineering to get accepted then switching out after the first year. The more elite programs luckily have caught on and prevented students from changing majors once they’re accepted into Engineering. That’s a good thing, but would never have been an issue if they weren’t trying to pad their diversity numbers.

 

Nobody hires white males. That's why they have the highest unemployment of any demographic.


Oh wait. Never mind.

 

The university I got my degree from banned white males from campus.

Banning a race from a public institution should be unconstitutional because it violates the 14th amendments equal protection clause as well as the 1964 Civil Rights Act which banned discrimination in all organizations that received money from the government.

A white male professor showed up anyway and he received death threats and had to be escorted off campus by the police for his safety.

Students formed liberal terror groups, carrying bats and batons and chanted, "BLACK POWER, BLACK POWER, BLACK POWER," as a warning to any other white male who might come to campus to get an education or do their job.

How about a turn about test???

Imagine if it were white males who banned African Americans from campus, made death threats towards an African American professor, formed terror groups, carried baseball bats and batons, and chanted, "WHITE POWER, WHITE POWER, WHITE POWER..."

 

To protect the collateral for the money the bank is lending, to protect the interest of the owners, the shareholders, of the bank. Obviously the banks analyst almost made very wise predictions based on the location and the people to whom they were lending the money. You don't think your race had anything to do with it do you?

 

But you keep saying that they can’t “get in on their own merits” what you are saying is that they are not qualified. Were all the women who were denied access to jobs in colleges not qualified? I don’t hear you say that the men weren’t qualified because there were a lot of people that were more qualified but couldn’t reply. I remember hearing that Barack Obama got into Harvard because he was black assuming h wasn’t smart enough. I wonder if you get is upset over all the people who get in on legacies because daddy went there,

 

What university ? I really don’t believe that....
Black people have been banned from schools, from jobs etc...it was called normal

 

Obviously these are mentally challenged kids ...nice to make fun of them
]

 

Why when there are mass shootings in the United States can we assume they are white Christian males? More than 90% of the times

 

Clearly, reading comprehension is not one of your strengths.

As according to the fatuity you posted here; Your brain cells were dying off long, long before you read my post. Clearly.

 

This post is simply not based in, logic, because you continually discount the entire history and the present day USA, all because you don't want White people discriminated against today.

Yes, you have to ignore the daily cheating which White people perfect, decade after decade, where our good ol' boy networks look out for less-qualified White candidates. Clearly your posts show no Consciousness for how we White people bred contempt, because the Black person who rightfully should have gotten the job or place in school, became jealous and vengeful against the White-person who unfairly benefitted in our White-controlled society.

I find it, laughable, when people who silently watched Whites discriminate and cheat, decade after decade, now cry foul when it is time for Whites to give back some of what we have cheated for.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonexaminer.com/red-alert-politics/evergreen-state-college-students-host-no-whites-allowed-event-for-second-year-in-a-row-but-at-what-cost?_amp=true

Oh look they’re going to do it again. But I guess that’s cool right?

 

You’re talking about the past. I’m talking about the present. We ended that inequality under the law. Now you want inequality under the law for whites presently.

That is unacceptable.

 

We do not have a right to not be discriminated against on a personal level. That can never be legislated away.

We DO have the right to equality under the law. Which you apparently don’t understand.

 

and I’d be all for more severe penalties for whites who shoot up schools.

Are you in support of more severe penalties for blacks who engage in violent crime?

 

Was Trump the most qualified? But no complaints right?

 

Did the homeless looking guy on the left make good decisions in life? Did he drop out of school? Was he in jail or prison and just got out? And I don't know what to make of the kid on the right? Looks like post surgery or something. But I see you took the cowards way out and didn't answer my question, but instead attempted to be clever and failed. So why don't you man up? How does simply being white help what the left would call stereotypical red necks? Either answer the question or run away with your tail between your legs as you usually do whenever you're confronted with making a coherent argument.