Why are there so many priests that are pedos?

It''s your distasteful tactic of trying to divert the attention of this forum from the evil practice of child abuse by concentrating on a minor spelling error, that is the real problem.

You can't hide this hideous practice under an evil blanket, regardless of the words you use.

 

There was no spelling mistake, it was a matter of your comprehension and it appears to be you who is concentrating on the spelling thing because 4 of your last posts have mentioned it. As I pointed out you are unable to tell the difference between a child and an adult so you should be the last one commenting on pedophilia. If you cant understand what the term means how can you possibly be debating it?

 

You are the one who is unable, or more likely unwilling, to tell the difference between a child and an adult.

I hope you never come anywhere near any child of mine!

 

Most victims of child sexual abuse are abused by someone related to or close to them. That would make yourself much more statistically likely to abuse your own child which would be unsurprising.

 

No doubt this bit of news would be music to your ears (from Channel 4, 2010). Others, more respectful of children, will not be so thrilled :

"A Channel 4 News investigation reveals that more than half of the Catholic priests convicted for child abuse and sentenced to more than a year in prison, in England and Wales since 2001, remain in the priesthood - with some still receiving financial support from the Church and living in church houses.


The findings will test the reputation of the Catholic church here, on the eve of Pope Benedict XVI's first visit to the UK.

The disclosures raise questions about whether the Catholic church have followed recommendations made nine years ago to rid the church of child-abusing priests, our investigation has found.Yet at least 14 of the 22 priests convicted since then remain members of the clergy today.


Channel 4 News has also discovered that Lord Nolan's rules appear to have been quietly watered down. The recommendation was that for those convicted of the most serious sexual abuse "laicisation" would be the norm - it now appears that "laicisation" only needs to be considered in these cases.


Channel 4 News discovered that at least nine of the 22 convicted priests are still listed in the 2010 Catholic directory as members of the clergy. Only eight of them have been dismissed from the church."

 

Why would it be music to my ears? I haven defended pedophilia, you are lying again. Do you ever tell the truth? You are quite an untrustworthy person arent you? Do your children trust you? If I was them I wouldnt.

 

You would rather his Children trust the Gay (Closit NAMBLA member) Scoutmaster or Little League Coach over the Dad or get Spirituial Guidance from The Pagan Wiccan Lesbian former Unitarian Universalist over the Dads Church ...

 

You are just speculating. You have no data to back up your claim that Catholic priests are more likely to abuse children than others. I know you don't because there is none. All you have as hard evidence of that is your own preexisting bias.

Again, you're changing the subject. Do you want to talk about whether Catholic priests are more likely to abuse children? Do you want to talk about the policies of bishops in the 70s in regards to child abuse? Do you want to talk about the extent and nature of Church's claim of moral authority? What?

 

What is the difference, just out of curiosity? Is the difference whether they are on the near or far side of the stroke of midnight on their 18th birthdays? Their 16th birthdays? Their 14th birthdays? Their 21st birthdays?

 

Stop trying to push your line that paedophilia is normal. It is disgusting!

 

Another paedophilia pusher. You are absolutely disgusting. Don't ever go near any of my children or you will get more than you bargain for.

 

Another lie, do you lie to your children too? Interesting to note that those who protest the most are sometimes guilty of the acts they condemn so loudly themselves, something to with with self loathing and projection. You seem to be protesting the loudest here, plus you are attempting to attribute actions and posts to other people which are falsehoods. No one here is supporting pedophilia yet you cry so loudly that they are, then you seem so free to talk about your own children and pedophilia, not the actions of a normal person.

 

Nobody is doing that.

Nobody is denying that.

 

You pound your fist on your pulpit, braying dogmata, but you can't define the very words coming out of your mouth? Do you even know what children are or is the very term "child" merely an abstract symbol to you?

 

There is someone disgusting in this thread alright, however, it's none of the people you are attacking.

That particular forum member was merely asking a question, not pushing a particular view. You really can't see the difference? Seriously?

And to top it off, you finish your post with an implied threat of violence.

Settle down a little bit and learn to look at things more objectively, just as other forum members are doing in this thread. Nobody here is advocating paedophilia and your constant accusations to the contrary are totally unwarranted.

Chill dude

 

Dont try that line with me mate. We all know your, and your mates, real intentions on this site. Putting up a smokescreen will not hide it.

 

My God! This site is replete with them.How many more can there be!

 

Of course we know my real intentions, they havent wavered since I joined this site. I have always been upfront that my agenda is to keep allowing idiots to make themselves look stupid by asking inconvenient questions asking for actual factual information. This is another thread where I have been successful in my personal crusade.

 

Yes, thinkers. They are everywhere, I can understand your horror.

 

When a NAMBLA spokesperson is a guest on "Good Morning America" you guys will perhaps get it that the Left is trying to normalize Pedophelia .

 

They haven't done a very good job, seeing as how pedophilia is more vehemently condemned now than it was in the past.

 

Now, on the heels of the Catholic abuse scandal comes another of historic proportions—one that has the potential to be much greater and far-reaching. According to a draft report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education, in compliance with the 2002 "No Child Left Behind" act signed into law by President Bush, between 6 percent and 10 percent of public school children across the country have been sexually abused or harassed by school employees and teachers.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/4/5/01552.shtml

http://www.nysl.nysed.gov/edocs/investigation/secrets.htm

 

And ... those demographics are (Made up of Democrat Union members & Liberal Elitists for the most part ?)

 

NAMBLA isnt a political left wing organisation, someones yanking your chain there mate.

 

They are politically the Same as GLAAD & GLBT & anti prop H8te groups ,(Go Figure)