Zimmerman Trial (Thurs. July 11th) MOD ALERT

Already did.

 

You've proven nothing except you discount GZ's lies. I understand.

 

Fights aren't static , they move and positions adjust . Have you ever even seen a fight ??

 

If it was really self-defense ... why did Zimmy lie ?

 

Don't spin and lie. The prosecutor's point is that TM does not have three arms and could not see GZ's gun as it was stuffed in the back of his pants. So how do you go for a gun you cannot see?

 

What lies has GZ told?

 

You weren't there nor was I. GZ is now a proven liar. Have you ever had anyone try to kill you? No? Then what's your point?

 

So I'm watching whoever this prosecution clown is in closing arguments. He keeps becoming very animated and emotional. When I see that, I think I am dealing with someone short on facts, and thus is using emotions to sell me.

I wonder if I am different from the jurors.

 

Are you watching the closing arguments?

 

Because Martin could not have MOVED HIS HANDS, right?


I thought he had shoulders and elbows , for some reason.
Get inane, why dontcha?

Just like Bernice's IDIOCY; he thinks that people in a fight are STATIONARY in their positions= ASININELY STUPID.

The entire action is LIQUID, not STATIC.

"THINK".

 

So if no one was their , how is it a proven ???? Do you think about what you say or does it just roll out ?

 

Good Bernie's almost done, now we'll see a real closing argument.

 

Of course, prove GZ lied.

 

Thank god ! He's almost done. Make a pot of coffee for the jury. Maybe let them walk around the building.

And the JUDGE realizes Bernie put them to sleep !!! O'Mara get 'em wide awake tomorrow AM !!!

 

You approve of GZ's lies and prefer to deflect. Typical.

 

Zimmy shaking his head in utter dismay.

 

Sure am. Please point out a SINGLE LIE that you delude Bernice has proven.Let's see it.

 

Asked and answered. Your myopia is noted.

 

From what I have heard the jurors are bored and some will not even look at BDLR.

 

About what? He is not telling you anything. He's telling the jury how amazed he is about what happened. That doesnt prove it didn't happen that way. The burden is in him to provide the beyond a reasonable doubt scenario of what actually happened. To tie all the evidence into that scenario that proves it was not self defense. What was it?

 

You cannot point out a SINGLE ONE of the "lies" you keep LYING ABOUT, just like your claim that Zimmerman used a racial epithet on the phone= ANOTHER LIE.

Let's see the LIES Zimmerman told....

 

The fact that GZ claimed to be defending himself yet admitted he walked towards TM. Can't be in defensive mode and the aggressor at the same time.

 

Insults and answering questions with a question....nice dodging.

 

Typical Trayvonite. Cannot come up with a SINGLE EXAMPLE.

Absolute DODGE duly noted.

 

West ~ Zimmys name is misspelled so you must acquit ... LOL.